SNOW vs NTAP vs SRAD Stock Comparison

Snowflake, NetApp and Sportradar Group AG Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ESTC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SNOW Snowflake Inc.
$325.44 -2.8% 1M +28.6% 1Y
Market cap
$116.93B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.43B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
2 wins
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$215.48 +9.8% 1M +82.9% 1Y
Market cap
$43.53B
P/E
30.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
8 wins
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$11.95 -9.3% 1M -56.4% 1Y
Market cap
$13.07B
P/E
655.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

NetApp leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (NetApp 8, Snowflake 2, Sportradar Group AG 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNOWNTAPSRADLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $116.93B $43.53B $13.07B SNOW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -107.2x 30.7x 655.2x NTAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 152.1x 20.5x 44.3x NTAP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.0% +12.2% +24.7% SNOW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -20.1% 19.2% 1.2% NTAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 36.7% -8.6% NTAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.5x 1.4x NTAP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.6% +82.9% -56.4% NTAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.9%/yr +18.3%/yr -11.6%/yr NTAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 63.1% 44.7% 56.2% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 57/100 59/100 SRAD

Percentile Scorecard

SNOWNTAPSRAD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNOWNTAPSRAD
Valuation 26 #92 of 124 43 #64 of 112 79 #27 of 124
Growth 69 #36 of 113 52 #53 of 109 63 #43 of 113
Profitability 50 #56 of 110 91 #10 of 105 71 #33 of 110
Financial Health 23 #100 of 129 28 #85 of 117 56 #58 of 129
Shareholder Returns 58 #29 of 68 70 #25 of 82 30 #48 of 68
Overall 45 57 59
  • SNOW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • NTAP ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNOWNTAPSRADSPY
1 month -2.8%+9.8%-9.3% -1.0%
3 months +21.4%+28.5%-16.4% +2.9%
6 months +131.9%+98.2%-10.1% +6.4%
Year to date +48.4%+101.2%-49.7% +11.4%
1 year +28.6%+82.9%-56.4% +13.1%
3 years +115.4%+191.8%+34.9% +79.4%
3 years, per year +29.2%+42.9%+10.5% +21.5%
5 years -4.2%+131.7%-46.0% +67.7%
5 years, per year -0.9%+18.3%-11.6% +10.9%
10 years —+535.3%— +255.2%
10 years, per year —+20.3%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureSNOWNTAPSRADSPY
Volatility, 1Y 63.1%44.7%56.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.8%38.6%64.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.351.340.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.451.86-1.00 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.0%-43.5%-69.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.8%-9.9%-56.4% -2.5%
52-week high $368.93$239.18$27.43 $779.14
52-week low $121.11$94.11$11.56 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNOWNTAPSRAD
P/E now vs peer median -104.2xmedian 37.4x 29.8xmedian 31.3x 621.4xmedian 37.4x
P/S now vs peer median 21.1xmedian 4.4x 5.7xmedian 2.6x 2.3xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -143.2xmedian 35.0x 20.3xmedian 19.6x -13.6xmedian 35.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 96.0xmedian 27.2x 25.6xmedian 28.3x 7.3xmedian 27.2x
P/B now vs peer median 53.4xmedian 3.4x 28.3xmedian 2.9x 4.2xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 17.64median 1.27 3.63median 1.15 21.46median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNOWNTAPSRAD
Revenue $5.43B $7.39B $1.62B
Gross profit $3.64B $5.22B –
Operating income -$1.24B $1.85B –
Net income -$1.09B $1.42B $19.94M
Free cash flow $1.20B $1.65B $510.26M
R&D $2.11B $1.02B $44.37M
EPS (diluted) $-3.12 $7.09 $64,328.88
Cash & equivalents $1.71B $1.57B $286.82M
Total debt – $9.95B $49.28M
Shares (diluted) 349.26M 200.00M 310.00
Enterprise value $104.25B $26.35B $11.35B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNOWNTAPSRAD
P/E -104.2x 29.8x 621.4x
P/FCF 96.0x 25.6x 7.3x
P/Operating cash flow 91.5x 22.3x 7.4x
P/S 21.1x 5.7x 2.3x
P/B 53.4x 28.3x 4.2x
P/Tangible book 66.6x 29.0x 4.2x
EV/EBITDA -143.2x 20.3x -13.6x
EV/EBIT -90.8x 22.3x -40.3x
EV/Revenue 20.7x 5.6x 2.1x
EV/FCF 94.0x 24.9x 6.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 89.7x 21.7x 6.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 17.64 3.63 21.46

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNOWNTAPSRAD
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.0% 12.2% 24.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 30.5% 6.0% 23.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 32.9% 13.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 31.0% 7.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.7% 35.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.2% 25.3% –
Net income growth (1Y) 21.1% 21.1% -83.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -8.2% 5.5% 51.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 24.1% 22.9% -94.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -5.9% 8.2% 28.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 49.6% 3.2% 15.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.7% 14.0% 30.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 59.1% -0.5% 15.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.4% 15.5% 30.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNOWNTAPSRAD
Gross margin 67.0% 70.6% –
EBITDA margin -14.4% 27.5% -15.4%
Operating margin -22.8% 25.0% –
Pretax margin -19.8% 24.7% 1.4%
Net margin -20.1% 19.2% 1.2%
FCF margin 22.0% 22.3% 31.6%
Operating cash flow margin 23.1% 25.7% 31.0%
Return on equity -53.2% 99.6% 2.1%
Return on assets -12.6% 13.1% 0.7%
Return on invested capital – 36.7% -8.6%
Return on capital employed -25.2% 29.4% -3.5%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.1x 1.3x 25.1x
Stock comp / revenue 30.2% 5.4% 4.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNOWNTAPSRAD
Debt / assets – 22.7% 0.4%
Debt / equity – 1.7x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.5x 1.4x
Debt / FCF – 1.5x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 75.3% 86.4% 69.5%
Equity / assets 24.7% 13.6% 30.5%
Interest coverage -148.8x – -0.8x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.2x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.0x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.8x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 8.99 4.06 1.72

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNOWNTAPSRAD
Dividend yield – 1.0% –
Net buyback yield 0.4% 1.8% -1.0%
Shareholder yield 0.4% 2.7% -1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNOWNTAPSRAD
Forward P/E 152.1xFY2026 20.5xFY2026 44.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.14FY2026 $10.49FY2026 $0.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +71.2%FY2026 +29.0%FY2026 -25.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +37.4% +8.5% +100.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.16BFY2026 $8.49BFY2026 $1.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +31.5%FY2026 +22.7%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +41.5% +8.4% +11.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSNOWNTAPSRAD
Held by institutions 79.8% 97.4% 17.8%
Institutions holding 1,459 959 151
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.1% -1.0% -2.8%
Institutions buying 850 501 88
Institutions selling 473 336 42
Buyers to sellers 1.80 1.49 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNOWNTAPSRAD
SNOW 1.00 0.26 0.17
NTAP 0.26 1.00 0.08
SRAD 0.17 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SNOW, NTAP and SRAD?

Snowflake (SNOW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Snowflake (SNOW) $116.93B, NetApp (NTAP) $43.53B, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $13.07B.

Which stock is cheaper, SNOW, NTAP and SRAD?

NetApp (NTAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Snowflake (SNOW) -107.2x, NetApp (NTAP) 30.7x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 655.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, NetApp (NTAP) is cheapest (Snowflake (SNOW) 152.1x, NetApp (NTAP) 20.5x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 44.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Snowflake (SNOW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Snowflake (SNOW) +32.0%, NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetApp (NTAP) has the highest net margin (Snowflake (SNOW) -20.1%, NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%). On return on invested capital, NetApp (NTAP) leads (NetApp (NTAP) 36.7%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -8.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetApp (NTAP) returned the most: Snowflake (SNOW) +28.6%, NetApp (NTAP) +82.9%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -56.4%. Over five years, NetApp (NTAP) compounded fastest (Snowflake (SNOW) -0.9%/yr, NetApp (NTAP) +18.3%/yr, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -11.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (Snowflake (SNOW) 63.1%, NetApp (NTAP) 44.7%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 56.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SNOW, NTAP and SRAD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetApp (NTAP) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.