RGTI vs QBTS vs QNC Stock Comparison

Rigetti Computing, D-Wave Quantum and Quantum eMotion Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc.
$12.06 -23.4% 1M -69.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.66B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$13.35M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
2 wins
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc.
$11.56 -29.6% 1M -66.3% 1Y
Market cap
$3.80B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$12.43M
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
4 wins
QNC Quantum eMotion Corp
$1.11 -36.6% 1M
Market cap
$180.65M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Quantum Computing Technology
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

D-Wave Quantum leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (D-Wave Quantum 4, Rigetti Computing 2, Quantum eMotion 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRGTIQBTSQNCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.66B $3.80B $180.65M QBTS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -15.3x -15.3x -39.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +68.5% -44.2% — RGTI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -1,787.4% -2,001.6% — RGTI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -12.3% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -69.4% -66.3% — QBTS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.8%/yr +3.3%/yr — QBTS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 93.6% 100.2% 93.6% QNC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 32/100 33/100 — QBTS

Percentile Scorecard

RGTIQBTSQNC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRGTIQBTSQNC
Valuation 14 #107 of 124 20 #100 of 124 11 #110 of 124
Growth 20 #91 of 113 12 #100 of 113 –
Profitability 9 #99 of 109 15 #93 of 109 –
Financial Health 89 #15 of 127 92 #11 of 127 94 #8 of 127
Shareholder Returns 27 #46 of 63 26 #47 of 63 –
Overall 32 33 –
  • RGTI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • QBTS ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • QNC ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRGTIQBTSQNCSPY
1 month -23.4%-29.6%-36.6% +0.7%
3 months -18.8%-35.7%-47.6% +3.7%
6 months -30.9%-43.0%-60.8% +7.1%
Year to date -45.6%-55.8%— +12.8%
1 year -69.4%-66.3%— +11.9%
3 years +1,016.7%+1,706.3%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +123.6%+162.6%— +22.8%
5 years +14.6%+17.7%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +2.8%+3.3%— +10.9%

Risk

MeasureRGTIQBTSQNCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 93.6%100.2%93.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 89.6%93.3%95.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.904.152.93 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.74-0.66— 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -96.9%-96.7%-72.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -72.8%-68.8%-70.7% -1.2%
52-week high $44.27$37.06$3.79 $779.14
52-week low $11.44$11.54$1.06 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRGTIQBTSQNC
P/E now vs peer median -16.8xmedian 39.0x -17.2xmedian 39.0x 478.5xmedian 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median 301.4xmedian 4.6x 346.1xmedian 4.6x 226,929xmedian 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -41.6xmedian 32.7x -23.5xmedian 32.7x —median 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -45.9xmedian 27.4x -36.1xmedian 27.4x 13,821xmedian 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 3.2x 4.0xmedian 3.2x 9.0xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 4.26median 1.23 11.59median 1.23 —median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRGTIQBTSQNC
Revenue $13.35M $12.43M –
Gross profit $4.62M $7.98M –
Operating income -$97.16M -$170.58M –
Net income -$238.67M -$248.70M -$9.47M
Free cash flow -$87.58M -$119.08M –
R&D $73.05M $81.78M $1.04M
EPS (diluted) $-0.72 $-0.67 $-0.02
Cash & equivalents $27.76M $296.64M $222.23K
Total debt – $35.03M –
Shares (diluted) 333.22M 370.84M 186.70M
Enterprise value $1.96B $943.93M $93.72M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRGTIQBTSQNC
P/E -16.8x -17.2x 478.5x
P/FCF -45.9x -36.1x 13,821x
P/Operating cash flow -66.3x -38.8x –
P/S 301.4x 346.1x 226,929x
P/B 7.5x 4.0x 9.0x
P/Tangible book 7.5x 4.9x 12.2x
EV/EBITDA -41.6x -23.5x –
EV/EBIT -37.4x -22.2x –
EV/Revenue 271.9x 305.0x –
EV/FCF -41.5x -31.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow -59.8x -34.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.26 11.59 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRGTIQBTSQNC
Revenue growth (1Y) 68.5% -44.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.5% 19.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 43.8% -56.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -26.6% 31.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -25.6% -116.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -0.3% -27.8% –
Net income growth (1Y) -44.8% 11.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -42.8% -45.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) -29.6% 28.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.0% -1.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -12.9% -119.0% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 0.3% -28.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -33.6% -124.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.5% -30.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRGTIQBTSQNC
Gross margin 34.6% 64.2% –
EBITDA margin -653.3% -1,297% –
Operating margin -727.6% -1,373% –
Pretax margin -1,787% -1,267% –
Net margin -1,787% -2,002% –
FCF margin -655.9% -958.4% –
Operating cash flow margin -454.7% -892.4% –
Return on equity -42.6% -11.7% –
Return on assets -36.7% -10.9% –
Return on invested capital – -12.3% –
Return on capital employed -17.8% -14.8% –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 170.7% 250.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRGTIQBTSQNC
Debt / assets – 3.0% –
Debt / equity – 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.2x –
Debt / FCF – -0.3x –
Liabilities / assets 17.1% 6.5% 21.0%
Equity / assets 82.9% 93.5% 79.0%
Interest coverage – -180.3x –
Current ratio 3.9x 20.5x 33.3x
Quick ratio 3.8x 20.1x 35.0x
Cash ratio 3.7x 20.0x 35.0x
Altman Z-score 20.18 33.07 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRGTIQBTSQNC
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -1.3% -1.4% –
Shareholder yield -1.3% -1.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRGTIQBTSQNC
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.20FY2026 $-0.31FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $22.61MFY2026 $40.06MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +218.9%FY2026 +62.9%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +115.1% +112.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRGTIQBTSQNC
Held by institutions 52.1% 53.1% 31.6%
Institutions holding 476 550 38
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.0% +12.5% +1,128.1%
Institutions buying 307 370 22
Institutions selling 87 100 7
Buyers to sellers 3.53 3.70 3.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RGTIQBTSQNC
RGTI 1.00 0.93 0.45
QBTS 0.93 1.00 0.42
QNC 0.45 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RGTI, QBTS and QNC?

D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Rigetti Computing (RGTI) $3.66B, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) $3.80B, Quantum eMotion (QNC) $180.65M.

Which company is growing faster?

Rigetti Computing (RGTI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Rigetti Computing (RGTI) +68.5%, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) -44.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rigetti Computing (RGTI) has the highest net margin (Rigetti Computing (RGTI) -1,787.4%, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) -2,001.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) returned the most: Rigetti Computing (RGTI) -69.4%, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) -66.3%. Over five years, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) compounded fastest (Rigetti Computing (RGTI) +2.8%/yr, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) +3.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Quantum eMotion (QNC) has been the steadiest (Rigetti Computing (RGTI) 93.6%, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) 100.2%, Quantum eMotion (QNC) 93.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RGTI, QBTS and QNC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.