SNA vs ITW vs MMM Stock Comparison

Snap-on, Illinois Tool Works and 3M Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SWK) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SNA Snap-on Inc
$362.22 -1.8% 1M +7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$19.13B
P/E
18.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.27B
Div. yield
–
Power Tools Industrials
6 wins
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc
$286.57 +9.0% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$83.43B
P/E
25.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.65B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins
MMM 3M Co
$177.04 +9.4% 1M +9.2% 1Y
Market cap
$100.34B
P/E
28.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Snap-on leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Snap-on 6, Illinois Tool Works 5, 3M 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSNAITWMMMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $19.13B $83.43B $100.34B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.9x 25.8x 28.4x SNA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.7x 26.9x 19.9x SNA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.9% +4.8% +1.7% ITW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 19.2% 19.4% 14.0% ITW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.1% 27.1% 22.0% ITW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x 1.8x 1.6x SNA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.02% ITW
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +7.2% +17.9% +9.2% ITW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +11.6%/yr +4.3%/yr +3.2%/yr SNA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 19.2% 21.7% 25.7% SNA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 74/100 50/100 49/100 SNA

Percentile Scorecard

SNAITWMMM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSNAITWMMM
Valuation 64 #74 of 204 29 #145 of 204 36 #132 of 204
Growth 33 #129 of 191 36 #123 of 191 63 #71 of 191
Profitability 97 #7 of 189 100 #2 of 189 87 #25 of 189
Financial Health 88 #27 of 221 27 #162 of 221 19 #180 of 221
Shareholder Returns 89 #18 of 158 59 #65 of 158 41 #93 of 158
Overall 74 50 49
  • SNA ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • ITW ranked among 223 companies in Machinery
  • MMM ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSNAITWMMMSPY
1 month -1.8%+9.0%+9.4% -2.0%
3 months -13.4%-2.8%-2.4% -2.2%
6 months -4.4%+12.6%+24.0% +4.2%
Year to date +5.1%+16.3%+10.6% +10.6%
1 year +7.2%+17.9%+9.2% +10.4%
3 years +33.7%+22.9%+125.6% +73.6%
3 years, per year +10.2%+7.1%+31.2% +20.2%
5 years +72.8%+23.2%+17.2% +61.6%
5 years, per year +11.6%+4.3%+3.2% +10.1%
10 years +137.1%+152.4%+26.9% +261.3%
10 years, per year +9.0%+9.7%+2.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSNAITWMMMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 19.2%21.7%25.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 19.2%20.8%24.4% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.570.460.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.380.820.36 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -21.3%-28.9%-53.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.6%-4.3%-3.7% -3.2%
52-week high $419.26$299.60$183.81 $779.14
52-week low $328.69$241.07$141.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSNAITWMMM
P/E now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 25.4x 25.3xmedian 25.4x 26.0xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 1.9x 4.9xmedian 1.9x 3.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.0xmedian 14.5x 18.6xmedian 14.5x 16.4xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.4xmedian 23.6x 28.4xmedian 23.6x 34.2xmedian 23.6x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.2x 25.9xmedian 2.2x 21.9xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 12.30median 1.21 8.73median 1.21 0.72median 1.21

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSNAITWMMM
Revenue $5.27B $16.65B $25.25B
Gross profit $2.45B $7.38B $9.98B
Operating income $1.31B $4.43B $4.74B
Net income $1.04B $3.23B $3.58B
Free cash flow $1.07B $2.87B $2.68B
R&D – – $1.21B
EPS (diluted) $19.30 $11.31 $6.77
Cash & equivalents $1.67B $809.00M $4.84B
Total debt $1.21B $9.37B $15.00B
Shares (diluted) 52.40M 285.30M 522.60M
Enterprise value $12.43B $80.11B $81.78B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSNAITWMMM
P/E 18.5x 25.3x 26.0x
P/FCF 17.4x 28.4x 34.2x
P/Operating cash flow 16.2x 25.0x 25.2x
P/S 3.5x 4.9x 3.6x
P/B 3.1x 25.9x 21.9x
P/Tangible book 3.2x 31.3x 43.2x
EV/EBITDA 13.0x 18.6x 16.4x
EV/EBIT 13.9x 20.3x 21.4x
EV/Revenue 3.5x 5.4x 4.0x
EV/FCF 17.0x 31.4x 37.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.8x 27.6x 27.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 12.30 8.73 0.72

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSNAITWMMM
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.9% 4.8% 1.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.3% 1.1% 10.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.2% 5.7% -1.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 1.7% 2.8% 17.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.7% 6.4% -3.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.4% 3.1% 33.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -0.3% 6.7% 4.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 0.6% 0.9% 35.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 0.7% 9.1% 7.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 2.9% 35.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 4.4% -0.5% 42.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.7% -0.5% -18.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 4.6% 0.8% 68.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.4% 0.4% -18.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSNAITWMMM
Gross margin 46.6% 44.3% 39.5%
EBITDA margin 26.6% 29.0% 24.4%
Operating margin 24.9% 26.6% 18.8%
Pretax margin 25.1% 25.2% 17.5%
Net margin 19.2% 19.4% 14.0%
FCF margin 20.4% 17.2% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 22.0% 19.6% 14.4%
Return on equity 17.0% 106.9% 101.3%
Return on assets 12.0% 19.6% 9.8%
Return on invested capital 14.1% 27.1% 22.0%
Return on capital employed 17.8% 38.9% 18.7%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 1.0x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.5% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSNAITWMMM
Debt / assets 13.9% 56.8% 37.9%
Debt / equity 0.2x 3.0x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x 1.8x 1.6x
Debt / FCF 1.1x 3.3x 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 29.3% 81.0% 89.5%
Equity / assets 70.7% 19.0% 10.5%
Interest coverage 25.9x 14.3x –
Current ratio 3.5x 1.3x 1.4x
Quick ratio 2.0x 0.8x 0.8x
Cash ratio 1.3x 0.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 7.35 8.31 4.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSNAITWMMM
Dividend yield 2.7% 2.3% 1.7%
Net buyback yield 1.9% 2.0% 3.0%
Shareholder yield 4.6% 4.3% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 57.4% 44.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 64.6% 59.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 5.2% 3.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 5.1% -21.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSNAITWMMM
Forward P/E 19.7xFY2026 26.9xFY2026 19.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $18.35FY2026 $10.67FY2026 $8.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -4.4%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +17.5% +19.3% +16.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.58BFY2026 $16.46BFY2026 $23.87BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.4%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.2% +11.4% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSNAITWMMM
Held by institutions 96.3% 84.9% 74.5%
Institutions holding 1,072 1,971 2,212
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +0.8% +0.8%
Institutions buying 499 847 916
Institutions selling 370 751 839
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.13 1.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SNAITWMMM
SNA 1.00 0.70 0.37
ITW 0.70 1.00 0.57
MMM 0.37 0.57 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SNA, ITW and MMM?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Snap-on (SNA) $19.13B, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) $83.43B, 3M (MMM) $100.34B.

Which stock is cheaper, SNA, ITW and MMM?

Snap-on (SNA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Snap-on (SNA) 18.9x, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 25.8x, 3M (MMM) 28.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Snap-on (SNA) is cheapest (Snap-on (SNA) 19.7x, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 26.9x, 3M (MMM) 19.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Snap-on (SNA) +2.9%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +4.8%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has the highest net margin (Snap-on (SNA) 19.2%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 19.4%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%). On return on invested capital, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) leads (Snap-on (SNA) 14.1%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 27.1%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Illinois Tool Works (ITW) returned the most: Snap-on (SNA) +7.2%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +17.9%, 3M (MMM) +9.2%. Over five years, Snap-on (SNA) compounded fastest (Snap-on (SNA) +11.6%/yr, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +4.3%/yr, 3M (MMM) +3.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has the highest dividend yield: Snap-on (SNA) 0.00%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 0.02%, 3M (MMM) 0.02%. Snap-on (SNA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Snap-on (SNA) has been the steadiest (Snap-on (SNA) 19.2%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 21.7%, 3M (MMM) 25.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SNA, ITW and MMM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Snap-on (SNA) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.