SNPS vs DLB vs AIP Stock Comparison

Synopsys, Dolby Laboratories and Arteris Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (QCOM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SNPS Synopsys Inc
$474.42 +11.4% 1M +1.9% 1Y
Market cap
$92.03B
P/E
70.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.88B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
5 wins
DLB Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
$62.74 +7.0% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.79B
P/E
25.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.35B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
5 wins
AIP Arteris, Inc.
$20.95 -12.3% 1M +46.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.01B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$84.62M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Synopsys leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Synopsys 5, Dolby Laboratories 5, Arteris 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNPSDLBAIPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $92.03B $5.79B $1.01B SNPS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 70.7x 25.6x -25.5x DLB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 32.6x 14.0x — DLB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +38.0% +0.6% +33.8% SNPS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.7% 16.7% -46.7% DLB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.8% — -101.1% SNPS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.8x — 3.3x SNPS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.9% -7.2% +46.3% AIP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.7%/yr -6.4%/yr +3.0%/yr SNPS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.7% 30.2% 79.2% DLB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 66/100 29/100 DLB

Percentile Scorecard

SNPSDLBAIP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNPSDLBAIP
Valuation 42 #55 of 94 87 #13 of 94 11 #84 of 94
Growth 48 #48 of 92 25 #69 of 92 77 #22 of 92
Profitability 47 #48 of 90 72 #26 of 90 18 #74 of 90
Financial Health 18 #81 of 99 60 #40 of 99 27 #73 of 99
Shareholder Returns – 85 #12 of 73 11 #65 of 73
Overall 39 66 29
  • SNPS ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • DLB ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • AIP ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNPSDLBAIPSPY
1 month +11.4%+7.0%-12.3% -0.2%
3 months +23.6%+19.5%-27.7% +3.9%
6 months -2.0%-0.3%-18.3% +8.2%
Year to date +1.0%-2.3%+35.2% +12.9%
1 year +1.9%-7.2%+46.3% +12.3%
3 years +3.8%-20.2%+290.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +1.3%-7.3%+57.5% +23.3%
5 years +45.2%-28.2%+16.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +7.7%-6.4%+3.0% +10.9%
10 years +713.3%+29.9%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +23.3%+2.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSNPSDLBAIPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.7%30.2%79.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.7%31.5%81.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.680.543.62 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.04-0.240.58 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -42.3%-49.6%-87.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.3%-9.2%-56.9% -1.2%
52-week high $534.56$69.09$48.59 $779.14
52-week low $372.33$48.50$12.32 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNPSDLBAIP
P/E now vs peer median 69.8xmedian 45.6x 26.1xmedian 45.6x -25.1xmedian 45.6x
P/S now vs peer median 10.2xmedian 7.7x 4.4xmedian 7.7x 12.1xmedian 7.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 42.1xmedian 29.0x 15.8xmedian 29.0x -25.4xmedian 29.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 40.6x 15.1xmedian 40.6x 151.9xmedian 40.6x
P/B now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 4.6x 2.3xmedian 4.6x 15.2xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median 147.37median 2.28 12.55median 2.28 -6.64median 2.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNPSDLBAIP
Revenue $8.88B $1.35B $84.62M
Gross profit $6.53B $1.19B $74.13M
Operating income $847.20M $239.10M -$40.39M
Net income $1.30B $228.00M -$39.52M
Free cash flow – $392.67M $6.77M
R&D $2.81B $265.94M $57.09M
EPS (diluted) $6.77 $2.39 $-0.84
Cash & equivalents $3.61B $669.39M $93.27M
Total debt $10.04B – $3.50M
Shares (diluted) 192.32M 94.52M 47.28M
Enterprise value $88.42B $3.18B $754.19M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNPSDLBAIP
P/E 69.8x 26.1x -25.1x
P/FCF – 15.1x 151.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 13.5x 120.8x
P/S 10.2x 4.4x 12.1x
P/B 2.9x 2.3x 15.2x
P/Tangible book 4.6x 2.7x 21.0x
EV/EBITDA 42.1x 15.8x -25.4x
EV/EBIT 114.9x 21.9x -22.5x
EV/Revenue 11.0x 3.9x 10.7x
EV/FCF – 13.4x 134.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – 12.0x 106.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 147.37 12.55 -6.64

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNPSDLBAIP
Revenue growth (1Y) 38.0% 0.6% 33.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 22.8% 1.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.2% -0.5% 30.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.9% 1.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -23.3% -15.1% -30.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.0% -1.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) -34.9% -14.2% -19.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 1.3% -6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -45.2% -12.3% -5.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 0.5% 2.1% 3.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -6.0% 850.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.5% 36.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -10.4% 486.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.3% 33.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNPSDLBAIP
Gross margin 73.5% 87.6% 87.6%
EBITDA margin 26.0% 24.5% -42.4%
Operating margin 9.5% 17.7% -47.7%
Pretax margin 16.5% 20.4% -51.7%
Net margin 14.7% 16.7% -46.7%
FCF margin – 29.0% 8.0%
Operating cash flow margin – 32.3% 10.1%
Return on equity 4.2% 8.7% -117.0%
Return on assets 2.7% 7.1% -22.5%
Return on invested capital 1.8% – -101.1%
Return on capital employed 2.0% 8.6% -45.4%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.4x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.9x -0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 9.6% 25.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNPSDLBAIP
Debt / assets 21.0% – 1.6%
Debt / equity 0.3x – 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.8x – 3.3x
Debt / FCF – – 0.5x
Liabilities / assets 34.7% 17.9% 69.9%
Equity / assets 65.3% 82.1% 30.1%
Interest coverage 1.3x – -236.2x
Current ratio 1.3x 3.2x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.0x 3.1x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.7x 1.6x 1.3x
Altman Z-score 3.90 8.47 2.79

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNPSDLBAIP
Dividend yield – 2.3% –
Net buyback yield – 3.5% -7.3%
Shareholder yield – 5.8% -7.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 58.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 34.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 9.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNPSDLBAIP
Forward P/E 32.6xFY2026 14.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $14.56FY2026 $4.49FY2026 $-0.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.8%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +21.4% +4.7% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.20BFY2026 $1.50BFY2026 $91.38MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +44.6%FY2026 +11.1%FY2026 +29.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.8% -7.7% +22.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSNPSDLBAIP
Held by institutions 92.3% 100.0% 64.9%
Institutions holding 1,440 389 209
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.6% +5.8% +14.9%
Institutions buying 772 195 163
Institutions selling 493 148 40
Buyers to sellers 1.57 1.32 4.08

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNPSDLBAIP
SNPS 1.00 0.20 0.42
DLB 0.20 1.00 0.12
AIP 0.42 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SNPS, DLB and AIP?

Synopsys (SNPS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Synopsys (SNPS) $92.03B, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) $5.79B, Arteris (AIP) $1.01B.

Which stock is cheaper, SNPS, DLB and AIP?

Dolby Laboratories (DLB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Synopsys (SNPS) 70.7x, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 25.6x, Arteris (AIP) -25.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) is cheapest (Synopsys (SNPS) 32.6x, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 14.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Synopsys (SNPS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Synopsys (SNPS) +38.0%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) +0.6%, Arteris (AIP) +33.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Dolby Laboratories (DLB) has the highest net margin (Synopsys (SNPS) 14.7%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 16.7%, Arteris (AIP) -46.7%). On return on invested capital, Synopsys (SNPS) leads (Synopsys (SNPS) 1.8%, Arteris (AIP) -101.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Arteris (AIP) returned the most: Synopsys (SNPS) +1.9%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) -7.2%, Arteris (AIP) +46.3%. Over five years, Synopsys (SNPS) compounded fastest (Synopsys (SNPS) +7.7%/yr, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) -6.4%/yr, Arteris (AIP) +3.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Synopsys (SNPS) 0.00%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 0.02%, Arteris (AIP) 0.00%. Synopsys (SNPS) and Arteris (AIP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) has been the steadiest (Synopsys (SNPS) 44.7%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 30.2%, Arteris (AIP) 79.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SNPS, DLB and AIP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Synopsys (SNPS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.