RPT vs SKYH vs CXW Stock Comparison

Rithm Property Trust, Sky Harbour and CoreCivic Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BEEP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SKYH Sky Harbour Group Corp
$10.28 +9.9% 1M +5.2% 1Y
Market cap
$338.37M
P/E
365.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$33.94M
Div. yield
–
Specialty REITs Real Estate
2 wins
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.
$30.54 -9.5% 1M +65.7% 1Y
Market cap
$2.87B
P/E
22.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.48B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

CoreCivic leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (CoreCivic 4, Rithm Property Trust 4, Sky Harbour 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRPTSKYHCXWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $89.20M $338.37M $2.87B CXW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 73.8x 365.4x 22.5x CXW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 1.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +137.6% +62.2% +24.3% RPT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.2% 2.7% 5.1% RPT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.5% — 6.6% RPT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -8.6x 3.2x SKYH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -22.8% +5.2% +65.7% CXW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -33.8%/yr +0.3%/yr +26.1%/yr CXW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.9% 35.9% 41.9% SKYH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 24/100 54/100 RPT

Percentile Scorecard

RPTSKYHCXW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRPTSKYHCXW
Valuation 41 #87 of 146 0 #146 of 146 49 #59 of 114
Growth 95 #8 of 145 90 #16 of 145 47 #52 of 98
Profitability 23 #109 of 141 2 #138 of 141 52 #46 of 95
Financial Health 55 #66 of 146 16 #123 of 146 39 #77 of 126
Shareholder Returns 95 #8 of 136 13 #119 of 136 84 #12 of 70
Overall 62 24 54
  • RPT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SKYH ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • CXW ranked among 131 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRPTSKYHCXWSPY
1 month +1.8%+9.9%-9.5% -1.0%
3 months -9.8%-6.9%-2.2% -0.4%
6 months -24.3%+1.0%+44.3% +4.5%
Year to date -32.6%+14.6%+59.8% +12.4%
1 year -22.8%+5.2%+65.7% +13.6%
3 years -58.3%+53.9%+129.6% +76.4%
3 years, per year -25.3%+15.5%+32.0% +20.8%
5 years -87.3%+1.5%+219.1% +63.7%
5 years, per year -33.8%+0.3%+26.1% +10.4%
10 years -85.7%—+109.8% +267.7%
10 years, per year -17.7%—+7.7% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureRPTSKYHCXWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.9%35.9%41.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.4%36.1%43.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.420.980.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.600.151.57 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.2%-92.9%-39.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.5%-10.3%-14.0% -1.6%
52-week high $17.88$11.46$35.53 $779.14
52-week low $10.41$8.30$16.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRPTSKYHCXW
P/E now vs peer median 72.6xmedian 26.6x 382.5xmedian 26.6x 23.6xmedian 23.0x
P/S now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 4.3x 23.2xmedian 4.3x 1.2xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.7x -53.0xmedian 14.7x 11.0xmedian 12.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.9xmedian 22.1x -143.4xmedian 22.1x 52.7xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.3x 4.8xmedian 1.3x 2.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.75median 2.01 13.65median 2.01 3.33median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRPTSKYHCXW
Revenue $19.55M $33.94M $2.48B
Operating income – -$27.42M –
Net income $6.37M -$11.25M $127.90M
Free cash flow -$12.80M -$5.49M $57.32M
EPS (diluted) $0.15 $0.03 $1.29
Cash & equivalents $45.25M $164.03M $108.93M
Total debt $109.15M $316.34M $1.35B
Shares (diluted) 7.86M 34.46M 98.89M
Enterprise value -$766.84M $19.76M $2.40B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRPTSKYHCXW
P/E 72.6x 382.5x 23.6x
P/FCF -6.9x -143.4x 52.7x
P/Operating cash flow -6.9x 3,498x 15.1x
P/S 4.5x 23.2x 1.2x
P/B 0.3x 4.8x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 4.9x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA – -53.0x 11.0x
EV/EBIT 2.2x -34.3x 17.2x
EV/Revenue 4.8x 27.7x 1.7x
EV/FCF -7.3x -171.1x 74.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -7.3x 4,175x 21.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.75 13.65 3.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRPTSKYHCXW
Revenue growth (1Y) 137.6% 62.2% 24.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 53.7% 106.1% 10.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -11.5% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -17.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) 58,009% 64.2% 22.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 30.2% 8.8% 2.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 165.5% 110.0% 35.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.4% 28.0% 7.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -29.4% 102.3% -26.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.0% 26.5% 2.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -29.4% 68.5% -66.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.0% 17.3% -19.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRPTSKYHCXW
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – -52.2% 15.6%
Operating margin – -80.8% –
Pretax margin 32.1% -91.7% 7.0%
Net margin 6.2% 2.7% 5.1%
FCF margin -65.5% -16.2% 2.3%
Operating cash flow margin -65.5% 0.7% 8.1%
Return on equity 2.2% -6.8% 9.0%
Return on assets 0.7% -1.4% 3.7%
Return on invested capital 10.5% – 6.6%
Return on capital employed – – 8.5%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.0x 0.0x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 19.5% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRPTSKYHCXW
Debt / assets 11.3% 38.4% 39.0%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.9x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – -8.6x 3.2x
Debt / FCF -8.5x -57.6x 23.5x
Liabilities / assets 70.2% 80.1% 58.4%
Equity / assets 29.8% 19.9% 41.6%
Interest coverage 1.2x -7.4x 3.3x
Current ratio – – 1.3x
Quick ratio – – 1.1x
Cash ratio – – 0.2x
Altman Z-score – – 1.89

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRPTSKYHCXW
Dividend yield 16.1% – –
Net buyback yield 0.3% -0.3% 6.3%
Shareholder yield 16.4% -0.3% 6.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRPTSKYHCXW
Forward P/E – – 1.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.06FY2026 $-0.40FY2026 $16.94FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -544.4%FY2026 +1,468.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -85.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.82MFY2026 $42.16MFY2026 $2.85BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +64.5%FY2026 +53.1%FY2026 +29.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.4% +57.5% -0.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRPTSKYHCXW
Held by institutions 63.8% 15.4% 87.5%
Institutions holding 52 90 278
Change in shares held, QoQ -9.0% +15.7% +0.2%
Institutions buying 24 55 155
Institutions selling 21 18 86
Buyers to sellers 1.14 3.06 1.80

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RPTSKYHCXW
RPT 1.00 0.11 0.06
SKYH 0.11 1.00 0.19
CXW 0.06 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RPT, SKYH and CXW?

CoreCivic (CXW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rithm Property Trust (RPT) $89.20M, Sky Harbour (SKYH) $338.37M, CoreCivic (CXW) $2.87B.

Which stock is cheaper, RPT, SKYH and CXW?

CoreCivic (CXW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 73.8x, Sky Harbour (SKYH) 365.4x, CoreCivic (CXW) 22.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rithm Property Trust (RPT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rithm Property Trust (RPT) +137.6%, Sky Harbour (SKYH) +62.2%, CoreCivic (CXW) +24.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rithm Property Trust (RPT) has the highest net margin (Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 6.2%, Sky Harbour (SKYH) 2.7%, CoreCivic (CXW) 5.1%). On return on invested capital, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) leads (Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 10.5%, CoreCivic (CXW) 6.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CoreCivic (CXW) returned the most: Rithm Property Trust (RPT) -22.8%, Sky Harbour (SKYH) +5.2%, CoreCivic (CXW) +65.7%. Over five years, CoreCivic (CXW) compounded fastest (Rithm Property Trust (RPT) -33.8%/yr, Sky Harbour (SKYH) +0.3%/yr, CoreCivic (CXW) +26.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sky Harbour (SKYH) has been the steadiest (Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 37.9%, Sky Harbour (SKYH) 35.9%, CoreCivic (CXW) 41.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RPT, SKYH and CXW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CoreCivic (CXW) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.