SNOW vs MDB vs NTAP Stock Comparison

Snowflake, MongoDB and NetApp Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ESTC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SNOW Snowflake Inc.
$330.22 0.0% 1M +22.4% 1Y
Market cap
$106.72B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$5.43B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
2 wins
MDB MongoDB, Inc.
$384.95 +14.2% 1M +13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$28.25B
P/E
479.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.78B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
1 win
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$218.42 +4.4% 1M +91.4% 1Y
Market cap
$38.83B
P/E
27.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

NetApp leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (NetApp 6, Snowflake 2, MongoDB 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNOWMDBNTAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $106.72B $28.25B $38.83B SNOW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -97.8x 479.6x 27.4x NTAP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 154.3x 55.0x 20.8x NTAP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.0% +25.5% +12.2% SNOW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -20.1% 2.1% 19.2% NTAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 36.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -0.5x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +22.4% +13.0% +91.4% NTAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.4%/yr -5.9%/yr +19.6%/yr NTAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 63.2% 72.7% 44.9% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 73/100 58/100 MDB

Percentile Scorecard

SNOWMDBNTAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNOWMDBNTAP
Valuation 28 #90 of 124 46 #68 of 124 41 #67 of 112
Growth 68 #37 of 113 98 #3 of 113 53 #51 of 108
Profitability 50 #55 of 109 70 #33 of 109 93 #8 of 104
Financial Health 25 #96 of 127 80 #26 of 127 29 #83 of 116
Shareholder Returns 60 #26 of 63 69 #20 of 63 73 #22 of 78
Overall 46 73 58
  • SNOW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • MDB ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • NTAP ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNOWMDBNTAPSPY
1 month 0.0%+14.2%+4.4% +0.7%
3 months +10.8%+18.1%+25.5% +3.7%
6 months +142.0%+53.5%+97.2% +7.1%
Year to date +50.5%-8.3%+104.0% +12.8%
1 year +22.4%+13.0%+91.4% +11.9%
3 years +129.1%+14.5%+206.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +31.8%+4.6%+45.4% +22.8%
5 years -6.7%-26.2%+144.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year -1.4%-5.9%+19.6% +10.9%
10 years ——+547.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——+20.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSNOWMDBNTAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 63.2%72.7%44.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.7%76.8%38.9% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.351.911.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.360.182.04 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -73.0%-76.5%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.5%-18.5%-8.7% -1.2%
52-week high $368.93$472.29$239.18 $779.14
52-week low $121.11$225.95$94.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNOWMDBNTAP
P/E now vs peer median -105.7xmedian 39.0x 526.1xmedian 39.0x 30.2xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 21.4xmedian 4.6x 11.1xmedian 4.6x 5.8xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -145.3xmedian 32.7x 2,315xmedian 32.7x 20.5xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 97.4xmedian 27.4x 47.1xmedian 27.4x 25.9xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 54.1xmedian 3.2x 10.4xmedian 3.2x 28.6xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 17.90median 1.23 17.45median 1.23 3.68median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNOWMDBNTAP
Revenue $5.43B $2.78B $7.39B
Gross profit $3.64B $2.02B $5.22B
Operating income -$1.24B -$14.52M $1.85B
Net income -$1.09B $58.90M $1.42B
Free cash flow $1.20B $659.02M $1.65B
R&D $2.11B $780.02M $1.02B
EPS (diluted) $-3.12 $0.72 $7.09
Cash & equivalents $1.71B $1.00B $1.57B
Total debt – – $2.49B
Shares (diluted) 349.26M 82.00M 200.00M
Enterprise value $94.04B $18.72B $21.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNOWMDBNTAP
P/E -105.7x 526.1x 30.2x
P/FCF 97.4x 47.1x 25.9x
P/Operating cash flow 92.9x 46.5x 22.6x
P/S 21.4x 11.1x 5.8x
P/B 54.1x 10.4x 28.6x
P/Tangible book 67.5x 10.5x 29.4x
EV/EBITDA -145.3x 2,315x 20.5x
EV/EBIT -92.2x -1,969x 22.6x
EV/Revenue 21.0x 10.3x 5.6x
EV/FCF 95.4x 43.4x 25.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 91.0x 42.9x 22.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 17.90 17.45 3.68

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNOWMDBNTAP
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.0% 25.5% 12.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 30.5% 23.2% 6.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 32.9% 26.1% 13.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 31.0% 22.5% 7.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.7% 91.2% 35.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -7.2% 62.4% 25.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.1% 174.9% 21.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -8.2% 30.9% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 24.1% 174.1% 22.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -5.9% 30.1% 8.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 49.6% 146.9% 3.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.7% 139.5% 14.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 59.1% 174.7% -0.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.4% 144.3% 15.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNOWMDBNTAP
Gross margin 67.0% 72.7% 70.6%
EBITDA margin -14.4% 0.4% 27.5%
Operating margin -22.8% -0.5% 25.0%
Pretax margin -19.8% 2.7% 24.7%
Net margin -20.1% 2.1% 19.2%
FCF margin 22.0% 23.7% 22.3%
Operating cash flow margin 23.1% 24.0% 25.7%
Return on equity -53.2% 2.0% 99.6%
Return on assets -12.6% 1.6% 13.1%
Return on invested capital – – 36.7%
Return on capital employed -25.2% -0.5% 29.4%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.1x 11.3x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 30.2% 20.3% 5.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNOWMDBNTAP
Debt / assets – – 22.7%
Debt / equity – – 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -0.5x
Debt / FCF – – 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 75.3% 21.1% 86.4%
Equity / assets 24.7% 78.9% 13.6%
Interest coverage -148.8x -6.1x –
Current ratio 0.9x 4.9x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.8x 4.5x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.6x 3.8x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 9.14 24.15 4.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNOWMDBNTAP
Dividend yield – – 1.0%
Net buyback yield 0.4% 1.2% 1.7%
Shareholder yield 0.4% 1.2% 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNOWMDBNTAP
Forward P/E 154.3xFY2026 55.0xFY2026 20.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.14FY2026 $7.00FY2026 $10.50FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +71.2%FY2026 +40.8%FY2026 +29.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +36.9% +6.4% +8.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.16BFY2026 $2.89BFY2026 $8.49BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +31.5%FY2026 +17.5%FY2026 +22.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +41.5% +33.4% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSNOWMDBNTAP
Held by institutions 79.8% 92.6% 97.4%
Institutions holding 1,460 871 960
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.1% +4.3% -1.0%
Institutions buying 850 494 502
Institutions selling 474 278 336
Buyers to sellers 1.79 1.78 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNOWMDBNTAP
SNOW 1.00 0.61 0.26
MDB 0.61 1.00 0.23
NTAP 0.26 0.23 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SNOW, MDB and NTAP?

Snowflake (SNOW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Snowflake (SNOW) $106.72B, MongoDB (MDB) $28.25B, NetApp (NTAP) $38.83B.

Which stock is cheaper, SNOW, MDB and NTAP?

NetApp (NTAP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Snowflake (SNOW) -97.8x, MongoDB (MDB) 479.6x, NetApp (NTAP) 27.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, NetApp (NTAP) is cheapest (Snowflake (SNOW) 154.3x, MongoDB (MDB) 55.0x, NetApp (NTAP) 20.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Snowflake (SNOW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Snowflake (SNOW) +32.0%, MongoDB (MDB) +25.5%, NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetApp (NTAP) has the highest net margin (Snowflake (SNOW) -20.1%, MongoDB (MDB) 2.1%, NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetApp (NTAP) returned the most: Snowflake (SNOW) +22.4%, MongoDB (MDB) +13.0%, NetApp (NTAP) +91.4%. Over five years, NetApp (NTAP) compounded fastest (Snowflake (SNOW) -1.4%/yr, MongoDB (MDB) -5.9%/yr, NetApp (NTAP) +19.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (Snowflake (SNOW) 63.2%, MongoDB (MDB) 72.7%, NetApp (NTAP) 44.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SNOW, MDB and NTAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetApp (NTAP) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.