RKT vs RMSG vs WD Stock Comparison

Rocket Companies, Real Messenger and Walker & Dunlop Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FMCC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc.
$11.89 +1.7% 1M -26.8% 1Y
Market cap
$44.65B
P/E
25.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
4 wins
RMSG Real Messenger Corp
$0.21 -30.0% 1M -91.2% 1Y
Market cap
$1.87M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
WD Walker & Dunlop, Inc.
$34.69 -4.4% 1M -56.5% 1Y
Market cap
$1.15B
P/E
30.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.29B
Div. yield
7.81%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Rocket Companies leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Rocket Companies 4, Walker & Dunlop 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRKTRMSGWDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $44.65B $1.87M $1.15B RKT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.9x -0.5x 30.0x RKT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.8x — 8.2x WD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +8.0% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 3.0% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 3.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 1.8x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 7.81% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -26.8% -91.2% -56.5% RKT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -6.3%/yr -53.8%/yr -23.2%/yr RKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.4% 257.3% 46.3% WD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — 47/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

RKTRMSGWD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRKTRMSGWD
Valuation 20 #136 of 169 0 #18 of 18 46 #91 of 169
Growth – – 30 #111 of 159
Profitability – – 37 #93 of 146
Financial Health – 67 #6 of 16 70 #46 of 153
Shareholder Returns – – 50 #68 of 135
Overall – – 47
  • RKT ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • RMSG ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • WD ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRKTRMSGWDSPY
1 month +1.7%-30.0%-4.4% +0.7%
3 months -10.3%-38.2%-29.3% +3.7%
6 months -18.7%-86.5%-31.1% +7.1%
Year to date -38.6%-84.4%-42.3% +12.8%
1 year -26.8%-91.2%-56.5% +11.9%
3 years +62.7%-98.2%-45.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year +17.6%-73.7%-18.5% +22.8%
5 years -27.9%-97.9%-73.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year -6.3%-53.8%-23.2% +10.9%
10 years ——+45.6% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——+3.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRKTRMSGWDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.4%257.3%46.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.0%188.6%52.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.251.081.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.46-0.35-1.22 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.8%-99.4%-79.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.3%-93.0%-56.8% -1.2%
52-week high $23.44$2.99$80.30 $779.14
52-week low $10.53$0.21$31.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRKTRMSGWD
P/E now vs peer median 25.9xmedian 11.7x -0.5xmedian 21.0x 30.0xmedian 11.7x
P/S now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 2.7x 63.5xmedian 0.7x 0.9xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.1x —median 10.7x 4.8xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -56.9xmedian 6.5x -0.5xmedian 13.5x -8.8xmedian 6.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 0.7x 3.8xmedian 1.9x 0.7xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.10median 0.33 —median 0.56 -0.84median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRKTRMSGWD
Revenue – – $1.29B
Net income – – $41.08M
Free cash flow – – -$131.24M
EPS (diluted) $0.46 – $1.15
Cash & equivalents $2.70B $321.97K $160.86M
Total debt – – $820.95M
Shares (diluted) 2.84B 8.91M 33.28M
Enterprise value $44.65B -$7.67M $239.37M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRKTRMSGWD
P/E 25.9x -0.5x 30.0x
P/FCF -56.9x -0.5x -8.8x
P/Operating cash flow – – -9.7x
P/S 4.4x 63.5x 0.9x
P/B 1.8x 3.8x 0.7x
P/Tangible book 11.0x 3.8x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA – – 4.8x
EV/EBIT – – 13.9x
EV/Revenue – – 1.4x
EV/FCF – – -13.8x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -15.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.10 – -0.84

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRKTRMSGWD
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 8.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 5.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – – -61.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -33.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 1,044% – -65.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 248.8% – -35.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 37.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 7.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 35.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 8.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRKTRMSGWD
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – – 29.3%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – – 4.3%
Net margin – – 3.0%
FCF margin – – -10.2%
Operating cash flow margin – – -9.3%
Return on equity 5.4% – 2.4%
Return on assets 2.2% – 0.7%
Return on invested capital – – 3.8%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – – 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – -2.9x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRKTRMSGWD
Debt / assets – – 16.8%
Debt / equity – – 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 1.8x
Debt / FCF – – -6.3x
Liabilities / assets 59.6% 51.1% 64.9%
Equity / assets 40.4% 48.9% 35.1%
Interest coverage – – 1.7x
Current ratio – 1.8x –
Quick ratio – 0.7x –
Cash ratio – 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRKTRMSGWD
Dividend yield – – 7.8%
Net buyback yield – – 1.8%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 9.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 226.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -70.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 3.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 4.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRKTRMSGWD
Forward P/E 19.8xFY2026 – 8.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.60FY2026 – $4.23FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +114.3%FY2026 – +157.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +21.7% – +15.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $11.31BFY2026 – $1.21BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +68.8%FY2026 – -1.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.4% – +9.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRKTRMSGWD
Held by institutions 50.4% – 89.0%
Institutions holding 794 – 266
Change in shares held, QoQ +16.2% – +3.5%
Institutions buying 429 – 160
Institutions selling 259 – 59
Buyers to sellers 1.66 – 2.71

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RKTRMSGWD
RKT 1.00 0.09 0.40
RMSG 0.09 1.00 0.06
WD 0.40 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RKT, RMSG and WD?

Rocket Companies (RKT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rocket Companies (RKT) $44.65B, Real Messenger (RMSG) $1.87M, Walker & Dunlop (WD) $1.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, RKT, RMSG and WD?

Rocket Companies (RKT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Rocket Companies (RKT) 25.9x, Real Messenger (RMSG) -0.5x, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 30.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Walker & Dunlop (WD) is cheapest (Rocket Companies (RKT) 19.8x, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 8.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rocket Companies (RKT) returned the most: Rocket Companies (RKT) -26.8%, Real Messenger (RMSG) -91.2%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) -56.5%. Over five years, Rocket Companies (RKT) compounded fastest (Rocket Companies (RKT) -6.3%/yr, Real Messenger (RMSG) -53.8%/yr, Walker & Dunlop (WD) -23.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Rocket Companies (RKT) 0.00%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 7.81%. Rocket Companies (RKT) and Real Messenger (RMSG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Walker & Dunlop (WD) has been the steadiest (Rocket Companies (RKT) 58.4%, Real Messenger (RMSG) 257.3%, Walker & Dunlop (WD) 46.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RKT, RMSG and WD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rocket Companies (RKT) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.