SANG vs ZM Stock Comparison

Sangoma Technologies and Zoom Communications Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ZM Zoom Communications, Inc.
$98.04 +9.3% 1M +16.3% 1Y
Market cap
$28.53B
P/E
8.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.97B
Div. yield
–
Communications Platforms Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Zoom Communications leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Zoom Communications 7). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionSANGZMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $151.26M $28.53B ZM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.9x 8.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.2x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -14.2% +4.6% ZM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -39.0% 64.1% ZM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 54.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -11.3% +16.3% ZM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.5%/yr -18.5%/yr ZM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.2% 44.8% ZM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 80/100 ZM

Percentile Scorecard

SANGZM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisSANGZM
Valuation 93 #3 of 29 71 #9 of 29
Growth 0 #27 of 27 69 #9 of 27
Profitability 48 #14 of 26 84 #5 of 26
Financial Health 50 #16 of 31 97 #2 of 31
Shareholder Returns 19 #14 of 17 –
Overall 42 80
  • SANG ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software
  • ZM ranked among 32 companies in Workplace Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodSANGZMSPY
1 month +31.0%+9.3% -0.8%
3 months +11.8%+7.5% +3.5%
6 months +7.1%+7.9% +7.0%
Year to date -8.3%+13.6% +12.2%
1 year -11.3%+16.3% +13.0%
3 years +63.2%+65.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +17.7%+18.3% +23.1%
5 years -78.5%-64.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -26.5%-18.5% +11.0%
10 years +121.4%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +8.3%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureSANGZMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.2%44.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.4%42.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.201.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.220.36 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -89.2%-80.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.9%-12.4% -1.8%
52-week high $5.40$111.88 $779.14
52-week low $3.42$72.72 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleSANGZM
P/E now vs peer median -2.0xmedian 31.9x 9.0xmedian 31.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 2.4x 5.8xmedian 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 11.5x 13.9xmedian 11.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 14.2x 14.2xmedian 14.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 3.0x 2.5xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.05median 0.77 0.05median 0.77

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsSANGZM
Revenue $203.08M $4.97B
Gross profit $143.68M $3.84B
Operating income $66.76M $1.20B
Net income -$81.09M $3.19B
Free cash flow $21.92M –
R&D $42.90M $881.96M
EPS (diluted) $-2.38 $10.64
Cash & equivalents $10.43M $931.99M
Total debt $89.10M –
Shares (diluted) 33.24M 299.75M
Enterprise value $92.77M -$2.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricSANGZM
P/E -2.0x 9.0x
P/FCF 7.1x 14.2x
P/Operating cash flow 6.5x –
P/S 0.8x 5.8x
P/B 0.9x 2.5x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA 1.7x 13.9x
EV/EBIT 2.6x 17.9x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 4.3x
EV/FCF 7.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 7.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.05 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricSANGZM
Revenue growth (1Y) -14.2% 4.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -7.0% 3.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -11.2% 5.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -6.0% 4.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -18.1% 23.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -18.7% 112.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,519% 168.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -40.8% 182.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,493% 175.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -39.6% 184.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -43.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -9.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -50.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricSANGZM
Gross margin 70.7% 77.2%
EBITDA margin 50.3% 30.9%
Operating margin 32.9% 24.1%
Pretax margin -41.7% 82.5%
Net margin -39.0% 64.1%
FCF margin 10.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 11.7% –
Return on equity -87.1% 30.2%
Return on assets – 25.0%
Return on invested capital 54.0% –
Return on capital employed – 11.2%
Asset turnover – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricSANGZM
Debt / assets 11.6% –
Debt / equity 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x –
Debt / FCF 1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 25.8% 16.8%
Equity / assets 74.2% 83.2%
Interest coverage 33.0x –
Current ratio 0.8x 3.8x
Quick ratio 0.5x 3.7x
Cash ratio 0.2x 3.4x
Altman Z-score 1.92 9.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricSANGZM
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield -0.1% –
Shareholder yield -0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusSANGZM
Forward P/E – 15.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.17FY2027 $6.45FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +9.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +2.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $192.47MFY2027 $4.76BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.8%FY2027 -2.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.5% +8.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersSANGZM
Held by institutions – 67.2%
Institutions holding – 862
Change in shares held, QoQ – +2.9%
Institutions buying – 477
Institutions selling – 279
Buyers to sellers – 1.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

SANGZM
SANG 1.00 0.12
ZM 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, SANG and ZM?

Zoom Communications (ZM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Sangoma Technologies (SANG) $151.26M, Zoom Communications (ZM) $28.53B.

Which company is growing faster?

Zoom Communications (ZM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -14.2%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zoom Communications (ZM) has the highest net margin (Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -39.0%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 64.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zoom Communications (ZM) returned the most: Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -11.3%, Zoom Communications (ZM) +16.3%. Over five years, Zoom Communications (ZM) compounded fastest (Sangoma Technologies (SANG) -26.5%/yr, Zoom Communications (ZM) -18.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zoom Communications (ZM) has been the steadiest (Sangoma Technologies (SANG) 51.2%, Zoom Communications (ZM) 44.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do SANG and ZM move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.12, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, SANG and ZM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zoom Communications (ZM) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.