SKT vs BRX vs PECO Stock Comparison

Tanger, Brixmor Property and Phillips Edison & Company Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (UE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SKT Tanger Inc.
$38.35 +9.8% 1M +13.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.41B
P/E
17.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$612.31M
Div. yield
3.19%
Retail REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Tanger leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Tanger 5, Brixmor Property 3, Phillips Edison & Company 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSKTBRXPECOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.41B $9.18B $5.28B BRX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.8x 21.6x 29.0x SKT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.9x 26.7x 47.6x BRX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.4% +5.7% +7.0% SKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 40.3% 30.0% 23.9% SKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.19% 4.14% 3.26% BRX
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.2% +14.2% +19.9% PECO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.4%/yr +3.2%/yr +4.0%/yr SKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.1% 17.8% 16.7% PECO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 48/100 51/100 SKT

Percentile Scorecard

SKTBRXPECO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSKTBRXPECO
Valuation 69 #46 of 146 28 #105 of 146 23 #113 of 146
Growth 77 #34 of 145 54 #68 of 145 74 #38 of 145
Profitability 98 #4 of 141 88 #18 of 141 56 #63 of 141
Financial Health 48 #77 of 146 19 #119 of 146 58 #62 of 146
Shareholder Returns 10 #122 of 136 53 #64 of 136 44 #77 of 136
Overall 60 48 51
  • SKT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • BRX ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • PECO ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSKTBRXPECOSPY
1 month +9.8%+9.0%+9.0% -5.9%
3 months -2.4%-0.6%+0.4% -4.6%
6 months +5.6%-0.5%+2.1% +0.2%
Year to date +14.9%+14.1%+15.0% +7.5%
1 year +13.2%+14.2%+19.9% +8.2%
3 years +62.7%+40.1%+19.7% +68.3%
3 years, per year +17.6%+11.9%+6.2% +19.0%
5 years +79.6%+17.3%+21.6% +56.5%
5 years, per year +12.4%+3.2%+4.0% +9.4%
10 years +15.8%+24.6%— +251.5%
10 years, per year +1.5%+2.2%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureSKTBRXPECOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.1%17.8%16.7% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 18.9%16.5%14.3% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.230.04-0.06 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.620.801.19 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.8%-32.4%-24.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.9%-8.4%-7.1% -5.9%
52-week high $42.10$32.67$44.01 $779.14
52-week low $31.63$24.67$34.12 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSKTBRXPECO
P/E now vs peer median 17.8xmedian 26.5x 21.6xmedian 26.5x 29.0xmedian 26.5x
P/S now vs peer median 7.2xmedian 4.2x 6.5xmedian 4.2x 6.9xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 12.6xmedian 14.4x —median 14.4x —median 14.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 21.7x 115.0xmedian 21.7x -17.3xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 1.3x 3.0xmedian 1.3x 2.0xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.03median 1.78 3.00median 1.78 0.66median 1.78

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSKTBRXPECO
Revenue $612.31M $1.42B $761.31M
Net income $246.96M $426.69M $199.72M
Free cash flow $323.28M $79.88M -$305.42M
EPS (diluted) $2.13 $1.38 $1.29
Cash & equivalents $176.88M $164.43M $8.90M
Total debt $1.62B $5.32B $2.52B
Shares (diluted) 115.73M 308.14M 141.31M
Enterprise value $3.98B $8.22B $5.54B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSKTBRXPECO
P/E 17.8x 21.6x 29.0x
P/FCF 13.6x 115.0x -17.3x
P/Operating cash flow 7.4x 13.3x 14.9x
P/S 7.2x 6.5x 6.9x
P/B 6.3x 3.0x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 6.3x 3.0x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA 12.6x – –
EV/EBIT 19.8x – –
EV/Revenue 9.5x 10.1x 10.2x
EV/FCF 18.0x 179.6x -25.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.8x 20.8x 21.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.03 3.00 0.66

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSKTBRXPECO
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.4% 5.7% 7.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 4.8% 8.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 21.3% 28.3% 120.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 7.9% 45.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 19.5% 28.1% 118.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.8% 7.2% 44.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.4% 8.4% 5.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.9% 5.9% 8.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 63.7% 153.2% -77.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.6% -29.2% -94.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSKTBRXPECO
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 75.4% – –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 36.4% – –
Net margin 40.3% 30.0% 23.9%
FCF margin 52.8% 5.6% -40.1%
Operating cash flow margin 97.5% 48.4% 46.6%
Return on equity 18.9% 14.1% 7.4%
Return on assets 4.6% 4.7% 3.6%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 1.6x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 4.3% 1.0% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSKTBRXPECO
Debt / assets 56.6% 59.0% 45.4%
Debt / equity 2.3x 1.8x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x – –
Debt / FCF 5.0x 66.6x -8.3x
Liabilities / assets 75.5% 66.5% 51.4%
Equity / assets 24.5% 33.5% 48.6%
Interest coverage 4.1x – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSKTBRXPECO
Dividend yield 3.2% 4.1% 3.3%
Net buyback yield -1.1% 0.0% -1.6%
Shareholder yield 2.1% 4.1% 1.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 87.7% 83.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 468.5% -54.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.4% 7.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.6% 7.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSKTBRXPECO
Forward P/E 34.9xFY2026 26.7xFY2026 47.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.10FY2026 $1.12FY2026 $0.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.1%FY2026 -10.4%FY2026 -3.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.0% -6.3% -5.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $638.63MFY2026 $1.49BFY2026 $741.74MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +15.9%FY2026 +8.6%FY2026 +4.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -9.1% +8.0% +3.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSKTBRXPECO
Held by institutions 93.8% 100.0% 89.1%
Institutions holding 362 477 446
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +3.6% +5.8%
Institutions buying 173 244 225
Institutions selling 122 159 134
Buyers to sellers 1.42 1.53 1.68

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SKTBRXPECO
SKT 1.00 0.71 0.67
BRX 0.71 1.00 0.80
PECO 0.67 0.80 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SKT, BRX and PECO?

Brixmor Property (BRX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Tanger (SKT) $4.41B, Brixmor Property (BRX) $9.18B, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) $5.28B.

Which stock is cheaper, SKT, BRX and PECO?

Tanger (SKT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Tanger (SKT) 17.8x, Brixmor Property (BRX) 21.6x, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 29.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Brixmor Property (BRX) is cheapest (Tanger (SKT) 34.9x, Brixmor Property (BRX) 26.7x, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 47.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tanger (SKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Tanger (SKT) +11.4%, Brixmor Property (BRX) +5.7%, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) +7.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tanger (SKT) has the highest net margin (Tanger (SKT) 40.3%, Brixmor Property (BRX) 30.0%, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 23.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) returned the most: Tanger (SKT) +13.2%, Brixmor Property (BRX) +14.2%, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) +19.9%. Over five years, Tanger (SKT) compounded fastest (Tanger (SKT) +12.4%/yr, Brixmor Property (BRX) +3.2%/yr, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) +4.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Brixmor Property (BRX) has the highest dividend yield: Tanger (SKT) 3.19%, Brixmor Property (BRX) 4.14%, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 3.26%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) has been the steadiest (Tanger (SKT) 21.1%, Brixmor Property (BRX) 17.8%, Phillips Edison & Company (PECO) 16.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SKT, BRX and PECO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tanger (SKT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.