SCHW vs GS vs MUFG Stock Comparison

Schwab Charles, Goldman Sachs and Mitsubishi Ufj Financial Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (HSBC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SCHW Schwab Charles Corp
$89.26 -7.7% 1M -4.2% 1Y
Market cap
$162.03B
P/E
16.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.03B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$895.85 -0.8% 1M +14.0% 1Y
Market cap
$274.53B
P/E
12.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Goldman Sachs leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Goldman Sachs 4, Schwab Charles 4, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSCHWGSMUFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $162.03B $274.53B $250.56B GS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.7x 12.9x 16.6x GS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.4x 11.9x 12.4x GS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.3% +18.7% -12.0% SCHW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 37.4% 30.6% 47.7% MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.0% 13.9% 3.7% SCHW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x -5.6x — GS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -4.2% +14.0% +40.1% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.8%/yr +17.0%/yr +30.5%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.8% 32.1% 26.4% SCHW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 36/100 36/100 SCHW

Percentile Scorecard

SCHWGSMUFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSCHWGSMUFG
Valuation 8 #333 of 360 15 #305 of 360 27 #262 of 360
Growth 60 #138 of 344 50 #172 of 344 74 #89 of 344
Profitability 90 #36 of 345 17 #288 of 345 62 #131 of 345
Financial Health 39 #206 of 339 12 #298 of 339 4 #326 of 339
Shareholder Returns 80 #72 of 352 87 #47 of 352 11 #314 of 352
Overall 55 36 36
  • SCHW ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSCHWGSMUFGSPY
1 month -7.7%-0.8%-6.8% -2.0%
3 months -16.1%-15.0%-2.5% -2.2%
6 months -3.4%-2.5%+19.7% +4.2%
Year to date -10.7%+1.9%+34.0% +10.6%
1 year -4.2%+14.0%+40.1% +10.4%
3 years +59.9%+173.4%+141.9% +73.6%
3 years, per year +16.9%+39.9%+34.3% +20.2%
5 years +9.6%+119.5%+278.3% +61.6%
5 years, per year +1.8%+17.0%+30.5% +10.1%
10 years +186.5%+408.4%+320.2% +261.3%
10 years, per year +11.1%+17.7%+15.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureSCHWGSMUFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.8%32.1%26.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.3%32.8%26.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.421.660.93 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.160.441.52 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -50.4%-31.5%-35.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.5%-22.2%-11.9% -3.2%
52-week high $113.68$1,152.07$24.14 $779.14
52-week low $85.35$773.70$14.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSCHWGSMUFG
P/E now vs peer median 15.9xmedian 12.4x 12.4xmedian 12.4x 16.1xmedian 12.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 3.5x 3.7xmedian 3.5x 8.0xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 4.9x -3.0xmedian 4.9x —median 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.3xmedian 11.0x -6.5xmedian 11.0x —median 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 1.2x 2.1xmedian 1.2x 2.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.89median 1.33 0.25median 1.33 0.27median 1.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSCHWGSMUFG
Revenue $26.03B $69.70B $31.62B
Gross profit – – $29.85B
Operating income – – $18.02B
Net income $10.10B $22.17B $13.97B
Free cash flow $10.79B -$39.98B –
EPS (diluted) $5.59 $70.77 $1.32
Cash & equivalents $40.58B $176.77B –
Total debt $37.11B $444.82B $112.96B
Shares (diluted) 1.74B 301.10M 11.40B
Enterprise value -$125.35M -$3.47T -$90.83B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSCHWGSMUFG
P/E 15.9x 12.4x 16.1x
P/FCF 14.3x -6.5x –
P/Operating cash flow 13.5x -6.8x –
P/S 5.9x 3.7x 8.0x
P/B 3.1x 2.1x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 3.6x 2.1x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 8.5x -3.0x –
EV/EBIT 9.2x -3.1x 4.6x
EV/Revenue 5.8x -4.4x 2.6x
EV/FCF 14.0x 7.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 13.2x 8.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.89 0.25 0.27

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSCHWGSMUFG
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.3% 18.7% -12.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.8% 15.3% -2.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 38.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 7.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 24.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 12.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 38.6% 33.0% 62.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 13.6% 41.4% 32.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 200.1% 40.7% 104.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.8% 49.9% 59.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -35.9% -311.6% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -0.3% -29.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -37.2% -353.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.4% -26.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSCHWGSMUFG
Gross margin – – 94.4%
EBITDA margin 68.2% 144.7% –
Operating margin – – 57.0%
Pretax margin 50.2% 40.0% 59.6%
Net margin 37.4% 30.6% 47.7%
FCF margin 41.5% -57.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 43.9% -54.3% –
Return on equity 20.3% 17.9% 11.7%
Return on assets 2.0% 1.0% 0.5%
Return on invested capital 15.0% 13.9% 3.7%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -1.7x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 5.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSCHWGSMUFG
Debt / assets 7.2% 20.4% 4.2%
Debt / equity 0.7x 3.6x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x -5.6x –
Debt / FCF 3.4x -11.1x –
Liabilities / assets 90.3% 94.3% 96.0%
Equity / assets 9.7% 5.7% 4.0%
Interest coverage 4.9x 1.4x 0.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSCHWGSMUFG
Dividend yield 1.4% 2.0% 1.5%
Net buyback yield 5.7% 5.9% –
Shareholder yield 7.1% 8.0% 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSCHWGSMUFG
Forward P/E 13.4xFY2026 11.9xFY2026 12.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.66FY2026 $75.07FY2026 $1.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +36.8%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026 +27.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +13.1% -6.8% +0.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $30.04BFY2026 $68.80BFY2026 $44.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.6%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.1% +4.5% +4.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSCHWGSMUFG
Held by institutions 83.0% 72.1% 3.0%
Institutions holding 2,320 3,153 576
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.1% +1.1% -0.1%
Institutions buying 1,082 1,555 325
Institutions selling 953 1,125 161
Buyers to sellers 1.14 1.38 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SCHWGSMUFG
SCHW 1.00 0.29 0.24
GS 0.29 1.00 0.47
MUFG 0.24 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SCHW, GS and MUFG?

Goldman Sachs (GS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Schwab Charles (SCHW) $162.03B, Goldman Sachs (GS) $274.53B, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $250.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, SCHW, GS and MUFG?

Goldman Sachs (GS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Schwab Charles (SCHW) 16.7x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.9x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Goldman Sachs (GS) is cheapest (Schwab Charles (SCHW) 13.4x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 11.9x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Schwab Charles (SCHW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Schwab Charles (SCHW) +20.3%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Schwab Charles (SCHW) 37.4%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 30.6%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%). On return on invested capital, Schwab Charles (SCHW) leads (Schwab Charles (SCHW) 15.0%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 13.9%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Schwab Charles (SCHW) -4.2%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +14.0%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +40.1%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Schwab Charles (SCHW) +1.8%/yr, Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.0%/yr, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +30.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Schwab Charles (SCHW) has been the steadiest (Schwab Charles (SCHW) 25.8%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 32.1%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SCHW, GS and MUFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Goldman Sachs (GS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.