RSKIA vs SNT vs SPCB Stock Comparison

George Risk Industries, Senstar Technologies and SuperCom Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BCO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SPCB SuperCom Ltd
$10.29 +12.1% 1M -9.7% 1Y
Market cap
$45.30M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

George Risk Industries leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (George Risk Industries 8). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRSKIASNTSPCBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $101.44M $38.26M $45.30M RSKIA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.4x 77.8x — RSKIA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 7.1x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.9% -3.2% — RSKIA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 37.9% 1.3% — RSKIA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 0.7% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 6.02% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.3% -65.8% -9.7% RSKIA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.3%/yr -16.8%/yr -43.6%/yr RSKIA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 24.9% 59.3% 62.4% RSKIA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 87/100 49/100 — RSKIA

Percentile Scorecard

RSKIASNTSPCB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRSKIASNTSPCB
Valuation 78 #26 of 113 71 #34 of 113 –
Growth 88 #12 of 96 2 #94 of 96 –
Profitability 87 #13 of 91 33 #61 of 91 –
Financial Health 98 #3 of 122 89 #14 of 122 60 #52 of 127
Shareholder Returns 85 #11 of 66 – –
Overall 87 49 –
  • RSKIA ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • SNT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • SPCB ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRSKIASNTSPCBSPY
1 month -4.6%+1.9%+12.1% +0.7%
3 months +10.3%-6.3%-3.7% +3.7%
6 months +11.6%-40.7%+4.9% +7.1%
Year to date +20.3%-66.3%+13.7% +12.8%
1 year +27.3%-65.8%-9.7% +11.9%
3 years +76.6%+32.5%+0.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +20.9%+9.8%+0.3% +22.8%
5 years +55.9%-60.1%-94.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +9.3%-16.8%-43.6% +10.9%
10 years +184.2%-63.7%-98.1% +262.0%
10 years, per year +11.0%-9.6%-32.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRSKIASNTSPCBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 24.9%59.3%62.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.0%60.8%59.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.020.911.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.10-1.11-0.16 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -39.0%-74.7%-98.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.8%-66.8%-16.7% -1.2%
52-week high $22.75$4.91$12.36 $779.14
52-week low $16.30$1.34$7.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRSKIASNTSPCB
P/E now vs peer median 10.4xmedian 21.9x 77.3xmedian 21.9x —median 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 0.9x 1.0xmedian 0.9x —median 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.8xmedian 11.9x —median 11.9x —median 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.0xmedian 14.4x —median 14.4x —median 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.4x 0.9xmedian 2.4x 1.2xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.59median 0.97 —median 0.97 —median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRSKIASNTSPCB
Revenue $25.81M $36.80M –
Gross profit $12.15M $23.34M –
Operating income $7.06M $729.00K –
Net income $9.79M $378.00K –
Free cash flow $4.22M – –
R&D – $3.98M –
EPS (diluted) $1.99 $0.02 –
Cash & equivalents $6.84M $7.88M $7.43M
Total debt – $1.14M $88.25M
Shares (diluted) 4.91M 23.46M 4.96M
Enterprise value -$86.85M -$24.46M -$6.49M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRSKIASNTSPCB
P/E 10.4x 77.3x –
P/FCF 24.0x – –
P/Operating cash flow 22.7x – –
P/S 3.9x 1.0x –
P/B 1.6x 0.9x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 0.9x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA 6.8x – –
EV/EBIT 7.2x 41.8x –
EV/Revenue 2.0x 0.8x –
EV/FCF 12.1x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 11.4x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.59 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRSKIASNTSPCB
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.9% -3.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.8% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.6% -7.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.6% -86.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.9% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 19.1% -92.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 17.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 19.2% -90.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 17.5% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 7.8% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 29.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.2% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.3% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRSKIASNTSPCB
Gross margin 47.1% 63.4% –
EBITDA margin 29.0% – –
Operating margin 27.4% 2.0% –
Pretax margin 50.9% 2.4% –
Net margin 37.9% 1.3% –
FCF margin 16.4% – –
Operating cash flow margin 17.3% – –
Return on equity 15.2% 0.9% –
Return on assets 13.4% 0.7% –
Return on invested capital – 0.7% –
Return on capital employed 10.4% 1.6% –
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.7x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRSKIASNTSPCB
Debt / assets – 0.8% 26.5%
Debt / equity – 0.0x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 11.9% 20.6% 37.2%
Equity / assets 88.1% 79.4% 62.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 14.6x 3.6x 5.7x
Quick ratio 11.2x 2.2x 3.9x
Cash ratio 10.3x 1.0x 1.2x
Altman Z-score 9.94 3.21 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRSKIASNTSPCB
Dividend yield 6.0% – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 6.0% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRSKIASNTSPCB
Forward P/E – – 7.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – – $1.44FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -41.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -26.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – – $29.73MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – – +6.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – – +11.0%

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RSKIASNTSPCB
RSKIA 1.00 0.03 -0.02
SNT 0.03 1.00 -0.02
SPCB -0.02 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RSKIA, SNT and SPCB?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) is the largest by market capitalisation: George Risk Industries (RSKIA) $101.44M, Senstar Technologies (SNT) $38.26M, SuperCom (SPCB) $45.30M.

Which stock is cheaper, RSKIA, SNT and SPCB?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 10.4x, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 77.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +13.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -3.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

George Risk Industries (RSKIA) has the highest net margin (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 37.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 1.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year George Risk Industries (RSKIA) returned the most: George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +27.3%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -65.8%, SuperCom (SPCB) -9.7%. Over five years, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) compounded fastest (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +9.3%/yr, Senstar Technologies (SNT) -16.8%/yr, SuperCom (SPCB) -43.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 6.02%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 0.00%, SuperCom (SPCB) 0.00%. Senstar Technologies (SNT) and SuperCom (SPCB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) has been the steadiest (George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 24.9%, Senstar Technologies (SNT) 59.3%, SuperCom (SPCB) 62.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RSKIA, SNT and SPCB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.