RAL vs ASML vs EMR Stock Comparison

Ralliant, Asml Holding and Emerson Electric Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FORM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RAL Ralliant Corp
$69.69 -0.5% 1M +60.0% 1Y
Market cap
$7.71B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.19B
Div. yield
0.29%
Test and Measurement Technology
3 wins
ASML Asml Holding Nv
$1,635.57 -6.2% 1M +54.3% 1Y
Market cap
$630.38B
P/E
58.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.62B
Div. yield
0.68%
Semiconductor Equipment Technology
5 wins
EMR Emerson Electric Co
$166.25 +5.2% 1M +23.6% 1Y
Market cap
$92.73B
P/E
36.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.64B
Div. yield
1.34%
Pumps and Valves Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Asml Holding leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Asml Holding 5, Emerson Electric 4, Ralliant 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionRALASMLEMRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.71B $630.38B $92.73B ASML
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.3x 58.1x 36.0x EMR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.8x 34.3x 24.6x RAL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.9% +22.9% +4.8% ASML
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -56.4% 29.1% 13.8% ASML
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -43.2% — 10.9% EMR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.8x — 1.8x RAL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.29% 0.68% 1.34% EMR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +60.0% +54.3% +23.6% RAL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +15.0%/yr +11.3%/yr ASML
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 55.0% 46.8% 31.8% EMR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 28/100 47/100 45/100 ASML

Percentile Scorecard

RALASMLEMR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisRALASMLEMR
Valuation 32 #77 of 112 18 #77 of 94 34 #134 of 203
Growth 4 #105 of 109 82 #17 of 92 40 #114 of 188
Profitability 24 #79 of 104 79 #20 of 90 86 #26 of 183
Financial Health 20 #93 of 116 13 #86 of 99 29 #154 of 217
Shareholder Returns 59 #34 of 81 42 #43 of 73 36 #99 of 153
Overall 28 47 45
  • RAL ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • ASML ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • EMR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodRALASMLEMRSPY
1 month -0.5%-6.2%+5.2% -0.2%
3 months +2.9%+3.3%+9.5% +3.9%
6 months +59.1%+18.1%+20.1% +8.2%
Year to date +36.9%+52.9%+25.3% +12.9%
1 year +60.0%+54.3%+23.6% +12.3%
3 years —+177.2%+88.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+40.5%+23.6% +23.3%
5 years —+101.1%+70.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+15.0%+11.3% +10.9%
10 years —+1,471.9%+233.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+31.7%+12.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureRALASMLEMRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 55.0%46.8%31.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 64.0%46.4%33.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.712.271.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.091.160.74 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -31.8%-56.9%-29.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.9%-17.8%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $74.04$1,989.44$166.25 $779.14
52-week low $38.39$966.57$123.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleRALASMLEMR
P/E now vs peer median -6.3xmedian 33.2x 58.1xmedian 45.6x 36.0xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 3.5xmedian 2.8x 16.8xmedian 7.7x 5.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -8.2xmedian 20.0x —median 29.0x 16.8xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.5xmedian 29.8x 50.3xmedian 40.6x 26.8xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 3.0x 27.4xmedian 4.6x 4.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.17 2.40median 2.28 -0.87median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsRALASMLEMR
Revenue $2.19B $37.62B $18.64B
Gross profit $1.11B $19.58B $9.91B
Operating income -$1.17B – $4.68B
Net income -$1.23B – $2.58B
Free cash flow $327.70M – $3.46B
R&D $170.10M – –
EPS (diluted) $-10.95 $28.13 $4.59
Cash & equivalents $270.90M $15.17B $2.18B
Total debt $1.15B $5.16B $13.11B
Shares (diluted) 112.60M 388.90M 561.10M
Enterprise value $6.59B $586.07B $85.49B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricRALASMLEMR
P/E -6.3x 58.1x 36.0x
P/FCF 23.5x 50.3x 26.8x
P/Operating cash flow 21.1x – 23.7x
P/S 3.5x 16.8x 5.0x
P/B 5.0x 27.4x 4.5x
P/Tangible book 9.7x 28.1x 7.9x
EV/EBITDA -8.2x – 16.8x
EV/EBIT -7.4x – 22.2x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 16.5x 5.6x
EV/FCF 26.2x – 29.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 23.5x – 26.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.40 -0.87

Growth

14 metrics
MetricRALASMLEMR
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.9% 22.9% 4.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 19.4% 7.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% 24.9% 5.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 20.6% 11.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -436.8% – 9.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 13.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -532.3% – -3.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -42.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -532.7% 35.2% -2.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 24.2% -41.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -20.1% – 4.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 10.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -21.7% – 4.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 9.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricRALASMLEMR
Gross margin 50.9% 52.0% 53.2%
EBITDA margin -47.8% – 33.1%
Operating margin -53.3% – 25.1%
Pretax margin -56.1% – 17.6%
Net margin -56.4% 29.1% 13.8%
FCF margin 15.0% – 18.6%
Operating cash flow margin 16.7% – 21.0%
Return on equity -79.5% – 12.7%
Return on assets -33.3% – 6.1%
Return on invested capital -43.2% – 10.9%
Return on capital employed -38.0% – 14.9%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.3x – 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 3.0% – 1.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricRALASMLEMR
Debt / assets 31.0% 8.7% 31.1%
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.2x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.8x – 1.8x
Debt / FCF 3.5x – 3.8x
Liabilities / assets 58.6% 61.2% 51.7%
Equity / assets 41.4% 38.8% 48.3%
Interest coverage -19.2x – –
Current ratio 1.5x 1.3x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.7x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.5x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.32 – 4.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricRALASMLEMR
Dividend yield 0.3% 0.7% 1.3%
Net buyback yield 2.0% – 1.0%
Shareholder yield 2.3% 0.7% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 47.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 35.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 3.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 0.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusRALASMLEMR
Forward P/E 22.8xFY2026 34.3xFY2026 24.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.06FY2026 $47.62FY2026 $6.75FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.8%FY2026 +61.2%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +14.1% +42.0% +15.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.45BFY2026 $47.18BFY2026 $18.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.5%FY2026 +20.9%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.8% +42.9% +15.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersRALASMLEMR
Held by institutions 100.0% 19.8% 82.1%
Institutions holding 533 2,492 2,290
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.7% +8.0% +0.9%
Institutions buying 251 1,359 1,080
Institutions selling 165 782 798
Buyers to sellers 1.52 1.74 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

RALASMLEMR
RAL 1.00 0.30 0.42
ASML 0.30 1.00 0.52
EMR 0.42 0.52 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, RAL, ASML and EMR?

Asml Holding (ASML) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ralliant (RAL) $7.71B, Asml Holding (ASML) $630.38B, Emerson Electric (EMR) $92.73B.

Which stock is cheaper, RAL, ASML and EMR?

Emerson Electric (EMR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ralliant (RAL) -6.3x, Asml Holding (ASML) 58.1x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 36.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ralliant (RAL) is cheapest (Ralliant (RAL) 22.8x, Asml Holding (ASML) 34.3x, Emerson Electric (EMR) 24.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Asml Holding (ASML) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ralliant (RAL) +5.9%, Asml Holding (ASML) +22.9%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +4.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Asml Holding (ASML) has the highest net margin (Ralliant (RAL) -56.4%, Asml Holding (ASML) 29.1%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 13.8%). On return on invested capital, Emerson Electric (EMR) leads (Ralliant (RAL) -43.2%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 10.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ralliant (RAL) returned the most: Ralliant (RAL) +60.0%, Asml Holding (ASML) +54.3%, Emerson Electric (EMR) +23.6%. Over five years, Asml Holding (ASML) compounded fastest (Asml Holding (ASML) +15.0%/yr, Emerson Electric (EMR) +11.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Emerson Electric (EMR) has the highest dividend yield: Ralliant (RAL) 0.29%, Asml Holding (ASML) 0.68%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 1.34%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Emerson Electric (EMR) has been the steadiest (Ralliant (RAL) 55.0%, Asml Holding (ASML) 46.8%, Emerson Electric (EMR) 31.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, RAL, ASML and EMR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Asml Holding (ASML) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.