SNT vs ADT vs ICTSF Stock Comparison

Senstar Technologies, Adt and Icts International N V Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ECL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ADT ADT Inc.
$6.88 +7.3% 1M -21.3% 1Y
Market cap
$4.67B
P/E
8.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.16B
Div. yield
3.42%
Security Services Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Adt leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Adt 8, Icts International N V 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNTADTICTSFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $36.40M $4.67B $207.76M ADT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 74.0x 8.5x -14.0x ADT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -3.2% +2.1% — ADT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.3% 11.9% — ADT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.7% 8.2% — ADT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.7x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 3.42% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -67.9% -21.3% +27.6% ICTSF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -16.9%/yr -4.0%/yr -6.6%/yr ADT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.0% 29.8% 79.2% ADT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 69/100 — ADT

Percentile Scorecard

SNTADTICTSF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNTADTICTSF
Valuation 72 #32 of 112 96 #5 of 112 36 #72 of 112
Growth 3 #93 of 96 50 #49 of 96 –
Profitability 36 #59 of 91 91 #9 of 91 –
Financial Health 89 #15 of 125 14 #108 of 125 52 #61 of 125
Shareholder Returns – 92 #6 of 67 –
Overall 50 69 –
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ADT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • ICTSF ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNTADTICTSFSPY
1 month -3.1%+7.3%-5.8% -0.2%
3 months -10.9%-6.1%+0.9% +3.9%
6 months -44.5%-4.3%+27.6% +8.2%
Year to date -67.7%-14.7%+66.2% +12.9%
1 year -67.9%-21.3%+27.6% +12.3%
3 years +36.8%+20.9%+38.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +11.0%+6.5%+11.4% +23.3%
5 years -60.3%-18.3%-28.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -16.9%-4.0%-6.6% +10.9%
10 years -65.2%—+681.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year -10.0%—+22.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSNTADTICTSFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.0%29.8%79.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 60.6%35.4%124.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.890.700.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.15-0.710.35 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.7%-49.2%-68.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -68.2%-22.2%-13.6% -1.2%
52-week high $4.91$8.84$6.42 $779.14
52-week low $1.34$6.08$3.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNTADTICTSF
P/E now vs peer median 74.0xmedian 21.2x 8.5xmedian 21.2x -14.0xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x 0.4xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.9x 4.3xmedian 11.9x —median 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 13.7x 2.4xmedian 13.7x -6.3xmedian 13.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.4x 1.3xmedian 2.4x -9.8xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.00 0.05median 1.00 —median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNTADTICTSF
Revenue $36.80M $5.16B –
Gross profit $23.34M $4.17B –
Operating income $729.00K $1.29B –
Net income $378.00K $612.75M –
Free cash flow – $1.97B –
R&D $3.98M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.02 $0.75 –
Cash & equivalents $7.88M $3.88M $16.89M
Total debt $1.14M $7.69B $25.53M
Shares (diluted) 23.46M 820.13M 36.18M
Enterprise value -$26.32M $4.40B $95.20M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNTADTICTSF
P/E 74.0x 8.5x -14.0x
P/FCF – 2.4x -6.3x
P/Operating cash flow – 2.2x –
P/S 1.0x 0.9x 0.4x
P/B 0.9x 1.3x -9.8x
P/Tangible book 0.9x -3.5x -9.8x
EV/EBITDA – 4.3x –
EV/EBIT 39.5x 9.6x –
EV/Revenue 0.8x 2.4x –
EV/FCF – 6.3x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 5.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.05 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNTADTICTSF
Revenue growth (1Y) -3.2% 2.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 1.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -7.5% 1.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -1.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -86.3% -0.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 19.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) -92.6% -1.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 164.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) -90.5% 0.8% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 178.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 8.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 7.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 5.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNTADTICTSF
Gross margin 63.4% 80.7% –
EBITDA margin – 55.6% –
Operating margin 2.0% 25.0% –
Pretax margin 2.4% 16.6% –
Net margin 1.3% 11.9% –
FCF margin – 38.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 41.8% –
Return on equity 0.9% 16.8% –
Return on assets 0.7% 3.9% –
Return on invested capital 0.7% 8.2% –
Return on capital employed 1.6% 8.8% –
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 3.5x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNTADTICTSF
Debt / assets 0.8% 48.8% 4.7%
Debt / equity 0.0x 2.2x -0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.7x –
Debt / FCF – 3.9x –
Liabilities / assets 20.6% 77.9% 112.8%
Equity / assets 79.4% 22.1% -12.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 3.6x 0.7x 1.8x
Quick ratio 2.2x 0.4x 1.6x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.0x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 3.12 0.56 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNTADTICTSF
Dividend yield – 3.4% –
Net buyback yield – 15.2% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 18.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNTADTICTSF
Forward P/E – 8.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $0.86FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -3.4%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +19.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.95BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – -3.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +12.7% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSNTADTICTSF
Held by institutions – 94.5% –
Institutions holding – 456 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.7% –
Institutions buying – 297 –
Institutions selling – 125 –
Buyers to sellers – 2.38 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNTADTICTSF
SNT 1.00 0.02 -0.03
ADT 0.02 1.00 -0.18
ICTSF -0.03 -0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SNT, ADT and ICTSF?

Adt (ADT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Senstar Technologies (SNT) $36.40M, Adt (ADT) $4.67B, Icts International N V (ICTSF) $207.76M.

Which stock is cheaper, SNT, ADT and ICTSF?

Adt (ADT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 74.0x, Adt (ADT) 8.5x, Icts International N V (ICTSF) -14.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Adt (ADT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%, Adt (ADT) +2.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Adt (ADT) has the highest net margin (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%, Adt (ADT) 11.9%). On return on invested capital, Adt (ADT) leads (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.7%, Adt (ADT) 8.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Icts International N V (ICTSF) returned the most: Senstar Technologies (SNT) -67.9%, Adt (ADT) -21.3%, Icts International N V (ICTSF) +27.6%. Over five years, Adt (ADT) compounded fastest (Senstar Technologies (SNT) -16.9%/yr, Adt (ADT) -4.0%/yr, Icts International N V (ICTSF) -6.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.00%, Adt (ADT) 3.42%. Senstar Technologies (SNT) and Icts International N V (ICTSF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Adt (ADT) has been the steadiest (Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.0%, Adt (ADT) 29.8%, Icts International N V (ICTSF) 79.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SNT, ADT and ICTSF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Adt (ADT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.