ROP vs SAP vs KHOBF Stock Comparison

Roper Technologies, Sap Se and Kheoba Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BRSL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ROP Roper Technologies Inc
$449.65 +28.7% 1M +0.8% 1Y
Market cap
$47.02B
P/E
18.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.43B
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
3 wins
SAP Sap Se
$233.99 +11.0% 1M -9.9% 1Y
Market cap
$274.39B
P/E
28.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$45.76B
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
4 wins
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Sap Se leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Sap Se 4, Roper Technologies 3, Kheoba 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionROPSAPKHOBFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $47.02B $274.39B $20.23M SAP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.2x 28.8x — ROP
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.6x 27.5x — ROP
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.2% +13.5% — SAP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 20.8% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 35.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.4x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.8% -9.9% 0.0% ROP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.6%/yr +10.1%/yr — SAP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.2% 39.1% 0.0% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 63/100 — SAP

Percentile Scorecard

ROPSAPKHOBF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisROPSAPKHOBF
Valuation 59 #42 of 101 52 #49 of 101 –
Growth 43 #56 of 97 68 #32 of 97 –
Profitability 45 #52 of 93 90 #10 of 93 –
Financial Health 48 #57 of 108 78 #25 of 108 81 #21 of 108
Shareholder Returns 24 #48 of 63 27 #46 of 63 –
Overall 44 63 –
  • ROP ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • SAP ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • KHOBF ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodROPSAPKHOBFSPY
1 month +28.7%+11.0%0.0% +0.7%
3 months +15.5%+29.3%0.0% +3.7%
6 months +26.7%+38.1%0.0% +7.1%
Year to date +1.0%-3.7%0.0% +12.8%
1 year +0.8%-9.9%0.0% +11.9%
3 years -7.3%+75.1%— +85.2%
3 years, per year -2.5%+20.5%— +22.8%
5 years -7.8%+61.6%— +67.6%
5 years, per year -1.6%+10.1%— +10.9%
10 years +167.8%+166.2%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +10.4%+10.3%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureROPSAPKHOBFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.2%39.1%0.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.7%40.3%— 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.050.630.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.02-0.25— 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.9%-53.2%-37.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.2%-11.4%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $455.20$263.96$2.50 $779.14
52-week low $315.53$146.09$2.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleROPSAPKHOBF
P/E now vs peer median 17.4xmedian 28.0x 28.6xmedian 28.0x —median 28.0x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 2.8x 6.3xmedian 2.8x —median 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 16.9x 11.8xmedian 16.9x —median 16.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 15.9x 27.6xmedian 15.9x —median 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.3xmedian 3.2x 5.5xmedian 3.2x 122.0xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -9.82median 0.89 1.79median 0.89 —median 0.89

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsROPSAPKHOBF
Revenue $8.43B $45.76B –
Gross profit $5.88B $33.40B –
Operating income $2.37B $22.06B –
Net income $2.59B $9.47B –
Free cash flow – $10.40B –
R&D – $8.26B –
EPS (diluted) $25.75 $8.11 –
Cash & equivalents $311.00M $10.62B $318.16K
Total debt – $9.68B –
Shares (diluted) 100.60M 1.18B 8.09M
Enterprise value $47.02B $201.79B $19.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricROPSAPKHOBF
P/E 17.4x 28.6x –
P/FCF 13.2x 27.6x –
P/Operating cash flow 17.0x 25.0x –
P/S 5.3x 6.3x –
P/B 2.3x 5.5x 122.0x
P/Tangible book 4.6x 5.8x 125.8x
EV/EBITDA – 11.8x –
EV/EBIT – 12.6x –
EV/Revenue 5.3x 6.1x –
EV/FCF – 26.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 17.0x 24.1x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -9.82 1.79 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricROPSAPKHOBF
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.2% 13.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.1% 11.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 10.4% 12.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 12.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 8.9% 30.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 11.8% 52.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) 65.0% 18.5% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -4.0% 16.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 77.8% 22.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -1.8% 16.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 3.8% 43.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 20.8% 19.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 43.7% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 20.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricROPSAPKHOBF
Gross margin – 73.0% –
EBITDA margin – 51.5% –
Operating margin – 48.2% –
Pretax margin – 29.2% –
Net margin – 20.8% –
FCF margin – 22.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 31.1% 25.1% –
Return on equity – 18.5% –
Return on assets – 11.2% –
Return on invested capital – 35.6% –
Return on capital employed – 34.0% –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 1.2x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.4% 3.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricROPSAPKHOBF
Debt / assets – 11.2% –
Debt / equity – 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.4x –
Debt / FCF – 0.9x –
Liabilities / assets 44.2% 39.1% 49.8%
Equity / assets 55.8% 60.9% 50.2%
Interest coverage – 8.3x –
Current ratio 0.4x 1.2x 2.0x
Quick ratio – 0.9x 2.0x
Cash ratio – 0.9x 1.9x
Altman Z-score – 7.44 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricROPSAPKHOBF
Dividend yield 0.8% 1.3% –
Net buyback yield – -0.1% –
Shareholder yield 0.8% 1.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusROPSAPKHOBF
Forward P/E 19.6xFY2026 27.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $22.94FY2026 $8.52FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +14.7%FY2026 +16.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +12.3% +4.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.28BFY2026 $42.86BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +4.8%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +16.4% +14.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersROPSAPKHOBF
Held by institutions 100.0% 7.2% –
Institutions holding 1,076 821 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.7% -3.0% –
Institutions buying 415 460 –
Institutions selling 523 245 –
Buyers to sellers 0.79 1.88 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ROPSAPKHOBF
ROP 1.00 0.46 –
SAP 0.46 1.00 –
KHOBF – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ROP, SAP and KHOBF?

Sap Se (SAP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Roper Technologies (ROP) $47.02B, Sap Se (SAP) $274.39B, Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M.

Which stock is cheaper, ROP, SAP and KHOBF?

Roper Technologies (ROP) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Roper Technologies (ROP) 18.2x, Sap Se (SAP) 28.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Roper Technologies (ROP) is cheapest (Roper Technologies (ROP) 19.6x, Sap Se (SAP) 27.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sap Se (SAP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Roper Technologies (ROP) +9.2%, Sap Se (SAP) +13.5%.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Roper Technologies (ROP) returned the most: Roper Technologies (ROP) +0.8%, Sap Se (SAP) -9.9%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%. Over five years, Sap Se (SAP) compounded fastest (Roper Technologies (ROP) -1.6%/yr, Sap Se (SAP) +10.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (Roper Technologies (ROP) 31.2%, Sap Se (SAP) 39.1%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ROP, SAP and KHOBF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Sap Se (SAP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.