ROKU vs MSFT vs KDOZF Stock Comparison

Roku, Microsoft and Kidoz Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (UIS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ROKU Roku, Inc
$156.33 +2.8% 1M +58.5% 1Y
Market cap
$22.95B
P/E
64.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.21B
Div. yield
–
Operating Systems Technology
1 win
MSFT Microsoft Corp
$530.14 +4.2% 1M -2.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.89T
P/E
27.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$346.45B
Div. yield
0.01%
Cloud Platforms Technology
7 wins
KDOZF Kidoz Inc.
$0.11 +10.0% 1M -50.0% 1Y
Market cap
$14.44M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$19.55M
Div. yield
–
Digital Advertising Technology
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Microsoft leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Microsoft 7, Kidoz 1, Roku 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionROKUMSFTKDOZFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $22.95B $3.89T $14.44M MSFT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 64.6x 27.3x -17.9x MSFT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 55.4x 26.0x — MSFT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.5% +17.9% +31.2% KDOZF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.8% 41.2% -4.1% MSFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 26.5% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +58.5% -2.1% -50.0% ROKU
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -12.5%/yr +9.8%/yr -27.3%/yr MSFT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.0% 32.6% 94.9% MSFT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 77/100 80/100 31/100 MSFT

Percentile Scorecard

ROKUMSFTKDOZF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisROKUMSFTKDOZF
Valuation 67 #42 of 124 60 #16 of 38 32 #114 of 166
Growth 96 #5 of 113 74 #10 of 36 22 #120 of 153
Profitability 78 #25 of 109 97 #2 of 34 40 #92 of 153
Financial Health 79 #28 of 127 83 #7 of 37 –
Shareholder Returns 68 #21 of 63 84 #4 of 20 –
Overall 77 80 31
  • ROKU ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • MSFT ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • KDOZF ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodROKUMSFTKDOZFSPY
1 month +2.8%+4.2%+10.0% +0.7%
3 months +7.7%+17.5%+10.0% +3.7%
6 months +34.1%+30.0%-52.2% +7.1%
Year to date +44.1%+9.6%-63.3% +12.8%
1 year +58.5%-2.1%-50.0% +11.9%
3 years +177.4%+57.2%-21.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year +40.5%+16.3%-7.7% +22.8%
5 years -48.7%+59.9%-79.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year -12.5%+9.8%-27.3% +10.9%
10 years —+785.5%-75.6% +262.0%
10 years, per year —+24.4%-13.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureROKUMSFTKDOZFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.0%32.6%94.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 34.9%30.7%169.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.370.990.85 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.46-0.06-0.53 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.8%-37.6%-97.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.3%-2.4%-64.5% -1.2%
52-week high $160.06$543.45$0.31 $779.14
52-week low $82.93$352.83$0.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleROKUMSFTKDOZF
P/E now vs peer median 65.1xmedian 39.0x 27.6xmedian 27.6x -17.9xmedian 16.7x
P/S now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 4.6x 11.4xmedian 4.6x 0.7xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 60.3xmedian 32.7x 19.0xmedian 25.6x -24.9xmedian 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 32.7xmedian 27.4x 65.7xmedian 15.4x -13.2xmedian 10.5x
P/B now vs peer median 8.2xmedian 3.2x 8.4xmedian 4.1x 2.3xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.82median 1.23 1.21median 0.80 -0.99median 0.39

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsROKUMSFTKDOZF
Revenue $5.21B $346.45B $19.55M
Gross profit $2.37B $234.39B $8.95M
Operating income $273.39M $163.19B -$711.49K
Net income $355.21M $142.63B -$804.75K
Free cash flow $709.91M $59.96B -$1.09M
R&D $736.05M $36.46B $4.44M
EPS (diluted) $2.34 $19.16 $-0.01
Cash & equivalents $2.00B $20.28B $1.34M
Total debt – $35.48B –
Shares (diluted) 151.90M 7.45B 131.30M
Enterprise value $13.39B $3.83T $3.56M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricROKUMSFTKDOZF
P/E 65.1x 27.6x -17.9x
P/FCF 32.7x 65.7x -13.2x
P/Operating cash flow 32.3x 20.1x -13.5x
P/S 4.5x 11.4x 0.7x
P/B 8.2x 8.4x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 8.3x 8.7x 2.3x
EV/EBITDA 60.3x 19.0x -24.9x
EV/EBIT 75.5x 23.9x -18.4x
EV/Revenue 4.0x 11.3x 0.7x
EV/FCF 29.1x 65.2x -12.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 28.7x 20.0x -12.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.82 1.21 -0.99

Growth

14 metrics
MetricROKUMSFTKDOZF
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.5% 17.9% 31.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.4% 16.6% 9.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 22.5% 16.0% 11.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.2% 15.6% 19.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 275.3% 20.0% -249.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 33.4% 20.2% 23.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 677.5% 36.0% -331.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 36.4% 22.8% 18.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 669.1% 36.3% -331.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 35.7% 22.8% 18.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 81.4% 33.2% -162.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 260.2% 27.3% -73.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 82.1% -23.1% -164.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 84.4% -1.8% -69.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricROKUMSFTKDOZF
Gross margin 45.5% 67.7% 45.8%
EBITDA margin 6.6% 59.3% -2.7%
Operating margin 5.2% 47.1% -3.6%
Pretax margin 7.4% 51.3% -3.9%
Net margin 6.8% 41.2% -4.1%
FCF margin 13.6% 17.3% -5.6%
Operating cash flow margin 13.8% 56.5% -5.5%
Return on equity 12.9% 31.2% -10.0%
Return on assets 8.0% 18.6% -7.2%
Return on invested capital – 26.5% –
Return on capital employed 8.5% 26.5% –
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.5x 2.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 1.4x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 6.3% 3.6% 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricROKUMSFTKDOZF
Debt / assets – 4.6% –
Debt / equity – 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.1x –
Debt / FCF – 0.6x –
Liabilities / assets 38.3% 39.6% 28.8%
Equity / assets 61.7% 60.4% 71.2%
Interest coverage 129.4x 50.6x –
Current ratio 2.9x 1.2x –
Quick ratio 2.7x 0.8x –
Cash ratio 2.0x 0.4x –
Altman Z-score 9.48 9.47 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricROKUMSFTKDOZF
Dividend yield – 0.7% –
Net buyback yield 1.1% 0.5% –
Shareholder yield 1.1% 1.2% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 45.1% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 9.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.1% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusROKUMSFTKDOZF
Forward P/E 55.4xFY2026 26.0xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.82FY2026 $20.39FY2027 $-0.01FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +378.0%FY2026 +18.0%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +42.6% +11.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.37BFY2026 $402.39BFY2027 $22.28MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +13.3%FY2026 +21.3%FY2027 +21.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +23.0% +12.9% +9.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersROKUMSFTKDOZF
Held by institutions 76.9% 73.9% –
Institutions holding 778 6,231 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.0% +3.3% –
Institutions buying 435 3,435 –
Institutions selling 241 2,426 –
Buyers to sellers 1.80 1.42 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ROKUMSFTKDOZF
ROKU 1.00 0.25 0.07
MSFT 0.25 1.00 0.09
KDOZF 0.07 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ROKU, MSFT and KDOZF?

Microsoft (MSFT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Roku (ROKU) $22.95B, Microsoft (MSFT) $3.89T, Kidoz (KDOZF) $14.44M.

Which stock is cheaper, ROKU, MSFT and KDOZF?

Microsoft (MSFT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Roku (ROKU) 64.6x, Microsoft (MSFT) 27.3x, Kidoz (KDOZF) -17.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Microsoft (MSFT) is cheapest (Roku (ROKU) 55.4x, Microsoft (MSFT) 26.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kidoz (KDOZF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Roku (ROKU) +18.5%, Microsoft (MSFT) +17.9%, Kidoz (KDOZF) +31.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Microsoft (MSFT) has the highest net margin (Roku (ROKU) 6.8%, Microsoft (MSFT) 41.2%, Kidoz (KDOZF) -4.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Roku (ROKU) returned the most: Roku (ROKU) +58.5%, Microsoft (MSFT) -2.1%, Kidoz (KDOZF) -50.0%. Over five years, Microsoft (MSFT) compounded fastest (Roku (ROKU) -12.5%/yr, Microsoft (MSFT) +9.8%/yr, Kidoz (KDOZF) -27.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Roku (ROKU) 0.00%, Microsoft (MSFT) 0.01%. Roku (ROKU) and Kidoz (KDOZF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Microsoft (MSFT) has been the steadiest (Roku (ROKU) 40.0%, Microsoft (MSFT) 32.6%, Kidoz (KDOZF) 94.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ROKU, MSFT and KDOZF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Microsoft (MSFT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.