SLDB vs KRYS vs IOVA Stock Comparison

Solid Biosciences, Krystal Biotech and Iovance Biotherapeutics Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
KRYS Krystal Biotech, Inc.
$321.42 -4.6% 1M +69.5% 1Y
Market cap
$9.54B
P/E
39.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$440.53M
Div. yield
–
Gene and Cell Therapy Healthcare
5 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Krystal Biotech leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Krystal Biotech 5, Iovance Biotherapeutics 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSLDBKRYSIOVALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $905.24M $9.54B $4.32B KRYS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.4x 39.5x -14.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 46.3x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +22.6% +34.5% IOVA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 54.8% -89.1% KRYS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +9.5% +69.5% +576.3% IOVA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.6%/yr +45.1%/yr -9.4%/yr KRYS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.6% 38.1% 99.0% KRYS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 85/100 64/100 KRYS

Percentile Scorecard

SLDBKRYSIOVA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSLDBKRYSIOVA
Valuation 35 #407 of 625 80 #127 of 625 67 #208 of 625
Growth 19 #486 of 602 93 #43 of 602 81 #113 of 602
Profitability 49 #279 of 549 96 #22 of 549 63 #206 of 549
Financial Health 88 #79 of 654 84 #104 of 654 64 #235 of 654
Shareholder Returns 20 #295 of 367 71 #109 of 367 45 #204 of 367
Overall 42 85 64
  • SLDB ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • KRYS ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • IOVA ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSLDBKRYSIOVASPY
1 month -11.0%-4.6%+34.8% +0.9%
3 months -19.4%-11.5%+224.8% +5.9%
6 months -8.1%+23.6%+347.4% +8.5%
Year to date +14.9%+30.4%+442.5% +13.3%
1 year +9.5%+69.5%+576.3% +12.4%
3 years +242.9%+181.6%+323.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year +50.8%+41.2%+61.8% +23.5%
5 years -78.7%+541.7%-39.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year -26.6%+45.1%-9.4% +11.0%
10 years ——+137.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year ——+9.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureSLDBKRYSIOVASPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.6%38.1%99.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 77.0%37.4%71.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.130.691.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.121.835.82 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -94.9%-44.5%-93.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.9%-15.0%-0.3% -0.9%
52-week high $11.15$378.15$14.86 $779.14
52-week low $3.93$185.05$1.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSLDBKRYSIOVA
P/E now vs peer median -4.5xmedian 17.4x 39.3xmedian 17.4x -23.0xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 9.1x 21.6xmedian 9.1x 20.6xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.6xmedian 17.1x 42.6xmedian 17.1x -24.2xmedian 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.0xmedian 19.0x 36.9xmedian 19.0x -22.6xmedian 19.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 2.2x 7.0xmedian 2.2x 9.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -0.14median 0.34 0.76median 0.34 -0.77median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSLDBKRYSIOVA
Revenue – $440.53M $324.97M
Gross profit – $416.91M $157.29M
Operating income -$212.15M $197.75M -$301.31M
Net income -$207.10M $241.47M -$289.51M
Free cash flow -$187.82M $257.78M -$296.40M
R&D $167.40M $59.23M $267.72M
EPS (diluted) $-1.44 $7.88 $-0.64
Cash & equivalents $159.39M $427.74M $110.80M
Shares (diluted) 143.69M 30.66M 450.19M
Enterprise value -$277.11M $6.31B $3.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSLDBKRYSIOVA
P/E -4.5x 39.3x -23.0x
P/FCF -5.0x 36.9x -22.6x
P/Operating cash flow -5.0x 34.9x -25.4x
P/S – 21.6x 20.6x
P/B 2.5x 7.0x 9.1x
P/Tangible book 2.5x 7.0x 14.2x
EV/EBITDA -2.6x 42.6x -24.2x
EV/EBIT -2.6x 43.8x -21.3x
EV/Revenue – 19.7x 19.7x
EV/FCF -2.9x 33.6x -21.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -3.0x 31.8x -24.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.14 0.76 -0.77

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSLDBKRYSIOVA
Revenue growth (1Y) – 22.6% 34.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 1,009%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 24.3% 95.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -35.3% 41.8% 26.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -22.8% 48.8% 11.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -34.4% 64.6% 25.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -31.9% 54.9% 11.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 11.9% 59.7% 44.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 32.0% 51.8% 29.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -52.4% 39.4% 12.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -19.2% 67.0% 7.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -52.3% 39.0% 8.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -18.4% 58.6% 5.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSLDBKRYSIOVA
Gross margin – 94.6% 48.4%
EBITDA margin – 46.2% -81.4%
Operating margin – 44.9% -92.7%
Pretax margin – 51.4% -90.4%
Net margin – 54.8% -89.1%
FCF margin – 58.5% -91.2%
Operating cash flow margin – 61.8% -81.3%
Return on equity -55.4% 18.3% -39.7%
Return on assets -49.1% 16.7% -31.4%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -54.0% 15.0% -37.0%
Asset turnover – 0.3x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.1x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 12.4% 14.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSLDBKRYSIOVA
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 11.1% 9.4% 19.6%
Equity / assets 88.9% 90.6% 80.4%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 13.8x 8.3x 4.3x
Quick ratio 13.2x 7.7x 3.7x
Cash ratio 13.2x 6.6x 2.8x
Altman Z-score – 41.93 17.73

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSLDBKRYSIOVA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -25.8% -0.4% -4.4%
Shareholder yield -25.8% -0.4% -4.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSLDBKRYSIOVA
Forward P/E – 46.3xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.63FY2026 $6.94FY2026 $-0.47FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +1.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +25.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2026 $514.54MFY2026 $434.71MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +32.2%FY2026 +65.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +33.4% +33.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSLDBKRYSIOVA
Held by institutions 79.7% 99.8% 63.3%
Institutions holding 157 421 292
Change in shares held, QoQ +18.9% +4.6% +6.5%
Institutions buying 101 271 174
Institutions selling 37 106 66
Buyers to sellers 2.73 2.56 2.64

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SLDBKRYSIOVA
SLDB 1.00 0.32 0.29
KRYS 0.32 1.00 0.11
IOVA 0.29 0.11 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SLDB, KRYS and IOVA?

Krystal Biotech (KRYS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Solid Biosciences (SLDB) $905.24M, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) $9.54B, Iovance Biotherapeutics (IOVA) $4.32B.

Which company is growing faster?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (IOVA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Krystal Biotech (KRYS) +22.6%, Iovance Biotherapeutics (IOVA) +34.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Krystal Biotech (KRYS) has the highest net margin (Krystal Biotech (KRYS) 54.8%, Iovance Biotherapeutics (IOVA) -89.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Iovance Biotherapeutics (IOVA) returned the most: Solid Biosciences (SLDB) +9.5%, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) +69.5%, Iovance Biotherapeutics (IOVA) +576.3%. Over five years, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) compounded fastest (Solid Biosciences (SLDB) -26.6%/yr, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) +45.1%/yr, Iovance Biotherapeutics (IOVA) -9.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) has been the steadiest (Solid Biosciences (SLDB) 78.6%, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) 38.1%, Iovance Biotherapeutics (IOVA) 99.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SLDB, KRYS and IOVA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Krystal Biotech (KRYS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.