RKT vs UWMC vs PFSI Stock Comparison

Rocket Companies, UWM Holdings and PennyMac Financial Services Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (WD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc.
$13.82 +18.1% 1M -18.2% 1Y
Market cap
$42.31B
P/E
32.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.46B
Div. yield
0.00%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
4 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.60 +26.0% 1M -72.6% 1Y
Market cap
$572.11M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

PennyMac Financial Services leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (PennyMac Financial Services 7, Rocket Companies 4, UWM Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRKTUWMCPFSILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $42.31B $572.11M $3.50B RKT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 32.4x -15.4x 14.6x PFSI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.0x 8.4x 13.8x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +90.4% +26.1% +3.5% RKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.4% -1.0% 11.7% PFSI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 4.5% 6.3% 11.2% PFSI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 6.0x 10.6x 2.9x PFSI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% PFSI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -18.2% -72.6% -49.7% RKT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.0%/yr -26.1%/yr -0.2%/yr PFSI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.2% 80.3% 52.4% PFSI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 35/100 53/100 RKT

Percentile Scorecard

RKTUWMCPFSI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRKTUWMCPFSI
Valuation 39 #103 of 168 17 #139 of 168 47 #90 of 168
Growth 100 #1 of 163 17 #136 of 163 70 #50 of 163
Profitability 47 #82 of 154 30 #108 of 154 46 #83 of 154
Financial Health 53 #76 of 162 17 #134 of 162 42 #94 of 162
Shareholder Returns 33 #92 of 137 93 #10 of 137 61 #54 of 137
Overall 55 35 53
  • RKT ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UWMC ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit
  • PFSI ranked among 173 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRKTUWMCPFSISPY
1 month +18.1%+26.0%+2.9% -2.0%
3 months -2.1%-17.9%-17.1% -2.2%
6 months -1.9%-53.4%-27.0% +4.2%
Year to date -28.6%-63.5%-51.6% +10.6%
1 year -18.2%-72.6%-49.7% +10.4%
3 years +60.1%-70.5%-12.0% +73.6%
3 years, per year +17.0%-33.4%-4.2% +20.2%
5 years -22.6%-77.9%-1.2% +61.6%
5 years, per year -5.0%-26.1%-0.2% +10.1%
10 years ——+272.2% +261.3%
10 years, per year ——+14.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRKTUWMCPFSISPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.2%80.3%52.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.1%90.1%67.5% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.091.360.80 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.31-0.90-0.95 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.8%-89.5%-63.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -41.0%-73.8%-60.0% -3.2%
52-week high $23.44$6.10$159.46 $779.14
52-week low $10.53$1.00$57.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRKTUWMCPFSI
P/E now vs peer median 30.1xmedian 11.8x -14.5xmedian 11.8x 13.8xmedian 11.8x
P/S now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 2.7x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 1.6xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.7xmedian 13.1x 15.5xmedian 13.1x 5.2xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.8xmedian 6.0x -0.5xmedian 6.0x -13.2xmedian 6.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 0.7x 2.6xmedian 0.7x 0.8xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.12median 0.33 0.28median 0.33 5.24median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRKTUWMCPFSI
Revenue $11.46B $3.58B $2.05B
Net income $1.30B -$104.96M $239.53M
Free cash flow $1.16B -$4.92B -$251.61M
EPS (diluted) $0.46 $-0.11 $4.51
Cash & equivalents $2.70B $498.41M $233.35M
Total debt $24.90B $6.02B $4.84B
Shares (diluted) 2.85B 337.53M 53.13M
Enterprise value $31.12B -$1.72B $737.12M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRKTUWMCPFSI
P/E 30.1x -14.5x 13.8x
P/FCF 33.8x -0.5x -13.2x
P/Operating cash flow 29.7x -0.5x -14.2x
P/S 3.4x 0.7x 1.6x
P/B 1.6x 2.6x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 9.7x -0.6x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA 16.7x 15.5x 5.2x
EV/EBIT 19.9x 17.4x 5.6x
EV/Revenue 5.4x 2.3x 3.7x
EV/FCF 53.0x -1.6x -29.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 46.6x -1.7x -32.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.12 0.28 5.24

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRKTUWMCPFSI
Revenue growth (1Y) 90.4% 26.1% 3.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 47.3% 27.3% 14.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 275.7% -175.0% -52.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 58.8% -31.9% 3.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 1,042% -287.6% -51.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 248.8% -51.2% 2.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 254.5% -103.1% 87.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 181.6% -18.2% 46.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 225.4% -100.4% 86.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 121.4% -18.4% 45.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRKTUWMCPFSI
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 32.2% 14.6% 70.3%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 15.8% -3.2% 15.3%
Net margin 11.4% -1.0% 11.7%
FCF margin 10.1% -137.6% -12.3%
Operating cash flow margin 11.5% -135.9% -11.4%
Return on equity 5.4% -8.1% 5.5%
Return on assets 2.2% -0.6% 0.8%
Return on invested capital 4.5% 6.3% 11.2%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 46.3x -1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 3.8% 1.6% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRKTUWMCPFSI
Debt / assets 41.4% 33.5% 16.2%
Debt / equity 1.0x 6.1x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 6.0x 10.6x 2.9x
Debt / FCF 21.5x -1.2x -19.2x
Liabilities / assets 59.6% 94.5% 85.4%
Equity / assets 40.4% 5.5% 14.6%
Interest coverage 2.4x 0.8x 1.3x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRKTUWMCPFSI
Dividend yield 0.0% 18.7% 1.9%
Net buyback yield -0.2% – 1.3%
Shareholder yield -0.2% 18.7% 3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 1.0% – 26.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) 1.1% – -25.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) -94.5% – 1.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 15.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRKTUWMCPFSI
Forward P/E 23.0xFY2026 8.4xFY2026 13.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.60FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $4.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +114.3%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026 -50.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.7% +26.3% +125.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.31BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026 $2.30BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +68.8%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.4% +37.3% +13.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRKTUWMCPFSI
Held by institutions 50.4% 17.0% 64.8%
Institutions holding 796 291 229
Change in shares held, QoQ +16.2% +31.8% -0.5%
Institutions buying 429 214 132
Institutions selling 261 50 66
Buyers to sellers 1.64 4.28 2.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RKTUWMCPFSI
RKT 1.00 0.51 0.56
UWMC 0.51 1.00 0.38
PFSI 0.56 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RKT, UWMC and PFSI?

Rocket Companies (RKT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rocket Companies (RKT) $42.31B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $572.11M, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) $3.50B.

Which stock is cheaper, RKT, UWMC and PFSI?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rocket Companies (RKT) 32.4x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -15.4x, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 14.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Rocket Companies (RKT) 23.0x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 8.4x, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 13.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rocket Companies (RKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rocket Companies (RKT) +90.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) +3.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) has the highest net margin (Rocket Companies (RKT) 11.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 11.7%). On return on invested capital, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) leads (Rocket Companies (RKT) 4.5%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 11.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rocket Companies (RKT) returned the most: Rocket Companies (RKT) -18.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -72.6%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) -49.7%. Over five years, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) compounded fastest (Rocket Companies (RKT) -5.0%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.1%/yr, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) -0.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) has the highest dividend yield: Rocket Companies (RKT) 0.00%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 0.02%. UWM Holdings (UWMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) has been the steadiest (Rocket Companies (RKT) 59.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.3%, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 52.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RKT, UWMC and PFSI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.