RPT vs GEO vs CXW Stock Comparison

Rithm Property Trust, Geo and CoreCivic Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FRPH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RPT Rithm Property Trust Inc.
$11.05 +1.8% 1M -24.5% 1Y
Market cap
$87.40M
P/E
71.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.55M
Div. yield
16.29%
Specialty REITs Real Estate
2 wins
GEO Geo Group Inc
$25.14 -16.0% 1M +49.6% 1Y
Market cap
$3.33B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.83B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
1 win
CXW CoreCivic, Inc.
$28.38 -10.7% 1M +52.3% 1Y
Market cap
$2.45B
P/E
1.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.65B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
8 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

CoreCivic leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (CoreCivic 8, Rithm Property Trust 2, Geo 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRPTGEOCXWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $87.40M $3.33B $2.45B GEO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 71.8x 11.3x 1.8x CXW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 184.2x 18.2x 1.7x CXW
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +137.6% +15.3% +26.9% RPT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.2% 10.3% 54.6% CXW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.5% 7.5% 52.5% CXW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.3x 0.0x CXW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 16.29% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -24.5% +49.6% +52.3% CXW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -34.0%/yr +21.3%/yr +24.3%/yr CXW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.9% 50.0% 42.6% RPT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 57/100 78/100 CXW

Percentile Scorecard

RPTGEOCXW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRPTGEOCXW
Valuation 43 #84 of 146 56 #51 of 114 62 #44 of 114
Growth 94 #10 of 145 58 #42 of 98 67 #33 of 98
Profitability 22 #110 of 141 59 #40 of 95 77 #23 of 95
Financial Health 55 #67 of 146 34 #83 of 126 84 #21 of 126
Shareholder Returns 95 #8 of 136 77 #17 of 71 100 #1 of 71
Overall 62 57 78
  • RPT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • GEO ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • CXW ranked among 131 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRPTGEOCXWSPY
1 month +1.8%-16.0%-10.7% -5.9%
3 months -8.9%-16.6%-12.0% -4.6%
6 months -26.9%+18.5%+30.1% +0.2%
Year to date -33.4%+56.0%+48.5% +7.5%
1 year -24.5%+49.6%+52.3% +8.2%
3 years -59.4%+180.9%+111.5% +68.3%
3 years, per year -26.0%+41.1%+28.4% +19.0%
5 years -87.4%+163.0%+196.6% +56.5%
5 years, per year -34.0%+21.3%+24.3% +9.4%
10 years -85.8%+59.9%+94.9% +251.5%
10 years, per year -17.8%+4.8%+6.9% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureRPTGEOCXWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.9%50.0%42.6% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%52.4%44.7% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.390.900.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.650.991.23 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.1%-62.5%-39.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.2%-23.3%-20.1% -5.9%
52-week high $17.88$32.78$35.53 $779.14
52-week low $10.41$13.26$16.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRPTGEOCXW
P/E now vs peer median 71.8xmedian 26.5x 11.3xmedian 21.1x 1.8xmedian 21.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 4.2x 1.2xmedian 0.9x 0.9xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.4x 10.5xmedian 11.7x 1.2xmedian 11.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.8xmedian 21.7x 125.8xmedian 15.3x -6.2xmedian 15.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.3x 2.2xmedian 2.3x 1.1xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.72median 1.78 0.44median 0.88 0.01median 0.88

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRPTGEOCXW
Revenue $19.55M $2.83B $2.65B
Operating income – $315.54M –
Net income $6.37M $291.54M $1.45B
Free cash flow -$12.80M $26.44M -$397.73M
EPS (diluted) $0.15 $2.21 $15.73
Cash & equivalents $45.25M $54.99M $547.23M
Total debt $109.15M $1.54B $623.11M
Shares (diluted) 7.86M 132.02M 91.94M
Enterprise value -$769.10M $2.94B $1.49B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRPTGEOCXW
P/E 71.8x 11.3x 1.8x
P/FCF -6.8x 125.8x -6.2x
P/Operating cash flow -6.8x 16.7x -9.2x
P/S 4.5x 1.2x 0.9x
P/B 0.3x 2.2x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 0.3x 2.4x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA – 10.5x 1.2x
EV/EBIT 2.2x 15.3x 1.2x
EV/Revenue 4.7x 1.7x 1.0x
EV/FCF -7.2x 182.1x -6.4x
EV/Operating cash flow -7.2x 24.2x -9.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.72 0.44 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRPTGEOCXW
Revenue growth (1Y) 137.6% 15.3% 26.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 53.7% 5.0% 12.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 11.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -7.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 58,009% 222.2% 1,223%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 30.2% 28.5% 180.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 165.5% 242.8% 1,438%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.4% 25.6% 201.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -29.4% -16.6% -214.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.0% -4.1% -45.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -29.4% -79.8% -452.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.0% -42.6% -63.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRPTGEOCXW
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 16.1% 82.7%
Operating margin – 11.2% –
Pretax margin 32.1% 14.0% 75.0%
Net margin 6.2% 10.3% 54.6%
FCF margin -65.5% 0.9% -15.0%
Operating cash flow margin -65.5% 7.0% -10.1%
Return on equity 2.2% 19.4% 77.8%
Return on assets 0.7% 7.7% 40.5%
Return on invested capital 10.5% 7.5% 52.5%
Return on capital employed – 9.3% 66.8%
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.0x 0.7x -0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.9% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRPTGEOCXW
Debt / assets 11.3% 41.2% 16.9%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.0x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.3x 0.0x
Debt / FCF -8.5x 58.3x -1.6x
Liabilities / assets 70.2% 59.5% 38.1%
Equity / assets 29.8% 40.5% 61.9%
Interest coverage 1.2x 2.1x 32.6x
Current ratio – 1.7x 2.4x
Quick ratio – 1.5x 2.1x
Cash ratio – 0.1x 1.1x
Altman Z-score – 2.15 4.33

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRPTGEOCXW
Dividend yield 16.3% – –
Net buyback yield 0.3% 5.2% 26.7%
Shareholder yield 16.6% 5.2% 26.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRPTGEOCXW
Forward P/E 184.2xFY2026 18.2xFY2026 1.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.06FY2026 $1.38FY2026 $16.94FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +60.5%FY2026 +1,468.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +316.7% +40.6% -85.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $28.82MFY2026 $3.17BFY2026 $2.85BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +64.5%FY2026 +20.6%FY2026 +29.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.4% -1.3% -0.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRPTGEOCXW
Held by institutions 63.8% 94.2% 87.5%
Institutions holding 52 292 278
Change in shares held, QoQ -9.0% -2.2% +0.2%
Institutions buying 24 151 155
Institutions selling 21 97 86
Buyers to sellers 1.14 1.56 1.80

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RPTGEOCXW
RPT 1.00 -0.04 0.05
GEO -0.04 1.00 0.76
CXW 0.05 0.76 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RPT, GEO and CXW?

Geo (GEO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rithm Property Trust (RPT) $87.40M, Geo (GEO) $3.33B, CoreCivic (CXW) $2.45B.

Which stock is cheaper, RPT, GEO and CXW?

CoreCivic (CXW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 71.8x, Geo (GEO) 11.3x, CoreCivic (CXW) 1.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, CoreCivic (CXW) is cheapest (Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 184.2x, Geo (GEO) 18.2x, CoreCivic (CXW) 1.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rithm Property Trust (RPT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rithm Property Trust (RPT) +137.6%, Geo (GEO) +15.3%, CoreCivic (CXW) +26.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

CoreCivic (CXW) has the highest net margin (Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 6.2%, Geo (GEO) 10.3%, CoreCivic (CXW) 54.6%). On return on invested capital, CoreCivic (CXW) leads (Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 10.5%, Geo (GEO) 7.5%, CoreCivic (CXW) 52.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CoreCivic (CXW) returned the most: Rithm Property Trust (RPT) -24.5%, Geo (GEO) +49.6%, CoreCivic (CXW) +52.3%. Over five years, CoreCivic (CXW) compounded fastest (Rithm Property Trust (RPT) -34.0%/yr, Geo (GEO) +21.3%/yr, CoreCivic (CXW) +24.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 16.29%, Geo (GEO) 0.00%, CoreCivic (CXW) 0.00%. Geo (GEO) and CoreCivic (CXW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rithm Property Trust (RPT) has been the steadiest (Rithm Property Trust (RPT) 37.9%, Geo (GEO) 50.0%, CoreCivic (CXW) 42.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RPT, GEO and CXW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CoreCivic (CXW) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.