RF vs UWMC vs TFC Stock Comparison

Regions Financial, UWM Holdings and Truist Financial Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KEY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.41 +4.3% 1M +17.1% 1Y
Market cap
$24.62B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
8 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.51 +20.8% 1M -74.1% 1Y
Market cap
$511.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins
TFC Truist Financial Corp
$48.44 +2.8% 1M +9.3% 1Y
Market cap
$59.61B
P/E
12.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.41B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Regions Financial leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Regions Financial 8, Truist Financial 2, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRFUWMCTFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.62B $511.35M $59.61B TFC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.4x -13.8x 12.2x RF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.1x 7.9x 11.3x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.4% +26.1% -3.6% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 28.2% -1.0% 25.1% RF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.6% 6.3% 10.2% RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 10.6x 4.1x RF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.04% 0.00% 0.04% TFC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.1% -74.1% +9.3% RF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.7%/yr -26.0%/yr -5.3%/yr RF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.3% 80.2% 23.4% RF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 35/100 33/100 RF

Percentile Scorecard

RFUWMCTFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRFUWMCTFC
Valuation 22 #281 of 361 20 #136 of 169 43 #206 of 361
Growth 9 #157 of 172 16 #137 of 162 15 #146 of 172
Profitability 47 #80 of 149 30 #105 of 149 41 #89 of 149
Financial Health 54 #74 of 158 17 #132 of 158 21 #125 of 158
Shareholder Returns 64 #122 of 338 94 #9 of 136 46 #182 of 338
Overall 39 35 33
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • TFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRFUWMCTFCSPY
1 month +4.3%+20.8%+2.8% +0.9%
3 months -8.1%-24.1%-7.4% +5.9%
6 months +1.4%-56.5%-4.4% +8.5%
Year to date +4.8%-65.5%-1.6% +13.3%
1 year +17.1%-74.1%+9.3% +12.4%
3 years +102.8%-69.7%+75.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year +26.6%-32.9%+20.6% +23.5%
5 years +20.0%-77.8%-23.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year +3.7%-26.0%-5.3% +11.0%
10 years +166.8%—+23.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year +10.3%—+2.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureRFUWMCTFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.3%80.2%23.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.5%89.8%26.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.651.470.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.73-0.920.40 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.9%-89.5%-61.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.3%-75.2%-13.2% -0.9%
52-week high $32.40$6.10$55.81 $779.14
52-week low $24.07$1.00$43.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRFUWMCTFC
P/E now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 12.1x -13.7xmedian 11.4x 12.0xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 3.0xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 5.1x 15.2xmedian 11.3x 7.7xmedian 5.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.5xmedian 10.8x -0.5xmedian 6.9x 9.6xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.2x 2.5xmedian 0.7x 0.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 5.17median 1.32 0.27median 0.34 -781.84median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRFUWMCTFC
Revenue $7.62B $3.58B $19.41B
Net income $2.23B -$104.96M $5.19B
Free cash flow $1.67B -$4.92B $6.06B
EPS (diluted) $2.51 $-0.11 $3.97
Cash & equivalents – $498.41M –
Total debt $7.63B $19.23B $65.79B
Shares (diluted) 857.00M 337.53M 1.23B
Enterprise value $24.62B -$1.79B $59.61B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRFUWMCTFC
P/E 11.3x -13.7x 12.0x
P/FCF 14.5x -0.5x 9.6x
P/Operating cash flow 13.6x -0.5x 9.6x
P/S 3.2x 0.7x 3.0x
P/B 1.3x 2.5x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 1.3x -0.6x 1.0x
EV/EBITDA 6.5x 15.2x 7.7x
EV/EBIT 6.6x 17.1x 8.1x
EV/Revenue 4.2x 2.2x 6.4x
EV/FCF 19.1x -1.6x 20.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.9x -1.6x 20.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.17 0.27 -781.84

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRFUWMCTFC
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.4% 26.1% -3.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.7% 27.3% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 7.5% -175.0% -0.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.1% -31.9% -3.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 15.6% -287.6% 5.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.2% -51.2% 0.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -33.7% -103.1% 54.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.7% -18.2% -14.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -30.0% -100.4% 54.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.9% -18.4% -14.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRFUWMCTFC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 64.2% 14.6% 83.0%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 37.4% -3.2% 30.7%
Net margin 28.2% -1.0% 25.1%
FCF margin 21.9% -137.6% 31.2%
Operating cash flow margin 23.3% -135.9% 31.2%
Return on equity 11.8% -8.1% 8.3%
Return on assets 1.4% -0.6% 0.9%
Return on invested capital 14.6% 6.3% 10.2%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 46.3x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRFUWMCTFC
Debt / assets 4.7% 33.5% 11.9%
Debt / equity 0.4x 6.1x 1.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 10.6x 4.1x
Debt / FCF 4.6x -1.2x 10.9x
Liabilities / assets 88.3% 94.5% 88.9%
Equity / assets 11.7% 5.5% 11.1%
Interest coverage 2.5x 0.8x 1.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRFUWMCTFC
Dividend yield 3.9% 19.9% 4.3%
Net buyback yield 4.7% – 7.4%
Shareholder yield 8.6% 19.9% 11.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 41.1% – 49.5%
Payout ratio (FCF) 55.0% – 42.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.8% – -4.9%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.5% – -2.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRFUWMCTFC
Forward P/E 10.1xFY2026 7.9xFY2026 11.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.80FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $4.28FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.2%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026 +12.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.3% +26.3% +18.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.33BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026 $19.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.3%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026 -4.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.2% +37.3% +1.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRFUWMCTFC
Held by institutions 84.8% 17.0% 76.7%
Institutions holding 1,105 290 1,688
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +31.8% +0.8%
Institutions buying 559 213 799
Institutions selling 347 50 657
Buyers to sellers 1.61 4.26 1.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RFUWMCTFC
RF 1.00 0.23 0.87
UWMC 0.23 1.00 0.20
TFC 0.87 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RF, UWMC and TFC?

Truist Financial (TFC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Regions Financial (RF) $24.62B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $511.35M, Truist Financial (TFC) $59.61B.

Which stock is cheaper, RF, UWMC and TFC?

Regions Financial (RF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Regions Financial (RF) 11.4x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -13.8x, Truist Financial (TFC) 12.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Regions Financial (RF) 10.1x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 7.9x, Truist Financial (TFC) 11.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Truist Financial (TFC) -3.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest net margin (Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Truist Financial (TFC) 25.1%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Truist Financial (TFC) 10.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Regions Financial (RF) returned the most: Regions Financial (RF) +17.1%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -74.1%, Truist Financial (TFC) +9.3%. Over five years, Regions Financial (RF) compounded fastest (Regions Financial (RF) +3.7%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.0%/yr, Truist Financial (TFC) -5.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Truist Financial (TFC) has the highest dividend yield: Regions Financial (RF) 0.04%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%, Truist Financial (TFC) 0.04%. UWM Holdings (UWMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Regions Financial (RF) has been the steadiest (Regions Financial (RF) 23.3%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.2%, Truist Financial (TFC) 23.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RF, UWMC and TFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Regions Financial (RF) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.