SCHL vs ZD vs NYT Stock Comparison

Scholastic, Ziff Davis and New York Times Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (VALU) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SCHL Scholastic Corp
$36.86 -0.4% 1M +30.0% 1Y
Market cap
$705.16M
P/E
12.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.57B
Div. yield
0.03%
Publishing Communication Services
1 win
ZD Ziff Davis, Inc.
$54.28 -0.9% 1M +62.6% 1Y
Market cap
$1.85B
P/E
2.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.32B
Div. yield
–
Publishing Communication Services
7 wins
NYT New York Times Co
$65.57 +2.3% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$10.94B
P/E
26.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.05B
Div. yield
0.01%
Publishing Communication Services
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ziff Davis leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ziff Davis 7, New York Times 4, Scholastic 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSCHLZDNYTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $705.16M $1.85B $10.94B NYT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.5x 2.9x 26.8x ZD
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 27.7x 10.0x 24.2x ZD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -2.5% -0.7% +10.8% NYT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.6% 48.6% 13.4% ZD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.2% 2.6% — ZD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x -2.6x — ZD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.01% SCHL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +30.0% +62.6% +13.8% ZD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.3%/yr -15.7%/yr +5.5%/yr NYT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.6% 55.8% 32.1% NYT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 88/100 78/100 ZD

Percentile Scorecard

SCHLZDNYT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSCHLZDNYT
Valuation 58 #23 of 53 94 #4 of 53 31 #37 of 53
Growth 33 #30 of 44 88 #6 of 44 93 #4 of 44
Profitability 50 #22 of 43 71 #13 of 43 98 #2 of 43
Financial Health 67 #21 of 61 87 #9 of 61 90 #7 of 61
Shareholder Returns 57 #13 of 29 100 #1 of 29 79 #7 of 29
Overall 53 88 78
  • SCHL ranked among 62 companies in Advertising and Media
  • ZD ranked among 62 companies in Advertising and Media
  • NYT ranked among 62 companies in Advertising and Media

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSCHLZDNYTSPY
1 month -0.4%-0.9%+2.3% -5.9%
3 months -7.6%+6.5%+1.2% -4.6%
6 months -7.8%+25.3%-18.2% +0.2%
Year to date +24.4%+54.4%-5.5% +7.5%
1 year +30.0%+62.6%+13.8% +8.2%
3 years -6.4%-11.5%+58.3% +68.3%
3 years, per year -2.2%-4.0%+16.5% +19.0%
5 years -6.2%-57.3%+30.8% +56.5%
5 years, per year -1.3%-15.7%+5.5% +9.4%
10 years -3.3%-8.1%+498.8% +251.5%
10 years, per year -0.3%-0.8%+19.6% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureSCHLZDNYTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.6%55.8%32.1% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.1%40.5%38.3% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.370.690.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.841.120.43 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.7%-80.1%-43.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -22.1%-8.2%-23.6% -5.9%
52-week high $47.34$59.13$85.86 $779.14
52-week low $27.00$26.51$57.61 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSCHLZDNYT
P/E now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 14.0x 3.1xmedian 14.0x 25.9xmedian 14.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.5x 1.4xmedian 0.5x 3.4xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 9.6x 4.1xmedian 9.6x 16.9xmedian 9.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median -45.1xmedian 8.0x 6.0xmedian 8.0x 17.6xmedian 8.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.6x 0.8xmedian 1.6x 5.1xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.68median 0.40 0.03median 0.40 0.89median 0.40

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSCHLZDNYT
Revenue $1.57B $1.32B $3.05B
Gross profit $888.70M $1.12B $1.57B
Operating income $15.20M $72.68M $492.16M
Net income $56.60M $643.49M $408.53M
Free cash flow -$14.40M $316.73M $593.43M
R&D – $57.65M $279.70M
EPS (diluted) $2.99 $17.69 $2.52
Cash & equivalents $106.80M $1.61B $221.35M
Total debt $184.80M $867.64M –
Shares (diluted) 18.90M 36.38M 162.25M
Enterprise value $259.56M -$1.36B $8.37B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSCHLZDNYT
P/E 12.3x 3.1x 25.9x
P/FCF -45.1x 6.0x 17.6x
P/Operating cash flow 17.0x 4.2x 16.7x
P/S 0.4x 1.4x 3.4x
P/B 1.0x 0.8x 5.1x
P/Tangible book 1.1x 1.0x 5.7x
EV/EBITDA 7.4x 4.1x 16.9x
EV/EBIT 47.8x 16.0x 19.8x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 0.9x 3.2x
EV/FCF -50.5x 3.7x 16.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.1x 2.6x 15.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.68 0.03 0.89

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSCHLZDNYT
Revenue growth (1Y) -2.5% -0.7% 10.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.0% -1.2% 8.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -1.2% -2.1% 13.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.3% -1.8% 10.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 25.6% -6.2% 18.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -38.5% -27.1% 27.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 639.0% 873.6% 20.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -0.6% 89.4% 28.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 818.7% 1,055% 22.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 18.0% 106.0% 29.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -54.8% 31.1% 9.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -39.4% 14.5% 29.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -134.2% 35.9% 10.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -28.8% 18.3% 31.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSCHLZDNYT
Gross margin 56.5% 84.9% 51.7%
EBITDA margin 6.2% 21.5% 18.9%
Operating margin 1.0% 5.5% 16.2%
Pretax margin 5.6% -1.9% 17.1%
Net margin 3.6% 48.6% 13.4%
FCF margin -0.9% 23.9% 19.5%
Operating cash flow margin 2.4% 33.8% 20.6%
Return on equity 8.0% 33.5% 20.0%
Return on assets 3.3% 17.9% 13.6%
Return on invested capital 1.2% 2.6% –
Return on capital employed 1.3% 2.7% 21.3%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.4x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 0.7x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 3.6% 2.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSCHLZDNYT
Debt / assets 10.7% 21.7% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x -2.6x –
Debt / FCF -12.8x 2.7x –
Liabilities / assets 61.9% 44.0% 32.2%
Equity / assets 38.1% 56.0% 67.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.3x 2.2x 1.5x
Quick ratio 0.5x 2.1x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.2x 1.7x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 2.19 2.03 9.40

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSCHLZDNYT
Dividend yield 2.4% – 1.3%
Net buyback yield 40.9% 14.5% 2.2%
Shareholder yield 43.4% 14.5% 3.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) 32.9% – 32.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) -129.2% – 22.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) -15.8% – 30.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -11.7% – 26.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSCHLZDNYT
Forward P/E 27.7xFY2026 10.0xFY2026 24.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.33FY2026 $5.44FY2026 $2.71FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -28.9%FY2026 -17.9%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +78.2% +4.0% +18.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.66BFY2026 $1.15BFY2026 $3.24BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.1%FY2026 -20.6%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.8% +0.6% +6.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSCHLZDNYT
Held by institutions 73.2% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 226 268 633
Change in shares held, QoQ -8.2% -2.6% +2.3%
Institutions buying 109 117 314
Institutions selling 89 106 224
Buyers to sellers 1.22 1.10 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SCHLZDNYT
SCHL 1.00 0.16 0.07
ZD 0.16 1.00 0.10
NYT 0.07 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SCHL, ZD and NYT?

New York Times (NYT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Scholastic (SCHL) $705.16M, Ziff Davis (ZD) $1.85B, New York Times (NYT) $10.94B.

Which stock is cheaper, SCHL, ZD and NYT?

Ziff Davis (ZD) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Scholastic (SCHL) 12.5x, Ziff Davis (ZD) 2.9x, New York Times (NYT) 26.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ziff Davis (ZD) is cheapest (Scholastic (SCHL) 27.7x, Ziff Davis (ZD) 10.0x, New York Times (NYT) 24.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

New York Times (NYT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Scholastic (SCHL) -2.5%, Ziff Davis (ZD) -0.7%, New York Times (NYT) +10.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ziff Davis (ZD) has the highest net margin (Scholastic (SCHL) 3.6%, Ziff Davis (ZD) 48.6%, New York Times (NYT) 13.4%). On return on invested capital, Ziff Davis (ZD) leads (Scholastic (SCHL) 1.2%, Ziff Davis (ZD) 2.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ziff Davis (ZD) returned the most: Scholastic (SCHL) +30.0%, Ziff Davis (ZD) +62.6%, New York Times (NYT) +13.8%. Over five years, New York Times (NYT) compounded fastest (Scholastic (SCHL) -1.3%/yr, Ziff Davis (ZD) -15.7%/yr, New York Times (NYT) +5.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Scholastic (SCHL) has the highest dividend yield: Scholastic (SCHL) 0.03%, Ziff Davis (ZD) 0.00%, New York Times (NYT) 0.01%. Ziff Davis (ZD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, New York Times (NYT) has been the steadiest (Scholastic (SCHL) 35.6%, Ziff Davis (ZD) 55.8%, New York Times (NYT) 32.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, SCHL, ZD and NYT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ziff Davis (ZD) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.