SND vs EAF vs USLM Stock Comparison

Smart Sand, Graftech International and United States Lime & Minerals Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MTRN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SND Smart Sand, Inc.
$4.95 -5.9% 1M +123.0% 1Y
Market cap
$190.80M
P/E
18.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$386.99M
Div. yield
–
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
5 wins
EAF Graftech International Ltd
$12.19 +22.5% 1M -9.6% 1Y
Market cap
$320.82M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$509.08M
Div. yield
–
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Smart Sand leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Smart Sand 5, United States Lime & Minerals 4, Graftech International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNDEAFUSLMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $190.80M $320.82M $3.26B USLM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.2x -1.6x 24.3x SND
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 22.6x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.5% -2.5% +7.0% SND
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.7% -38.4% 35.7% USLM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.1% -12.9% — SND
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x -23.1x — EAF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +123.0% -9.6% -15.4% SND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.8%/yr -35.3%/yr +34.7%/yr USLM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 70.7% 112.5% 38.9% USLM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 23/100 73/100 SND

Percentile Scorecard

SNDEAFUSLM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNDEAFUSLM
Valuation 96 #7 of 162 22 #126 of 162 49 #83 of 162
Growth 76 #36 of 147 7 #137 of 147 57 #64 of 147
Profitability 55 #55 of 122 24 #93 of 122 83 #22 of 122
Financial Health 44 #92 of 164 20 #131 of 164 96 #7 of 164
Shareholder Returns 94 #7 of 107 43 #62 of 107 79 #23 of 107
Overall 73 23 73
  • SND ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • EAF ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • USLM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNDEAFUSLMSPY
1 month -5.9%+22.5%-1.8% +0.9%
3 months +19.0%+72.7%-3.3% +5.9%
6 months -7.3%+40.4%-14.8% +8.5%
Year to date +23.8%-21.4%-8.7% +13.3%
1 year +123.0%-9.6%-15.4% +12.4%
3 years +145.0%-63.5%+184.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +34.8%-28.6%+41.7% +23.5%
5 years +117.1%-88.6%+342.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year +16.8%-35.3%+34.7% +11.0%
10 years ——+708.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——+23.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureSNDEAFUSLMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 70.7%112.5%38.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 80.9%129.3%44.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.102.001.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.74-0.09-0.39 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.3%-96.1%-45.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.9%-32.3%-21.6% -0.9%
52-week high $5.82$18.01$139.46 $779.14
52-week low $2.09$5.23$97.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNDEAFUSLM
P/E now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 13.4x -1.7xmedian 13.4x 23.3xmedian 13.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 3.2x 0.6xmedian 3.2x 8.3xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 7.3x -30.3xmedian 7.3x 14.8xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.6xmedian 14.8x -2.1xmedian 14.8x 34.2xmedian 14.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.3x -0.8xmedian 2.3x 4.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.95median 0.31 0.02median 0.31 0.83median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNDEAFUSLM
Revenue $386.99M $509.08M $376.92M
Gross profit $52.09M -$34.13M $182.84M
Operating income $7.85M -$107.10M $158.71M
Net income $10.49M -$195.63M $134.42M
Free cash flow $34.63M -$158.11M $91.81M
R&D – $6.05M –
EPS (diluted) $0.25 $-7.38 $4.67
Cash & equivalents $10.20M $134.31M $402.64M
Total debt $14.66M $1.20B –
Shares (diluted) 41.37M 26.51M 28.78M
Enterprise value $133.52M -$217.52M $1.75B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNDEAFUSLM
P/E 18.5x -1.7x 23.3x
P/FCF 5.6x -2.1x 34.2x
P/Operating cash flow 4.1x -2.9x 19.3x
P/S 0.5x 0.6x 8.3x
P/B 0.8x -0.8x 4.5x
P/Tangible book 0.8x -0.8x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 5.1x -30.3x 14.8x
EV/EBIT 25.2x -13.0x 17.2x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 2.7x 7.3x
EV/FCF 5.7x -8.8x 29.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 4.2x -12.3x 16.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.95 0.02 0.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNDEAFUSLM
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.5% -2.5% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.6% -11.4% 12.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 64.5% -1,814% 9.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.5% -30.9% 26.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 193.0% -70.6% 9.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 4.3% -57.0% 29.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 1,206% 4.2% 7.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.4% -72.9% 28.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 1,143% 6.3% 7.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.3% -71.1% 28.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 350.4% -29.5% 7.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.8% -43.6% 25.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 16,392% -31.3% -14.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.7% -79.2% 21.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNDEAFUSLM
Gross margin 13.5% -6.7% 48.5%
EBITDA margin 10.0% -9.0% 49.0%
Operating margin 2.0% -21.0% 42.1%
Pretax margin 1.9% -36.8% 45.7%
Net margin 2.7% -38.4% 35.7%
FCF margin 8.9% -31.1% 24.4%
Operating cash flow margin 12.1% -22.2% 43.1%
Return on equity 4.4% – 19.8%
Return on assets 3.1% -18.9% 18.4%
Return on invested capital 3.1% -12.9% –
Return on capital employed 2.7% -12.1% 22.3%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.5x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.5x 0.6x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 1.1% 2.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNDEAFUSLM
Debt / assets 4.2% 117.4% –
Debt / equity 0.1x -3.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x -23.1x –
Debt / FCF 0.4x -7.6x –
Liabilities / assets 31.4% 138.0% 6.9%
Equity / assets 68.6% -38.0% 93.1%
Interest coverage – -1.1x –
Current ratio 1.7x 3.5x 27.5x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.4x 25.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.9x 22.2x
Altman Z-score 2.66 -0.84 39.74

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNDEAFUSLM
Dividend yield 5.1% – 0.2%
Net buyback yield 0.8% -1.4% 0.1%
Shareholder yield 5.9% -1.4% 0.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 5.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 7.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 9.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 14.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNDEAFUSLM
Forward P/E – – 22.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.27FY2026 $-5.68FY2026 $4.84FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -1,000.0%FY2026 – +3.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +25.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $380.19MFY2026 $483.99MFY2026 $426.32MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.2%FY2026 -4.0%FY2026 +14.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +23.5% +16.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSNDEAFUSLM
Held by institutions 49.7% 41.3% 32.5%
Institutions holding 91 90 234
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.9% +2.5% +7.5%
Institutions buying 69 54 139
Institutions selling 17 22 66
Buyers to sellers 4.06 2.45 2.11

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNDEAFUSLM
SND 1.00 0.02 -0.18
EAF 0.02 1.00 0.13
USLM -0.18 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SND, EAF and USLM?

United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Smart Sand (SND) $190.80M, Graftech International (EAF) $320.82M, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) $3.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, SND, EAF and USLM?

Smart Sand (SND) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Smart Sand (SND) 18.2x, Graftech International (EAF) -1.6x, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 24.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Smart Sand (SND) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Smart Sand (SND) +26.5%, Graftech International (EAF) -2.5%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) has the highest net margin (Smart Sand (SND) 2.7%, Graftech International (EAF) -38.4%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 35.7%). On return on invested capital, Smart Sand (SND) leads (Smart Sand (SND) 3.1%, Graftech International (EAF) -12.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Smart Sand (SND) returned the most: Smart Sand (SND) +123.0%, Graftech International (EAF) -9.6%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) -15.4%. Over five years, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) compounded fastest (Smart Sand (SND) +16.8%/yr, Graftech International (EAF) -35.3%/yr, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) +34.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Smart Sand (SND) 0.00%, Graftech International (EAF) 0.00%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 0.00%. Smart Sand (SND) and Graftech International (EAF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) has been the steadiest (Smart Sand (SND) 70.7%, Graftech International (EAF) 112.5%, United States Lime & Minerals (USLM) 38.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SND, EAF and USLM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Smart Sand (SND) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.