SMWB vs PLTR vs AMPL Stock Comparison

Similarweb, Palantir Technologies and Amplitude Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SMWB Similarweb Ltd.
$8.93 +17.0% 1M +1.4% 1Y
Market cap
$764.20M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$295.61M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
1 win
AMPL Amplitude, Inc.
$17.30 +30.1% 1M +70.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.24B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$374.37M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Palantir Technologies leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Palantir Technologies 6, Similarweb 1, Amplitude 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSMWBPLTRAMPLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $764.20M $480.88B $2.24B PLTR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -35.1x 159.4x -22.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 40.6x 119.8x 247.1x SMWB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.2% +78.9% +18.3% PLTR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -7.4% 49.0% -26.6% PLTR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.4% +7.7% +70.6% AMPL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -13.9%/yr +51.4%/yr -24.5%/yr PLTR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 81.3% 59.6% 65.9% PLTR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 37/100 69/100 42/100 PLTR

Percentile Scorecard

SMWBPLTRAMPL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSMWBPLTRAMPL
Valuation 34 #68 of 102 22 #80 of 102 16 #86 of 102
Growth 64 #36 of 98 100 #1 of 98 61 #39 of 98
Profitability 43 #55 of 95 96 #5 of 95 30 #67 of 95
Financial Health 23 #84 of 109 98 #3 of 109 59 #45 of 109
Shareholder Returns 22 #50 of 64 27 #47 of 64 46 #35 of 64
Overall 37 69 42
  • SMWB ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • PLTR ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • AMPL ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSMWBPLTRAMPLSPY
1 month +17.0%+4.8%+30.1% -0.8%
3 months +30.7%+51.2%+99.5% +3.5%
6 months +232.0%+39.0%+146.1% +7.0%
Year to date +19.2%+11.9%+49.4% +12.2%
1 year +1.4%+7.7%+70.6% +13.0%
3 years +75.4%+1,219.4%+72.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year +20.6%+136.4%+20.0% +23.1%
5 years -52.8%+693.5%-75.5% +68.6%
5 years, per year -13.9%+51.4%-24.5% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureSMWBPLTRAMPLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 81.3%59.6%65.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.3%56.1%64.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.791.971.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.020.131.07 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.4%-77.6%-93.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.7%-4.9%-0.7% -1.8%
52-week high $9.27$209.05$17.42 $779.14
52-week low $2.33$107.27$5.61 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSMWBPLTRAMPL
P/E now vs peer median -34.8xmedian 28.8x 158.2xmedian 28.8x -22.5xmedian 28.8x
P/S now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.8x 77.6xmedian 2.8x 11.5xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -305.6xmedian 17.7x 175.9xmedian 17.7x -44.9xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 50.3xmedian 15.8x 142.3xmedian 15.8x 146.7xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 34.1xmedian 3.2x 48.3xmedian 3.2x 31.7xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.15median 0.85 0.55median 0.85 -5.79median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSMWBPLTRAMPL
Revenue $295.61M $6.16B $374.37M
Gross profit $235.99M $5.22B $271.11M
Operating income -$11.06M $2.63B -$104.03M
Net income -$21.78M $3.03B -$99.53M
Free cash flow $15.44M $3.36B $29.44M
R&D $73.83M $641.24M $108.93M
EPS (diluted) $-0.26 $1.17 $-0.77
Cash & equivalents $73.90M $2.03B $73.78M
Shares (diluted) 84.82M 2.57B 129.38M
Enterprise value $487.16M $449.83B $1.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSMWBPLTRAMPL
P/E -34.8x 158.2x -22.5x
P/FCF 50.3x 142.3x 146.7x
P/Operating cash flow 54.8x 140.5x 136.0x
P/S 2.6x 77.6x 11.5x
P/B 34.1x 48.3x 31.7x
P/Tangible book 34.1x 48.3x 35.8x
EV/EBITDA -305.6x 175.9x -44.9x
EV/EBIT -63.5x 177.8x -40.2x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 76.1x 11.2x
EV/FCF 45.5x 139.5x 141.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 49.6x 137.7x 131.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.15 0.55 -5.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSMWBPLTRAMPL
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.2% 78.9% 18.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.5% 44.4% 12.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.1% 89.6% 15.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.6% 47.7% 13.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 50.2% 362.6% 2.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 42.5% 247.7% 1.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 25.1% 292.3% -3.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% 308.7% 0.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 28.7% 294.3% -4.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.2% 286.3% 3.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -30.9% 96.6% 48.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.8% 103.5% 61.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -29.0% 96.5% 50.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 33.7% 107.6% 74.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSMWBPLTRAMPL
Gross margin 79.8% 84.8% 72.4%
EBITDA margin -0.8% 43.3% -24.8%
Operating margin -3.7% 42.8% -27.8%
Pretax margin -5.9% 49.9% -25.5%
Net margin -7.4% 49.0% -26.6%
FCF margin 5.2% 54.6% 7.9%
Operating cash flow margin 4.8% 55.2% 8.5%
Return on equity -108.3% 32.9% -56.3%
Return on assets -8.8% 27.7% -26.3%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -19.5% 28.0% -61.7%
Asset turnover 1.1x 0.6x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.7x 1.1x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 6.2% 13.6% 25.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSMWBPLTRAMPL
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 91.9% 15.4% 61.8%
Equity / assets 8.1% 84.6% 38.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.8x 7.2x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.6x 7.1x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.3x 6.1x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 0.47 161.88 9.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSMWBPLTRAMPL
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.3% 0.0% 2.6%
Shareholder yield -0.3% 0.0% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSMWBPLTRAMPL
Forward P/E 40.6xFY2026 119.8xFY2026 247.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.22FY2026 $1.66FY2026 $0.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +266.7%FY2026 +121.3%FY2026 +16.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +36.4% +47.0% +157.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $332.14MFY2026 $8.41BFY2026 $430.21MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +17.5%FY2026 +87.8%FY2026 +25.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.8% +37.8% +15.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSMWBPLTRAMPL
Held by institutions 45.9% 60.3% 62.1%
Institutions holding 68 2,836 201
Change in shares held, QoQ -7.8% +10.9% -3.6%
Institutions buying 36 1,480 115
Institutions selling 18 1,093 62
Buyers to sellers 2.00 1.35 1.85

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SMWBPLTRAMPL
SMWB 1.00 0.25 0.19
PLTR 0.25 1.00 0.43
AMPL 0.19 0.43 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SMWB, PLTR and AMPL?

Palantir Technologies (PLTR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Similarweb (SMWB) $764.20M, Palantir Technologies (PLTR) $480.88B, Amplitude (AMPL) $2.24B.

Which company is growing faster?

Palantir Technologies (PLTR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Similarweb (SMWB) +10.2%, Palantir Technologies (PLTR) +78.9%, Amplitude (AMPL) +18.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Palantir Technologies (PLTR) has the highest net margin (Similarweb (SMWB) -7.4%, Palantir Technologies (PLTR) 49.0%, Amplitude (AMPL) -26.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Amplitude (AMPL) returned the most: Similarweb (SMWB) +1.4%, Palantir Technologies (PLTR) +7.7%, Amplitude (AMPL) +70.6%. Over five years, Palantir Technologies (PLTR) compounded fastest (Similarweb (SMWB) -13.9%/yr, Palantir Technologies (PLTR) +51.4%/yr, Amplitude (AMPL) -24.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Palantir Technologies (PLTR) has been the steadiest (Similarweb (SMWB) 81.3%, Palantir Technologies (PLTR) 59.6%, Amplitude (AMPL) 65.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SMWB, PLTR and AMPL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Palantir Technologies (PLTR) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.