RF vs TFC vs EWBC Stock Comparison

Regions Financial, Truist Financial and East West Bancorp Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (KEY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RF Regions Financial Corp
$28.41 +4.3% 1M +17.1% 1Y
Market cap
$24.62B
P/E
11.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.62B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
7 wins
TFC Truist Financial Corp
$48.44 +2.8% 1M +9.3% 1Y
Market cap
$59.61B
P/E
12.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.41B
Div. yield
0.04%
Regional Banks Financial Services
2 wins
EWBC East West Bancorp Inc
$131.28 +3.6% 1M +30.3% 1Y
Market cap
$18.26B
P/E
11.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Regional Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Regions Financial leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Regions Financial 7, East West Bancorp 3, Truist Financial 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRFTFCEWBCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.62B $59.61B $18.26B TFC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 11.4x 12.2x 11.9x RF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.1x 11.3x 11.5x RF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.4% -3.6% — RF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 28.2% 25.1% — RF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.6% 10.2% — RF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 4.1x — RF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.04% 0.04% 0.00% TFC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.1% +9.3% +30.3% EWBC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.7%/yr -5.3%/yr +10.6%/yr EWBC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.3% 23.4% 22.7% EWBC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 33/100 — RF

Percentile Scorecard

RFTFCEWBC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRFTFCEWBC
Valuation 22 #281 of 361 43 #206 of 361 40 #217 of 361
Growth 9 #157 of 172 15 #146 of 172 –
Profitability 47 #80 of 149 41 #89 of 149 –
Financial Health 54 #74 of 158 21 #125 of 158 –
Shareholder Returns 64 #122 of 338 46 #182 of 338 37 #214 of 338
Overall 39 33 –
  • RF ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • TFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • EWBC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRFTFCEWBCSPY
1 month +4.3%+2.8%+3.6% +0.9%
3 months -8.1%-7.4%+0.8% +5.9%
6 months +1.4%-4.4%+5.3% +8.5%
Year to date +4.8%-1.6%+16.8% +13.3%
1 year +17.1%+9.3%+30.3% +12.4%
3 years +102.8%+75.4%+149.4% +88.1%
3 years, per year +26.6%+20.6%+35.6% +23.5%
5 years +20.0%-23.7%+65.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year +3.7%-5.3%+10.6% +11.0%
10 years +166.8%+23.7%+233.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year +10.3%+2.2%+12.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureRFTFCEWBCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.3%23.4%22.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.5%26.2%22.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.650.590.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.730.401.33 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.9%-61.1%-55.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.3%-13.2%-3.9% -0.9%
52-week high $32.40$55.81$136.60 $779.14
52-week low $24.07$43.73$99.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRFTFCEWBC
P/E now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 12.1x 12.0xmedian 12.1x 11.9xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.4x 3.0xmedian 3.4x 5.5xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.5xmedian 5.1x 7.7xmedian 5.1x —median 5.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.5xmedian 10.8x 9.6xmedian 10.8x 9.2xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.2x 0.9xmedian 1.2x —median 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 5.17median 1.32 -781.84median 1.32 —median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRFTFCEWBC
Revenue $7.62B $19.41B –
Net income $2.23B $5.19B –
Free cash flow $1.67B $6.06B –
EPS (diluted) $2.51 $3.97 –
Total debt $7.63B $65.79B –
Shares (diluted) 857.00M 1.23B 138.30M
Enterprise value $24.62B $59.61B $18.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRFTFCEWBC
P/E 11.3x 12.0x 11.9x
P/FCF 14.5x 9.6x 9.2x
P/Operating cash flow 13.6x 9.6x –
P/S 3.2x 3.0x 5.5x
P/B 1.3x 0.9x –
P/Tangible book 1.3x 1.0x –
EV/EBITDA 6.5x 7.7x –
EV/EBIT 6.6x 8.1x –
EV/Revenue 4.2x 6.4x –
EV/FCF 19.1x 20.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow 17.9x 20.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.17 -781.84 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRFTFCEWBC
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.4% -3.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.7% 2.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 7.5% -0.8% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.1% -3.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 15.6% 5.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.2% 0.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -33.7% 54.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.7% -14.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -30.0% 54.2% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.9% -14.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRFTFCEWBC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 64.2% 83.0% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 37.4% 30.7% –
Net margin 28.2% 25.1% –
FCF margin 21.9% 31.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 23.3% 31.2% –
Return on equity 11.8% 8.3% –
Return on assets 1.4% 0.9% –
Return on invested capital 14.6% 10.2% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 1.2x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRFTFCEWBC
Debt / assets 4.7% 11.9% –
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.6x 4.1x –
Debt / FCF 4.6x 10.9x –
Liabilities / assets 88.3% 88.9% 89.5%
Equity / assets 11.7% 11.1% –
Interest coverage 2.5x 1.6x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRFTFCEWBC
Dividend yield 3.9% 4.3% 2.3%
Net buyback yield 4.7% 7.4% –
Shareholder yield 8.6% 11.7% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 41.1% 49.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 55.0% 42.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.8% -4.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 8.5% -2.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRFTFCEWBC
Forward P/E 10.1xFY2026 11.3xFY2026 11.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.80FY2026 $4.28FY2026 $11.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +20.2%FY2026 +12.0%FY2026 +20.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -4.3% +18.0% -2.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.33BFY2026 $19.70BFY2026 $3.02BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -3.3%FY2026 -4.0%FY2026 +2.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +16.2% +1.3% +22.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRFTFCEWBC
Held by institutions 84.8% 76.7% 92.0%
Institutions holding 1,105 1,688 648
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.9% +0.8% +1.4%
Institutions buying 559 799 352
Institutions selling 347 657 199
Buyers to sellers 1.61 1.22 1.77

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RFTFCEWBC
RF 1.00 0.87 0.77
TFC 0.87 1.00 0.76
EWBC 0.77 0.76 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RF, TFC and EWBC?

Truist Financial (TFC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Regions Financial (RF) $24.62B, Truist Financial (TFC) $59.61B, East West Bancorp (EWBC) $18.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, RF, TFC and EWBC?

Regions Financial (RF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Regions Financial (RF) 11.4x, Truist Financial (TFC) 12.2x, East West Bancorp (EWBC) 11.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Regions Financial (RF) is cheapest (Regions Financial (RF) 10.1x, Truist Financial (TFC) 11.3x, East West Bancorp (EWBC) 11.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Regions Financial (RF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Regions Financial (RF) +4.4%, Truist Financial (TFC) -3.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Regions Financial (RF) has the highest net margin (Regions Financial (RF) 28.2%, Truist Financial (TFC) 25.1%). On return on invested capital, Regions Financial (RF) leads (Regions Financial (RF) 14.6%, Truist Financial (TFC) 10.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year East West Bancorp (EWBC) returned the most: Regions Financial (RF) +17.1%, Truist Financial (TFC) +9.3%, East West Bancorp (EWBC) +30.3%. Over five years, East West Bancorp (EWBC) compounded fastest (Regions Financial (RF) +3.7%/yr, Truist Financial (TFC) -5.3%/yr, East West Bancorp (EWBC) +10.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Truist Financial (TFC) has the highest dividend yield: Regions Financial (RF) 0.04%, Truist Financial (TFC) 0.04%, East West Bancorp (EWBC) 0.00%. East West Bancorp (EWBC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, East West Bancorp (EWBC) has been the steadiest (Regions Financial (RF) 23.3%, Truist Financial (TFC) 23.4%, East West Bancorp (EWBC) 22.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RF, TFC and EWBC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Regions Financial (RF) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.