ROK vs FTV vs MMM Stock Comparison

Rockwell Automation, Fortive and 3M Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RRX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ROK Rockwell Automation, Inc
$426.18 -1.6% 1M +19.3% 1Y
Market cap
$47.75B
P/E
39.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.97B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
4 wins
FTV Fortive Corp
$60.25 +7.1% 1M +21.4% 1Y
Market cap
$18.47B
P/E
34.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.32B
Div. yield
0.00%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
2 wins
MMM 3M Co
$173.47 +1.9% 1M +1.1% 1Y
Market cap
$89.47B
P/E
25.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

3M leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (3M 6, Rockwell Automation 4, Fortive 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionROKFTVMMMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $47.75B $18.47B $89.47B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.8x 34.6x 25.3x MMM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.1x 18.8x 19.8x FTV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.3% +5.6% +1.7% ROK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.4% 12.4% 14.0% MMM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 21.0% 7.4% 22.0% MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 2.5x 1.6x ROK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% MMM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.3% +21.4% +1.1% FTV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.1%/yr -4.1%/yr +2.8%/yr ROK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.3% 26.7% 25.6% MMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 48/100 49/100 ROK

Percentile Scorecard

ROKFTVMMM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisROKFTVMMM
Valuation 15 #173 of 203 46 #111 of 203 37 #129 of 203
Growth 52 #91 of 188 19 #153 of 188 60 #76 of 188
Profitability 94 #12 of 187 73 #52 of 187 87 #25 of 187
Financial Health 32 #152 of 222 39 #137 of 222 18 #183 of 222
Shareholder Returns 74 #41 of 153 63 #58 of 153 44 #86 of 153
Overall 53 48 49
  • ROK ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • FTV ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodROKFTVMMMSPY
1 month -1.6%+7.1%+1.9% -1.0%
3 months -7.8%-3.3%+0.5% +2.9%
6 months +6.2%-1.4%+18.8% +6.4%
Year to date +9.5%+9.1%+8.4% +11.4%
1 year +19.3%+21.4%+1.1% +13.1%
3 years +60.3%-14.2%+130.2% +79.4%
3 years, per year +17.0%-5.0%+32.1% +21.5%
5 years +34.7%-19.0%+14.8% +67.7%
5 years, per year +6.1%-4.1%+2.8% +10.9%
10 years +246.5%+23.8%+22.4% +255.2%
10 years, per year +13.2%+2.2%+2.0% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureROKFTVMMMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.3%26.7%25.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.7%25.9%24.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.390.590.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.620.800.04 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -45.6%-46.1%-53.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.9%-6.1%-5.6% -2.5%
52-week high $495.08$64.16$183.81 $779.14
52-week low $348.51$49.16$141.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleROKFTVMMM
P/E now vs peer median 39.4xmedian 25.9x 34.3xmedian 25.9x 25.5xmedian 25.9x
P/S now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 1.9x 4.2xmedian 1.9x 3.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 23.9xmedian 13.7x 17.3xmedian 13.7x 16.1xmedian 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 31.5xmedian 21.1x 19.4xmedian 21.1x 33.5xmedian 21.1x
P/B now vs peer median 13.5xmedian 2.3x 3.0xmedian 2.3x 21.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -8.98median 1.19 -4.16median 1.19 0.71median 1.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsROKFTVMMM
Revenue $8.97B $4.32B $25.25B
Gross profit $4.41B $2.73B $9.98B
Operating income $1.77B $786.70M $4.74B
Net income $1.20B $534.40M $3.58B
Free cash flow $1.50B $937.60M $2.68B
R&D $716.00M $262.00M $1.21B
EPS (diluted) $10.76 $1.74 $6.77
Cash & equivalents $479.00M $374.20M $4.84B
Total debt $13.81B $3.51B $15.00B
Shares (diluted) 111.60M 307.60M 522.60M
Enterprise value $45.94B $16.94B $70.91B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricROKFTVMMM
P/E 39.4x 34.3x 25.5x
P/FCF 31.5x 19.4x 33.5x
P/Operating cash flow 27.3x 17.3x 24.7x
P/S 5.3x 4.2x 3.6x
P/B 13.5x 3.0x 21.5x
P/Tangible book 17.0x 4.5x 42.3x
EV/EBITDA 23.9x 17.3x 16.1x
EV/EBIT 28.3x 27.2x 21.0x
EV/Revenue 5.6x 5.0x 3.9x
EV/FCF 33.3x 22.8x 37.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 28.9x 20.3x 27.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -8.98 -4.16 0.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricROKFTVMMM
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.3% 5.6% 1.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.3% -10.3% 10.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.9% 4.2% -1.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 7.5% -7.9% 17.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -7.1% 9.4% -3.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 2.9% -9.9% 33.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 23.8% -30.5% 4.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -5.5% -12.6% 35.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 25.2% -22.8% 7.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.4% -8.3% 35.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 13.8% -30.6% 42.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.8% -6.6% -18.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.9% -34.8% 68.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.6% -7.5% -18.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricROKFTVMMM
Gross margin 49.1% 63.2% 39.5%
EBITDA margin 23.3% 28.6% 24.4%
Operating margin 19.7% 18.2% 18.8%
Pretax margin 14.7% 15.6% 17.5%
Net margin 13.4% 12.4% 14.0%
FCF margin 16.8% 21.7% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 19.3% 24.4% 14.4%
Return on equity 30.9% 8.8% 101.3%
Return on assets 9.8% 4.6% 9.8%
Return on invested capital 21.0% 7.4% 22.0%
Return on capital employed 23.6% 7.6% 18.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.4x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 2.0x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.0% 2.7% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricROKFTVMMM
Debt / assets 29.4% 30.2% 37.9%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.6x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 2.5x 1.6x
Debt / FCF 2.2x 3.7x 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 68.5% 47.7% 89.5%
Equity / assets 31.5% 52.3% 10.5%
Interest coverage 12.8x 12.8x –
Current ratio 1.1x 1.2x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.9x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.3x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 5.85 3.29 4.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricROKFTVMMM
Dividend yield 1.3% 0.4% 1.8%
Net buyback yield 1.5% 10.8% 3.0%
Shareholder yield 2.8% 11.2% 4.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 10.6% 44.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 6.0% 59.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -48.4% 3.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -17.0% -21.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusROKFTVMMM
Forward P/E 34.1xFY2026 18.8xFY2026 19.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $12.50FY2026 $3.20FY2026 $8.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.7%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026 +8.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.3% -3.1% +17.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.50BFY2026 $4.63BFY2026 $23.87BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.9%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +19.4% -6.7% +17.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersROKFTVMMM
Held by institutions 89.2% 100.0% 74.5%
Institutions holding 1,540 803 2,208
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% +2.8% +0.8%
Institutions buying 805 350 914
Institutions selling 437 301 837
Buyers to sellers 1.84 1.16 1.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ROKFTVMMM
ROK 1.00 0.36 0.28
FTV 0.36 1.00 0.37
MMM 0.28 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ROK, FTV and MMM?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rockwell Automation (ROK) $47.75B, Fortive (FTV) $18.47B, 3M (MMM) $89.47B.

Which stock is cheaper, ROK, FTV and MMM?

3M (MMM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rockwell Automation (ROK) 39.8x, Fortive (FTV) 34.6x, 3M (MMM) 25.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fortive (FTV) is cheapest (Rockwell Automation (ROK) 34.1x, Fortive (FTV) 18.8x, 3M (MMM) 19.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rockwell Automation (ROK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rockwell Automation (ROK) +11.3%, Fortive (FTV) +5.6%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

3M (MMM) has the highest net margin (Rockwell Automation (ROK) 13.4%, Fortive (FTV) 12.4%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (Rockwell Automation (ROK) 21.0%, Fortive (FTV) 7.4%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortive (FTV) returned the most: Rockwell Automation (ROK) +19.3%, Fortive (FTV) +21.4%, 3M (MMM) +1.1%. Over five years, Rockwell Automation (ROK) compounded fastest (Rockwell Automation (ROK) +6.1%/yr, Fortive (FTV) -4.1%/yr, 3M (MMM) +2.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

3M (MMM) has the highest dividend yield: Rockwell Automation (ROK) 0.00%, Fortive (FTV) 0.00%, 3M (MMM) 0.02%. Rockwell Automation (ROK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 3M (MMM) has been the steadiest (Rockwell Automation (ROK) 31.3%, Fortive (FTV) 26.7%, 3M (MMM) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ROK, FTV and MMM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, 3M (MMM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.