RF vs UWMC vs CFG Stock Comparison

Regions Financial, UWM Holdings and Citizens Financial Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KEY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.41 +4.3% 1M +17.1% 1Y
Market cap
$24.20B
P/E
11.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
3.89%
Regional Banks Financial Services
6 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.51 +20.8% 1M -74.1% 1Y
Market cap
$2.42B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
19.87%
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Regions Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Regions Financial 6, Citizens Financial 3, UWM Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRFUWMCCFGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.20B $2.42B $27.50B CFG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.3x -13.7x 12.9x RF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.1x 7.9x 12.0x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.4% +26.1% +10.6% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 28.2% -1.0% 23.8% RF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.6% 6.3% 12.0% RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 10.6x 2.6x RF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.89% 19.87% 2.82% UWMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.1% -74.1% +27.2% CFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.7%/yr -26.0%/yr +6.6%/yr CFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.3% 80.2% 25.2% RF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 35/100 30/100 RF

Percentile Scorecard

RFUWMCCFG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRFUWMCCFG
Valuation 22 #281 of 361 20 #136 of 169 19 #293 of 361
Growth 9 #157 of 172 16 #137 of 162 19 #139 of 172
Profitability 47 #80 of 149 30 #105 of 149 28 #108 of 149
Financial Health 54 #74 of 158 17 #132 of 158 29 #113 of 158
Shareholder Returns 64 #122 of 338 94 #9 of 136 54 #157 of 338
Overall 39 35 30
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • CFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRFUWMCCFGSPY
1 month +4.3%+20.8%+0.8% +0.9%
3 months -8.1%-24.1%-8.5% +5.9%
6 months +1.4%-56.5%+1.4% +8.5%
Year to date +4.8%-65.5%+11.8% +13.3%
1 year +17.1%-74.1%+27.2% +12.4%
3 years +102.8%-69.7%+185.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +26.6%-32.9%+41.9% +23.5%
5 years +20.0%-77.8%+37.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year +3.7%-26.0%+6.6% +11.0%
10 years +166.8%—+147.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year +10.3%—+9.5% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureRFUWMCCFGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.3%80.2%25.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.5%89.8%25.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.651.470.87 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.73-0.921.08 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.9%-89.5%-59.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.3%-75.2%-12.6% -0.9%
52-week high $32.40$6.10$74.73 $779.14
52-week low $24.07$1.00$49.71 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRFUWMCCFG
P/E now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 12.1x -13.7xmedian 11.4x 12.9xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 3.1xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 5.1x 15.2xmedian 11.3x 6.5xmedian 5.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.5xmedian 10.8x -0.5xmedian 6.9x 25.2xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.2x 2.5xmedian 0.7x 1.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 5.17median 1.32 0.27median 0.34 2.02median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRFUWMCCFG
Revenue $7.62B $3.58B $8.93B
Net income $2.23B -$104.96M $2.27B
Free cash flow $1.67B -$4.92B $1.09B
EPS (diluted) $2.51 $-0.11 $4.99
Cash & equivalents – $498.41M –
Total debt $7.63B $19.23B $17.83B
Shares (diluted) 857.00M 337.53M 425.66M
Enterprise value $24.27B $977.21M $27.50B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRFUWMCCFG
P/E 11.3x -13.7x 12.9x
P/FCF 14.5x -0.5x 25.2x
P/Operating cash flow 13.6x -0.5x 21.9x
P/S 3.2x 0.7x 3.1x
P/B 1.3x 2.5x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 1.3x -0.6x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 6.5x 15.2x 6.5x
EV/EBIT 6.6x 17.1x 7.0x
EV/Revenue 4.2x 2.2x 5.1x
EV/FCF 19.1x -1.6x 41.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.9x -1.6x 36.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.17 0.27 2.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRFUWMCCFG
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.4% 26.1% 10.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.7% 27.3% 1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 7.5% -175.0% 33.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.1% -31.9% 3.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 15.6% -287.6% 38.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.2% -51.2% 6.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -33.7% -103.1% -55.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.7% -18.2% -30.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -30.0% -100.4% -59.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.9% -18.4% -32.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRFUWMCCFG
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 64.2% 14.6% 77.7%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 37.4% -3.2% 32.3%
Net margin 28.2% -1.0% 23.8%
FCF margin 21.9% -137.6% 12.2%
Operating cash flow margin 23.3% -135.9% 14.1%
Return on equity 11.8% -8.1% 8.8%
Return on assets 1.4% -0.6% 1.0%
Return on invested capital 14.6% 6.3% 12.0%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.2x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 46.3x 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.6% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRFUWMCCFG
Debt / assets 4.7% 33.5% 7.6%
Debt / equity 0.4x 6.1x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 10.6x 2.6x
Debt / FCF 4.6x -1.2x 16.3x
Liabilities / assets 88.3% 94.5% 89.3%
Equity / assets 11.7% 5.5% 10.7%
Interest coverage 2.5x 0.8x 1.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRFUWMCCFG
Dividend yield 3.9% 19.9% 2.8%
Net buyback yield 4.7% – 4.3%
Shareholder yield 8.6% 19.9% 7.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 41.1% – 35.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) 55.0% – 72.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.8% – 6.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.5% – -1.1%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRFUWMCCFG
Forward P/E 10.1xFY2026 7.9xFY2026 12.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.80FY2026 $0.19FY2026 $5.42FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.2%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026 +40.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.3% +26.3% +27.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.33BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026 $8.59BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.3%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.2% +37.3% +11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRFUWMCCFG
Held by institutions 84.8% 17.0% 96.7%
Institutions holding 1,105 290 1,097
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +31.8% +2.9%
Institutions buying 559 213 633
Institutions selling 347 50 314
Buyers to sellers 1.61 4.26 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RFUWMCCFG
RF 1.00 0.23 0.88
UWMC 0.23 1.00 0.24
CFG 0.88 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RF, UWMC and CFG?

Citizens Financial (CFG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Regions Financial (RF) $24.20B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $2.42B, Citizens Financial (CFG) $27.50B.

Which stock is cheaper, RF, UWMC and CFG?

Regions Financial (RF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Regions Financial (RF) 11.3x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -13.7x, Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Regions Financial (RF) 10.1x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 7.9x, Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +10.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest net margin (Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 23.8%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 12.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Citizens Financial (CFG) returned the most: Regions Financial (RF) +17.1%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -74.1%, Citizens Financial (CFG) +27.2%. Over five years, Citizens Financial (CFG) compounded fastest (Regions Financial (RF) +3.7%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.0%/yr, Citizens Financial (CFG) +6.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) has the highest dividend yield: Regions Financial (RF) 3.89%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 19.87%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 2.82%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Regions Financial (RF) has been the steadiest (Regions Financial (RF) 23.3%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.2%, Citizens Financial (CFG) 25.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RF, UWMC and CFG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Regions Financial (RF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.