SMFG vs MS Stock Comparison

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial and Morgan Stanley Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MS Morgan Stanley
$186.98 -4.7% 1M +12.6% 1Y
Market cap
$293.92B
P/E
14.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$80.16B
Div. yield
2.22%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Morgan Stanley leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Morgan Stanley 5, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSMFGMSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $92.82B $293.92B MS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.1x 14.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.5x 13.7x MS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +34.8% +16.2% SMFG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -42.5% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -0.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.20% 2.22% MS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +51.1% +12.6% SMFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +29.9%/yr +12.8%/yr SMFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.2% 28.4% MS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 22/100 53/100 MS

Percentile Scorecard

SMFGMS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSMFGMS
Valuation 44 #201 of 360 31 #248 of 360
Growth 33 #128 of 191 94 #13 of 191
Profitability 18 #138 of 168 –
Financial Health 5 #167 of 175 –
Shareholder Returns 12 #300 of 341 34 #225 of 341
Overall 22 53
  • SMFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MS ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSMFGMSSPY
1 month -8.8%-4.7% -0.2%
3 months -5.2%-11.6% +3.9%
6 months +15.8%-1.8% +8.2%
Year to date +25.5%+5.3% +12.9%
1 year +51.1%+12.6% +12.3%
3 years +152.3%+165.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +36.2%+38.5% +23.3%
5 years +270.2%+82.4% +67.9%
5 years, per year +29.9%+12.8% +10.9%
10 years +257.7%+452.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +13.6%+18.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSMFGMSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.2%28.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 28.2%29.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.111.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.750.44 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -30.0%-35.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.0%-18.2% -1.2%
52-week high $27.55$228.55 $779.14
52-week low $16.05$154.37 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSMFGMS
P/E now vs peer median -2.1xmedian 12.1x 14.6xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 3.4x 3.7xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 10.9x -16.3xmedian 10.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.08median 1.34 0.47median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSMFGMS
Revenue $103.68B $80.16B
Gross profit $67.73B –
Operating income -$30.78B –
Net income $11.49B –
EPS (diluted) $-11.47 $12.65
Total debt $397.48B –
Shares (diluted) 3.84B 1.57B
Enterprise value -$1.26T $293.92B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSMFGMS
P/E -2.1x 14.6x
P/FCF – -16.3x
P/Operating cash flow – –
P/S 0.9x 3.7x
P/B 1.3x –
P/Tangible book 1.3x –
EV/EBITDA – –
EV/EBIT -36.3x –
EV/Revenue 0.8x 3.7x
EV/FCF – –
EV/Operating cash flow – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.08 0.47

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSMFGMS
Revenue growth (1Y) 34.8% 16.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.6% 14.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -32.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -75.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 823.3% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 15.9% 29.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -25.7% 30.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSMFGMS
Gross margin 65.3% –
EBITDA margin – –
Operating margin -29.7% –
Pretax margin 14.5% –
Net margin -42.5% –
FCF margin – –
Operating cash flow margin – –
Return on equity 13.3% –
Return on assets 0.6% 1.2%
Return on invested capital -0.9% –
Return on capital employed – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – –
Stock comp / revenue – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSMFGMS
Debt / assets 5.0% –
Debt / equity 1.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA – –
Debt / FCF – –
Liabilities / assets 96.4% –
Equity / assets 3.6% –
Interest coverage -0.1x –
Current ratio – –
Quick ratio – –
Cash ratio – –
Altman Z-score – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSMFGMS
Dividend yield 1.2% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – –
Shareholder yield 1.2% 2.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSMFGMS
Forward P/E 14.5xFY2026 13.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.67FY2026 $13.66FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +28.5%FY2026 +33.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.4% -4.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $34.01BFY2026 $80.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -50.1%FY2026 +13.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.2% +13.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSMFGMS
Held by institutions 3.5% 85.7%
Institutions holding 459 2,742
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.9% +1.5%
Institutions buying 291 1,468
Institutions selling 91 939
Buyers to sellers 3.20 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SMFGMS
SMFG 1.00 0.45
MS 0.45 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SMFG and MS?

Morgan Stanley (MS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) $92.82B, Morgan Stanley (MS) $293.92B.

Which company is growing faster?

Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +34.8%, Morgan Stanley (MS) +16.2%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) returned the most: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +51.1%, Morgan Stanley (MS) +12.6%. Over five years, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) compounded fastest (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) +29.9%/yr, Morgan Stanley (MS) +12.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Morgan Stanley (MS) has the highest dividend yield: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) 1.20%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 2.22%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Morgan Stanley (MS) has been the steadiest (Sumitomo Mitsui Financial (SMFG) 29.2%, Morgan Stanley (MS) 28.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do SMFG and MS move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.45, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, SMFG and MS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Morgan Stanley (MS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.