RGC vs MRK vs NVS Stock Comparison

Regencell Bioscience Holdings, Merck and Novartis Ag Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ABBV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MRK Merck & Co., Inc.
$144.68 +0.3% 1M +75.4% 1Y
Market cap
$370.06B
P/E
116.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$66.57B
Div. yield
0.02%
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
2 wins
NVS Novartis Ag
$159.27 +12.9% 1M +28.6% 1Y
Market cap
$319.62B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Pharmaceuticals Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Novartis Ag leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Novartis Ag 3, Merck 2, Regencell Bioscience Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRGCMRKNVSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $2.65B $370.06B $319.62B MRK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -259.9x 116.6x 17.9x NVS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 58.3x 17.2x NVS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +4.6% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 4.8% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 3.6% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -54.6% +75.4% +28.6% MRK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +62.1%/yr +9.8%/yr +13.7%/yr RGC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 141.4% 29.7% 27.6% NVS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 61/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

RGCMRKNVS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRGCMRKNVS
Valuation 39 #389 of 634 80 #131 of 634 97 #20 of 634
Growth – 37 #386 of 607 –
Profitability – 91 #53 of 557 –
Financial Health 90 #66 of 654 20 #521 of 654 –
Shareholder Returns – 80 #83 of 401 78 #88 of 401
Overall – 61 –
  • RGC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • MRK ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • NVS ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRGCMRKNVSSPY
1 month -9.8%+0.3%+12.9% -2.0%
3 months +1.7%+13.0%+3.9% -2.2%
6 months -77.4%+27.9%+9.5% +4.2%
Year to date -70.7%+37.5%+15.5% +10.6%
1 year -54.6%+75.4%+28.6% +10.4%
3 years +1,565.8%+39.9%+71.7% +73.6%
3 years, per year +155.6%+11.9%+19.8% +20.2%
5 years +1,015.9%+59.8%+90.3% +61.6%
5 years, per year +62.1%+9.8%+13.7% +10.1%
10 years —+147.6%+127.8% +261.3%
10 years, per year —+9.5%+8.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRGCMRKNVSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 141.4%29.7%27.6% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 131.3%24.3%30.0% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.520.090.33 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.392.541.03 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -93.9%-44.7%-20.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -88.4%-7.5%-5.5% -3.2%
52-week high $52.88$156.45$168.62 $779.14
52-week low $4.78$82.49$123.86 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRGCMRKNVS
P/E now vs peer median -259.9xmedian 18.4x 112.6xmedian 18.4x 17.9xmedian 18.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 9.0x 5.4xmedian 9.0x 5.1xmedian 9.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 16.0x 30.8xmedian 16.0x —median 16.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -396.3xmedian 21.8x 22.2xmedian 21.8x 14.3xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 228.5xmedian 2.1x 8.5xmedian 2.1x —median 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.37 70.89median 0.37 —median 0.37

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRGCMRKNVS
Revenue – $66.57B –
Gross profit – $48.57B –
Operating income – $6.38B –
Net income – $3.17B –
Free cash flow – $16.06B –
R&D – $30.45B –
EPS (diluted) – $1.28 –
Cash & equivalents $14.19M $6.85B $400.00M
Total debt $10.79K $53.91B –
Shares (diluted) 494.60M 2.47B 1.96B
Enterprise value $2.62B $324.43B $292.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRGCMRKNVS
P/E -259.9x 112.6x 17.9x
P/FCF -396.3x 22.2x 14.3x
P/Operating cash flow – 17.9x –
P/S – 5.4x 5.1x
P/B 228.5x 8.5x –
P/Tangible book 228.5x 21.0x –
EV/EBITDA – 30.8x –
EV/EBIT – 63.3x –
EV/Revenue – 6.1x –
EV/FCF – 25.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 20.2x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 70.89 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRGCMRKNVS
Revenue growth (1Y) – 4.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 4.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 4.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -66.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 1.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) – -80.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 0.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) – -80.3% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 1.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 7.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 9.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 14.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRGCMRKNVS
Gross margin – 73.0% –
EBITDA margin – 19.7% –
Operating margin – 9.6% –
Pretax margin – 8.9% –
Net margin – 4.8% –
FCF margin – 24.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 30.0% –
Return on equity – 7.2% –
Return on assets – 2.5% –
Return on invested capital – 3.6% –
Return on capital employed – 6.3% –
Asset turnover – 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 6.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRGCMRKNVS
Debt / assets 0.1% 41.5% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.6x –
Debt / FCF – 3.4x –
Liabilities / assets 9.4% 67.7% –
Equity / assets 90.6% 32.3% –
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 10.8x 1.3x –
Quick ratio 10.7x 0.7x –
Cash ratio 10.7x 0.3x –
Altman Z-score – 3.88 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRGCMRKNVS
Dividend yield – 2.4% 3.0%
Net buyback yield – 1.1% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 3.5% 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 261.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 51.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 4.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRGCMRKNVS
Forward P/E – 58.3xFY2026 17.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.48FY2026 $9.26FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -72.4%FY2026 +3.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +257.3% +1.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $69.45BFY2026 $53.95BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +6.8%FY2026 -1.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -3.8% +19.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRGCMRKNVS
Held by institutions 0.3% 79.9% 7.0%
Institutions holding 36 3,802 1,609
Change in shares held, QoQ +116.7% +2.6% -5.9%
Institutions buying 28 1,843 662
Institutions selling 5 1,468 562
Buyers to sellers 5.60 1.26 1.18

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RGCMRKNVS
RGC 1.00 -0.03 0.06
MRK -0.03 1.00 0.48
NVS 0.06 0.48 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RGC, MRK and NVS?

Merck (MRK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) $2.65B, Merck (MRK) $370.06B, Novartis Ag (NVS) $319.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, RGC, MRK and NVS?

Novartis Ag (NVS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) -259.9x, Merck (MRK) 116.6x, Novartis Ag (NVS) 17.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Novartis Ag (NVS) is cheapest (Merck (MRK) 58.3x, Novartis Ag (NVS) 17.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Merck (MRK) returned the most: Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) -54.6%, Merck (MRK) +75.4%, Novartis Ag (NVS) +28.6%. Over five years, Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) compounded fastest (Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) +62.1%/yr, Merck (MRK) +9.8%/yr, Novartis Ag (NVS) +13.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) 0.00%, Merck (MRK) 0.02%, Novartis Ag (NVS) 0.00%. Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) and Novartis Ag (NVS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Novartis Ag (NVS) has been the steadiest (Regencell Bioscience Holdings (RGC) 141.4%, Merck (MRK) 29.7%, Novartis Ag (NVS) 27.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RGC, MRK and NVS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Novartis Ag (NVS) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.