RL vs CPRI vs LANV Stock Comparison

Ralph Lauren, Capri Holdings and Lanvin Group Holdings Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GOOS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RL Ralph Lauren Corp
$377.65 +11.9% 1M +12.3% 1Y
Market cap
$23.26B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.36B
Div. yield
0.01%
Luxury Goods Consumer Discretionary
4 wins
CPRI Capri Holdings Ltd
$15.86 +2.7% 1M -29.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.87B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Luxury Goods Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Ralph Lauren leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Ralph Lauren 4, Capri Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRLCPRILANVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $23.26B $1.87B $91.62M RL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.7x — — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.5x 7.9x — CPRI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.7% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.8% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 24.6% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.3% -29.9% -61.5% RL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +25.1%/yr -21.3%/yr -38.8%/yr RL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.6% 45.7% 84.0% RL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 67/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

RLCPRILANV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRLCPRILANV
Valuation 22 #36 of 46 – –
Growth 79 #10 of 43 – –
Profitability 90 #5 of 42 – –
Financial Health 75 #14 of 53 21 #42 of 53 2 #52 of 53
Shareholder Returns 70 #11 of 34 – –
Overall 67 – –
  • RL ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • CPRI ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • LANV ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRLCPRILANVSPY
1 month +11.9%+2.7%-16.8% -1.0%
3 months +1.1%+2.7%-30.6% +2.9%
6 months +1.7%-23.1%-46.2% +6.4%
Year to date +6.8%-35.0%-58.2% +11.4%
1 year +12.3%-29.9%-61.5% +13.1%
3 years +223.7%-69.0%-77.8% +79.4%
3 years, per year +48.0%-32.3%-39.5% +21.5%
5 years +206.7%-69.8%-91.4% +67.7%
5 years, per year +25.1%-21.3%-38.8% +10.9%
10 years +290.8%-67.6%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +14.6%-10.7%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureRLCPRILANVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.6%45.7%84.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.8%45.7%85.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.211.35-0.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.36-0.65-0.73 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.4%-82.4%-91.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -8.8%-42.7%-62.3% -2.5%
52-week high $414.25$27.66$2.23 $779.14
52-week low $309.29$12.71$0.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRLCPRILANV
P/E now vs peer median 23.1xmedian 15.9x —median 15.9x —median 15.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 0.7x —median 0.7x —median 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.8xmedian 9.2x —median 9.2x —median 9.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.8xmedian 12.2x —median 12.2x —median 12.2x
P/B now vs peer median 8.3xmedian 2.2x 22.5xmedian 2.2x -0.3xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.86median 0.57 —median 0.57 —median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRLCPRILANV
Revenue $8.36B – –
Gross profit $5.87B – –
Operating income $1.25B – –
Net income $982.90M – –
Free cash flow $1.04B – –
EPS (diluted) $16.03 – –
Cash & equivalents $1.72B $135.00M $30.19M
Total debt $4.95B $535.47M $454.21M
Shares (diluted) 61.30M 120.60M –
Enterprise value $15.35B $1.33B -$41.38M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRLCPRILANV
P/E 23.1x – –
P/FCF 21.8x – –
P/Operating cash flow 17.2x – –
P/S 2.7x – –
P/B 8.3x 22.5x -0.3x
P/Tangible book 8.6x -4.0x -0.2x
EV/EBITDA 14.8x – –
EV/EBIT 17.6x – –
EV/Revenue 2.6x – –
EV/FCF 21.1x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 16.7x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.86 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRLCPRILANV
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.7% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.0% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.7% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.8% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 25.2% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.5% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 23.7% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 22.8% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 26.1% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.7% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 16.2% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.4% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 36.6% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.6% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRLCPRILANV
Gross margin 70.3% – –
EBITDA margin 17.8% – –
Operating margin 14.9% – –
Pretax margin 14.9% – –
Net margin 11.8% – –
FCF margin 12.5% – –
Operating cash flow margin 15.8% – –
Return on equity 35.3% – –
Return on assets 12.8% – –
Return on invested capital 24.6% – –
Return on capital employed 21.4% – –
Asset turnover 1.1x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x – –
Stock comp / revenue 1.4% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRLCPRILANV
Debt / assets 16.2% 11.0% 90.8%
Debt / equity 0.5x 4.3x -1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x – –
Debt / FCF 1.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 64.5% 97.4% 180.5%
Equity / assets 35.5% 2.6% -80.5%
Interest coverage 22.4x – –
Current ratio 2.0x 1.2x 0.2x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.4x 0.1x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 6.25 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRLCPRILANV
Dividend yield 1.0% – –
Net buyback yield 2.8% – –
Shareholder yield 3.8% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) 22.4% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 21.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 8.0% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.4% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRLCPRILANV
Forward P/E 20.5xFY2026 7.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $18.46FY2026 $2.01FY2026 $-1.33FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +11.3%FY2026 +34.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +20.3% +31.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.11BFY2026 $3.21BFY2026 $248.99MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -0.1%FY2026 -7.6%FY2026 -11.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.3% +13.7% -7.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRLCPRILANV
Held by institutions 65.2% 98.0% –
Institutions holding 808 295 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.6% -4.2% –
Institutions buying 388 136 –
Institutions selling 324 101 –
Buyers to sellers 1.20 1.35 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RLCPRILANV
RL 1.00 0.53 0.03
CPRI 0.53 1.00 0.05
LANV 0.03 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RL, CPRI and LANV?

Ralph Lauren (RL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ralph Lauren (RL) $23.26B, Capri Holdings (CPRI) $1.87B, Lanvin Group Holdings (LANV) $91.62M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ralph Lauren (RL) returned the most: Ralph Lauren (RL) +12.3%, Capri Holdings (CPRI) -29.9%, Lanvin Group Holdings (LANV) -61.5%. Over five years, Ralph Lauren (RL) compounded fastest (Ralph Lauren (RL) +25.1%/yr, Capri Holdings (CPRI) -21.3%/yr, Lanvin Group Holdings (LANV) -38.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ralph Lauren (RL) 0.01%, Capri Holdings (CPRI) 0.00%, Lanvin Group Holdings (LANV) 0.00%. Capri Holdings (CPRI) and Lanvin Group Holdings (LANV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ralph Lauren (RL) has been the steadiest (Ralph Lauren (RL) 34.6%, Capri Holdings (CPRI) 45.7%, Lanvin Group Holdings (LANV) 84.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RL, CPRI and LANV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ralph Lauren (RL) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.