RTNTF vs TX vs SIM Stock Comparison

Rio Tinto, Ternium and GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CLF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RTNTF Rio Tinto Ltd
$101.00 -11.9% 1M +18.8% 1Y
Market cap
$161.67B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Iron Ore Basic Materials
2 wins
TX Ternium S.A.
$54.00 -2.5% 1M +49.4% 1Y
Market cap
$10.82B
P/E
15.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.00B
Div. yield
–
Steel Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Ternium leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ternium 4, Rio Tinto 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRTNTFTXSIMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $161.67B $10.82B $3.97B RTNTF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 15.5x 50.9x TX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.2x 8.7x 18.1x TX
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -1.4% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 4.4% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 6.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.0x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.8% +49.4% -6.9% TX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.6%/yr +4.1%/yr -0.5%/yr RTNTF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.3% 32.3% 44.0% TX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 64/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

RTNTFTXSIM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRTNTFTXSIM
Valuation – 99 #2 of 162 71 #48 of 162
Growth – 33 #99 of 147 –
Profitability – 56 #54 of 122 –
Financial Health 27 #121 of 165 43 #94 of 165 80 #34 of 165
Shareholder Returns – 90 #12 of 107 –
Overall – 64 –
  • RTNTF ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • TX ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SIM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRTNTFTXSIMSPY
1 month -11.9%-2.5%-10.4% -0.8%
3 months -5.9%+13.1%-2.8% +3.5%
6 months -20.2%+25.6%-15.8% +7.0%
Year to date +2.1%+41.4%-12.8% +12.2%
1 year +18.8%+49.4%-6.9% +13.0%
3 years +38.0%+43.3%-15.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +11.3%+12.8%-5.6% +23.1%
5 years +44.3%+22.0%-2.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year +7.6%+4.1%-0.5% +11.0%
10 years +159.9%+125.0%+145.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +10.0%+8.4%+9.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureRTNTFTXSIMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.3%32.3%44.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 66.0%31.3%85.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.881.020.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.421.53-0.16 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -41.4%-50.4%-40.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.3%-9.5%-24.7% -1.8%
52-week high $133.44$59.66$34.35 $779.14
52-week low $81.39$35.26$25.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRTNTFTXSIM
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.8x 15.2xmedian 12.8x 50.9xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.1x 0.7xmedian 3.1x 2.7xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.0x 4.4xmedian 7.0x —median 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 15.2x 3.5xmedian 15.2x -34.7xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 2.1x 0.9xmedian 2.1x 1.3xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.29 —median 0.29 —median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRTNTFTXSIM
Revenue – $16.00B –
Gross profit – $2.84B –
Operating income – $1.19B –
Net income – $738.00M –
Free cash flow – $3.08B –
Cash & equivalents $8.91B $9.87B $1.59B
Total debt $78.67B $29.07B $67.31M
Shares (diluted) 1.64B – –
Enterprise value $124.47B -$20.31B -$5.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRTNTFTXSIM
P/E – 15.2x 50.9x
P/FCF – 3.5x -34.7x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.0x –
P/S – 0.7x 2.7x
P/B 2.3x 0.9x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 2.5x 0.9x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA – 4.4x –
EV/EBIT – 7.4x –
EV/Revenue – 0.5x –
EV/FCF – 2.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 5.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRTNTFTXSIM
Revenue growth (1Y) – -1.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 1.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 30.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -0.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 117.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -13.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) – -10.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -21.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) – – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -24.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -18.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -18.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRTNTFTXSIM
Gross margin – 17.7% –
EBITDA margin – 12.3% –
Operating margin – 7.5% –
Pretax margin – 6.8% –
Net margin – 4.4% –
FCF margin – 19.3% –
Operating cash flow margin – 9.6% –
Return on equity – 6.0% –
Return on assets – 3.0% –
Return on invested capital – 6.0% –
Return on capital employed – 5.8% –
Asset turnover – 0.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.1x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRTNTFTXSIM
Debt / assets 16.3% 31.8% 1.7%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.6x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.0x –
Debt / FCF – 2.5x –
Liabilities / assets 46.3% 49.9% 16.9%
Equity / assets 53.7% 50.1% 83.1%
Interest coverage – 5.9x –
Current ratio 1.4x 2.6x 5.3x
Quick ratio 0.9x 6.4x 4.0x
Cash ratio 0.6x 2.6x 3.4x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRTNTFTXSIM
Dividend yield – 4.1% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 4.1% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRTNTFTXSIM
Forward P/E 12.2xFY2026 8.7xFY2026 18.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.30FY2026 $6.24FY2026 $1.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +24.1%FY2026 +183.6%FY2026 +181.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.6% +32.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $66.01BFY2026 $18.45BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +14.5%FY2026 +18.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -4.1% +5.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRTNTFTXSIM
Held by institutions – 14.2% 0.1%
Institutions holding – 163 12
Change in shares held, QoQ – +17.2% -0.3%
Institutions buying – 107 1
Institutions selling – 35 3
Buyers to sellers – 3.06 0.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RTNTFTXSIM
RTNTF 1.00 0.24 0.16
TX 0.24 1.00 0.17
SIM 0.16 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RTNTF, TX and SIM?

Rio Tinto (RTNTF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rio Tinto (RTNTF) $161.67B, Ternium (TX) $10.82B, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) $3.97B.

Which stock is cheaper, RTNTF, TX and SIM?

Ternium (TX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ternium (TX) 15.5x, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) 50.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ternium (TX) is cheapest (Rio Tinto (RTNTF) 12.2x, Ternium (TX) 8.7x, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) 18.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ternium (TX) returned the most: Rio Tinto (RTNTF) +18.8%, Ternium (TX) +49.4%, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) -6.9%. Over five years, Rio Tinto (RTNTF) compounded fastest (Rio Tinto (RTNTF) +7.6%/yr, Ternium (TX) +4.1%/yr, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) -0.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ternium (TX) has been the steadiest (Rio Tinto (RTNTF) 45.3%, Ternium (TX) 32.3%, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) 44.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RTNTF, TX and SIM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ternium (TX) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.