REBN vs TFII vs YUMC Stock Comparison

Reborn Coffee, TFI International and Yum China Holdings Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
REBN Reborn Coffee, Inc.
$1.28 -39.0% 1M -27.3% 1Y
Market cap
$10.51M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$16.10M
Div. yield
–
Quick-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.
$49.76 +22.5% 1M +13.4% 1Y
Market cap
$17.17B
P/E
17.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.44B
Div. yield
2.23%
Quick-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
8 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Yum China Holdings leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Yum China Holdings 8, Reborn Coffee 3, TFI International 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionREBNTFIIYUMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $10.51M $8.16B $17.17B YUMC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.7x 19.0x 17.8x YUMC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 0.6x 17.8x 16.4x REBN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +145.2% +4.2% +8.8% REBN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -37.6% 5.0% 7.8% YUMC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -32.4% 17.7% 16.5% TFII
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.3x 0.0x -0.7x REBN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.94% 2.23% YUMC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -27.3% +8.8% +13.4% YUMC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -3.3%/yr -2.7%/yr YUMC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 108.8% 41.1% 25.9% YUMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 62/100 74/100 YUMC

Percentile Scorecard

REBNTFIIYUMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisREBNTFIIYUMC
Valuation 0 #50 of 50 68 #44 of 137 69 #16 of 50
Growth 75 #13 of 48 34 #84 of 127 49 #25 of 48
Profitability 0 #47 of 47 65 #44 of 125 67 #16 of 47
Financial Health 6 #48 of 51 62 #56 of 147 88 #7 of 51
Shareholder Returns – 78 #21 of 90 94 #3 of 33
Overall 20 62 74
  • REBN ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • TFII ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • YUMC ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodREBNTFIIYUMCSPY
1 month -39.0%-15.1%+22.5% -5.9%
3 months -4.5%-29.7%+3.2% -4.6%
6 months -47.8%-30.1%+3.4% +0.2%
Year to date -14.1%-6.4%+4.2% +7.5%
1 year -27.3%+8.8%+13.4% +8.2%
3 years -53.1%-14.4%+10.7% +68.3%
3 years, per year -22.3%-5.0%+3.4% +19.0%
5 years —-15.5%-12.7% +56.5%
5 years, per year —-3.3%-2.7% +9.4%
10 years —+328.8%+80.4% +251.5%
10 years, per year —+15.7%+6.1% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureREBNTFIIYUMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 108.8%41.1%25.9% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 104.7%45.7%24.2% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.711.170.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.250.210.52 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.2%-54.5%-54.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.2%-40.8%-14.1% -5.9%
52-week high $2.86$163.36$57.95 $779.14
52-week low $0.70$80.71$39.98 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleREBNTFIIYUMC
P/E now vs peer median -1.7xmedian 22.0x 19.0xmedian 14.1x 17.8xmedian 22.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 1.1x 1.0xmedian 0.9x 1.4xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -11.6xmedian 13.5x 7.9xmedian 7.8x 8.6xmedian 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.1xmedian 18.3x 6.7xmedian 11.7x 18.3xmedian 18.3x
P/B now vs peer median 14.3xmedian 3.0x 2.9xmedian 1.2x 2.8xmedian 3.0x
PEG now vs peer median -0.05median 0.89 -3.63median 0.68 1.07median 0.89

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsREBNTFIIYUMC
Revenue $16.10M $8.39B $12.44B
Gross profit $7.08M – $2.14B
Operating income -$2.14M $624.12M $1.38B
Net income -$5.81M $356.83M $1.05B
Free cash flow -$5.09M $1.21B $940.00M
EPS (diluted) $-0.74 $5.07 $2.79
Cash & equivalents $309.88K $187.49M $485.00M
Total debt $4.58M $186.52M $66.00M
Shares (diluted) 8.21M 83.41M 349.00M
Enterprise value $7.67M $7.37B $11.53B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricREBNTFIIYUMC
P/E -1.7x 19.0x 17.8x
P/FCF -2.1x 6.7x 18.3x
P/Operating cash flow -2.1x 9.1x 10.9x
P/S 0.7x 1.0x 1.4x
P/B 14.3x 2.9x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 14.3x -4.3x 2.9x
EV/EBITDA -11.6x 7.9x 8.6x
EV/EBIT -6.9x 13.1x 11.5x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 1.0x 1.3x
EV/FCF -2.9x 6.7x 16.9x
EV/Operating cash flow -3.0x 9.1x 10.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.05 -3.63 1.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricREBNTFIIYUMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 145.2% 4.2% 8.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 54.8% 3.7% 6.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 9.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.0% – 5.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 74.9% 4.3% 12.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.1% -7.0% 10.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 42.0% 9.1% 6.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -10.5% -12.2% 9.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 65.9% 14.5% 13.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 34.4% -5.2% 16.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -34.3% -6.6% 9.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.6% -2.3% -3.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -21.3% -0.9% 12.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.2% -3.6% -4.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricREBNTFIIYUMC
Gross margin 44.0% – 17.2%
EBITDA margin -7.9% 12.4% 14.9%
Operating margin -13.3% 7.4% 11.1%
Pretax margin -33.6% 7.8% 11.5%
Net margin -37.6% 5.0% 7.8%
FCF margin -31.6% 14.4% 7.6%
Operating cash flow margin -31.1% 10.7% 12.7%
Return on equity -271.8% 12.9% 17.3%
Return on assets -43.8% 4.8% 9.7%
Return on invested capital -32.4% 17.7% 16.5%
Return on capital employed -57.8% 10.0% 16.4%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.1x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 2.5x 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 5.5% 0.2% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricREBNTFIIYUMC
Debt / assets 38.8% 2.5% 0.6%
Debt / equity 6.2x 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -3.3x 0.0x -0.7x
Debt / FCF -0.9x 0.2x 0.1x
Liabilities / assets 93.8% 62.6% 44.2%
Equity / assets 6.2% 37.4% 55.8%
Interest coverage -3.4x 3.7x –
Current ratio 0.7x 1.1x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 0.6x
Altman Z-score -3.16 2.81 3.91

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricREBNTFIIYUMC
Dividend yield – 1.9% 2.2%
Net buyback yield – 5.3% 7.6%
Shareholder yield – 7.2% 9.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 35.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 40.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 24.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 21.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusREBNTFIIYUMC
Forward P/E 0.6xFY2026 17.8xFY2026 16.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.07FY2026 $5.43FY2026 $3.04FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +24.3%FY2026 +21.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -72.0% +33.0% +15.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $35.97MFY2026 $8.43BFY2026 $12.36BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +344.4%FY2026 +7.0%FY2026 +4.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.0% -0.5% +6.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersREBNTFIIYUMC
Held by institutions – 69.4% 66.8%
Institutions holding – 296 661
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.2% +1.4%
Institutions buying – 175 261
Institutions selling – 90 231
Buyers to sellers – 1.94 1.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

REBNTFIIYUMC
REBN 1.00 0.03 -0.03
TFII 0.03 1.00 0.07
YUMC -0.03 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, REBN, TFII and YUMC?

Yum China Holdings (YUMC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Reborn Coffee (REBN) $10.51M, TFI International (TFII) $8.16B, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) $17.17B.

Which stock is cheaper, REBN, TFII and YUMC?

Yum China Holdings (YUMC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Reborn Coffee (REBN) -1.7x, TFI International (TFII) 19.0x, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) 17.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Reborn Coffee (REBN) is cheapest (Reborn Coffee (REBN) 0.6x, TFI International (TFII) 17.8x, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) 16.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Reborn Coffee (REBN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Reborn Coffee (REBN) +145.2%, TFI International (TFII) +4.2%, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) +8.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Yum China Holdings (YUMC) has the highest net margin (Reborn Coffee (REBN) -37.6%, TFI International (TFII) 5.0%, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) 7.8%). On return on invested capital, TFI International (TFII) leads (Reborn Coffee (REBN) -32.4%, TFI International (TFII) 17.7%, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) 16.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Yum China Holdings (YUMC) returned the most: Reborn Coffee (REBN) -27.3%, TFI International (TFII) +8.8%, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) +13.4%. Over five years, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) compounded fastest (TFI International (TFII) -3.3%/yr, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) -2.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Yum China Holdings (YUMC) has the highest dividend yield: TFI International (TFII) 1.94%, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) 2.23%. Reborn Coffee (REBN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) has been the steadiest (Reborn Coffee (REBN) 108.8%, TFI International (TFII) 41.1%, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) 25.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, REBN, TFII and YUMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Yum China Holdings (YUMC) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.