SKT vs PECO vs KIM Stock Comparison

Tanger, Phillips Edison & Company and Kimco Realty Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MAC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SKT Tanger Inc.
$38.45 +11.2% 1M +14.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.42B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$612.31M
Div. yield
3.18%
Retail REITs Real Estate
5 wins
KIM Kimco Realty Corp
$25.89 +17.4% 1M +26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$17.20B
P/E
24.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.20B
Div. yield
4.09%
Retail REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Kimco Realty leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Kimco Realty 5, Tanger 5, Phillips Edison & Company 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSKTPECOKIMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.42B $5.31B $17.20B KIM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.9x 29.2x 24.0x SKT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.0x 51.4x 32.0x KIM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.4% +7.0% +3.5% SKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 40.3% 23.9% 32.7% SKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 4.6% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x — 5.2x SKT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.18% 3.24% 4.09% KIM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +14.2% +20.9% +26.7% KIM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.5%/yr +4.1%/yr +1.2%/yr SKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.1% 16.6% 18.6% PECO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 50/100 67/100 KIM

Percentile Scorecard

SKTPECOKIM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSKTPECOKIM
Valuation 70 #45 of 146 22 #114 of 146 48 #76 of 146
Growth 77 #34 of 145 74 #38 of 145 75 #37 of 145
Profitability 99 #3 of 141 56 #63 of 141 79 #30 of 141
Financial Health 48 #77 of 146 57 #63 of 146 64 #53 of 146
Shareholder Returns 10 #123 of 136 42 #79 of 136 70 #41 of 136
Overall 61 50 67
  • SKT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • PECO ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • KIM ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSKTPECOKIMSPY
1 month +11.2%+10.1%+17.4% -1.0%
3 months -5.2%-1.1%+4.2% -0.4%
6 months +4.3%+2.1%+8.8% +4.5%
Year to date +15.2%+15.7%+27.7% +12.4%
1 year +14.2%+20.9%+26.7% +13.6%
3 years +60.7%+17.2%+38.1% +76.4%
3 years, per year +17.2%+5.4%+11.4% +20.8%
5 years +80.1%+22.3%+6.4% +63.7%
5 years, per year +12.5%+4.1%+1.2% +10.4%
10 years +16.1%—+3.2% +267.7%
10 years, per year +1.5%—+0.3% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureSKTPECOKIMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.1%16.6%18.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 19.0%14.4%16.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.25-0.080.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.671.251.44 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.8%-24.2%-37.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.7%-6.5%-1.9% -1.6%
52-week high $42.10$44.01$26.39 $779.14
52-week low $31.63$34.04$19.78 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSKTPECOKIM
P/E now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 26.6x 29.2xmedian 26.6x 24.0xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 7.2xmedian 4.3x 7.0xmedian 4.3x 7.8xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.6xmedian 14.7x —median 14.7x 16.3xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.7xmedian 22.1x -17.4xmedian 22.1x 26.2xmedian 22.1x
P/B now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 1.3x 2.0xmedian 1.3x 1.7xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.04median 2.01 0.66median 2.01 1.63median 2.01

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSKTPECOKIM
Revenue $612.31M $761.31M $2.20B
Operating income – – $881.20M
Net income $246.96M $199.72M $755.69M
Free cash flow $323.28M -$305.42M $657.16M
EPS (diluted) $2.13 $1.29 $1.07
Cash & equivalents $176.88M $8.90M $544.92M
Total debt $1.62B $2.52B $8.47B
Shares (diluted) 115.73M 141.31M 669.19M
Enterprise value $3.99B $5.57B $15.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSKTPECOKIM
P/E 17.9x 29.2x 24.0x
P/FCF 13.7x -17.4x 26.2x
P/Operating cash flow 7.4x 14.9x 13.9x
P/S 7.2x 7.0x 7.8x
P/B 6.3x 2.0x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 6.3x 2.5x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 12.6x – 16.3x
EV/EBIT 19.8x – 28.5x
EV/Revenue 9.5x 10.3x 11.4x
EV/FCF 18.1x -25.6x 38.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.8x 22.0x 20.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.04 0.66 1.63

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSKTPECOKIM
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.4% 7.0% 3.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 8.2% 7.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 19.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 12.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.3% 120.5% 24.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 45.9% 16.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 19.5% 118.0% 28.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.8% 44.2% 14.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.4% 5.7% 12.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.9% 8.1% 6.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 63.7% -77.2% 39.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.6% -94.4% 19.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSKTPECOKIM
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 75.4% – 70.0%
Operating margin – – 40.1%
Pretax margin 36.4% – 27.1%
Net margin 40.3% 23.9% 32.7%
FCF margin 52.8% -40.1% 29.9%
Operating cash flow margin 97.5% 46.6% 56.3%
Return on equity 18.9% 7.4% 7.3%
Return on assets 4.6% 3.6% 3.8%
Return on invested capital – – 4.6%
Return on capital employed – – 4.4%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 1.8x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 4.3% 1.6% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSKTPECOKIM
Debt / assets 56.6% 45.4% 43.0%
Debt / equity 2.3x 0.9x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x – 5.2x
Debt / FCF 5.0x -8.3x 12.9x
Liabilities / assets 75.5% 51.4% 47.7%
Equity / assets 24.5% 48.6% 52.3%
Interest coverage 4.1x – 2.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – 13.7x
Cash ratio – – 8.0x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSKTPECOKIM
Dividend yield 3.2% 3.2% 4.1%
Net buyback yield -1.1% -1.6% 2.3%
Shareholder yield 2.1% 1.7% 6.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 83.2% 98.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – -54.4% 113.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.0% 4.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 7.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSKTPECOKIM
Forward P/E 35.0xFY2026 51.4xFY2026 32.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.10FY2026 $0.80FY2026 $0.81FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.1%FY2026 -10.1%FY2026 -1.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.0% +1.2% +7.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $638.63MFY2026 $741.12MFY2026 $2.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.9%FY2026 +4.5%FY2026 +0.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -9.1% +3.5% +4.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSKTPECOKIM
Held by institutions 93.8% 89.1% 99.4%
Institutions holding 362 446 695
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +5.8% +1.8%
Institutions buying 173 225 370
Institutions selling 122 134 202
Buyers to sellers 1.42 1.68 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SKTPECOKIM
SKT 1.00 0.66 0.69
PECO 0.66 1.00 0.78
KIM 0.69 0.78 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SKT, PECO and KIM?

Kimco Realty (KIM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tanger (SKT) $4.42B, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) $5.31B, Kimco Realty (KIM) $17.20B.

Which stock is cheaper, SKT, PECO and KIM?

Tanger (SKT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tanger (SKT) 17.9x, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 29.2x, Kimco Realty (KIM) 24.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kimco Realty (KIM) is cheapest (Tanger (SKT) 35.0x, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 51.4x, Kimco Realty (KIM) 32.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tanger (SKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tanger (SKT) +11.4%, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) +7.0%, Kimco Realty (KIM) +3.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tanger (SKT) has the highest net margin (Tanger (SKT) 40.3%, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 23.9%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 32.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kimco Realty (KIM) returned the most: Tanger (SKT) +14.2%, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) +20.9%, Kimco Realty (KIM) +26.7%. Over five years, Tanger (SKT) compounded fastest (Tanger (SKT) +12.5%/yr, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) +4.1%/yr, Kimco Realty (KIM) +1.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kimco Realty (KIM) has the highest dividend yield: Tanger (SKT) 3.18%, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 3.24%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 4.09%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) has been the steadiest (Tanger (SKT) 21.1%, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 16.6%, Kimco Realty (KIM) 18.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SKT, PECO and KIM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kimco Realty (KIM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.