QCOM vs SNPS vs MPWR Stock Comparison

Qualcomm, Synopsys and Monolithic Power Systems Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ARM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
QCOM Qualcomm Inc/De
$185.41 +0.7% 1M +3.8% 1Y
Market cap
$195.98B
P/E
21.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$44.07B
Div. yield
1.95%
Semiconductor Design Technology
7 wins
SNPS Synopsys Inc
$490.19 +18.1% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$93.92B
P/E
72.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.88B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Qualcomm leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Qualcomm 7, Monolithic Power Systems 4, Synopsys 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionQCOMSNPSMPWRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $195.98B $93.92B $58.91B QCOM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.2x 72.1x 65.9x QCOM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.2x 33.7x 45.5x QCOM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.9% +38.0% +40.5% MPWR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.0% 14.7% — QCOM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.5% 1.8% — QCOM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 2.8x — QCOM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.95% — 0.63% QCOM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +3.8% +7.7% +9.6% MPWR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.9%/yr +8.0%/yr +17.9%/yr MPWR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.9% 44.8% 54.9% SNPS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 37/100 62/100 MPWR

Percentile Scorecard

QCOMSNPSMPWR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisQCOMSNPSMPWR
Valuation 79 #21 of 94 40 #57 of 94 17 #78 of 94
Growth 33 #62 of 92 47 #49 of 92 84 #16 of 92
Profitability 86 #13 of 88 43 #51 of 88 98 #3 of 88
Financial Health 30 #68 of 96 18 #79 of 96 73 #27 of 96
Shareholder Returns 78 #17 of 72 – 41 #43 of 72
Overall 61 37 62
  • QCOM ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • SNPS ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • MPWR ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodQCOMSNPSMPWRSPY
1 month +0.7%+18.1%-11.6% +0.7%
3 months +22.3%+31.7%-8.9% +3.7%
6 months +3.2%+1.6%-25.7% +7.1%
Year to date +8.4%+4.4%+32.3% +12.8%
1 year +3.8%+7.7%+9.6% +11.9%
3 years +71.9%+6.3%+196.7% +85.2%
3 years, per year +19.8%+2.1%+43.7% +22.8%
5 years +39.4%+47.1%+128.1% +67.6%
5 years, per year +6.9%+8.0%+17.9% +10.9%
10 years +171.1%+739.8%+1,437.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +10.5%+23.7%+31.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureQCOMSNPSMPWRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.9%44.8%54.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.4%42.9%58.8% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.071.682.58 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.070.170.17 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -45.6%-42.3%-51.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.1%-8.3%-29.1% -1.2%
52-week high $251.02$534.56$1,689.89 $779.14
52-week low $124.07$372.33$856.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleQCOMSNPSMPWR
P/E now vs peer median 21.2xmedian 46.4x 72.1xmedian 46.4x 65.9xmedian 46.4x
P/S now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 7.8x 10.6xmedian 7.8x 15.8xmedian 7.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.0xmedian 27.5x 43.4xmedian 27.5x —median 27.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.8xmedian 40.1x —median 40.1x 114.4xmedian 40.1x
P/B now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 4.7x 3.0xmedian 4.7x 15.8xmedian 4.7x
PEG now vs peer median 5.09median 2.10 152.27median 2.10 2.60median 2.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsQCOMSNPSMPWR
Revenue $44.07B $8.88B $3.74B
Gross profit $23.90B $6.53B $2.07B
Operating income $10.22B $847.20M $1.10B
Net income $9.26B $1.30B –
Free cash flow $10.42B – –
R&D $9.89B $2.81B $455.36M
EPS (diluted) $8.66 $6.77 $18.13
Cash & equivalents $4.53B $3.61B $560.54M
Total debt $12.78B $10.04B –
Shares (diluted) 1.07B 192.32M 49.26M
Enterprise value $155.90B $90.31B $58.91B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricQCOMSNPSMPWR
P/E 21.2x 72.1x 65.9x
P/FCF 18.8x – 114.4x
P/Operating cash flow 15.8x – –
P/S 4.4x 10.6x 15.8x
P/B 7.1x 3.0x 15.8x
P/Tangible book 7.5x 4.8x 15.8x
EV/EBITDA 17.0x 43.4x –
EV/EBIT 19.6x 118.5x –
EV/Revenue 4.5x 11.3x 15.8x
EV/FCF 19.2x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 16.2x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.09 152.27 2.60

Growth

14 metrics
MetricQCOMSNPSMPWR
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.9% 38.0% 40.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.5% 22.8% 27.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.8% 28.2% 40.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.2% 18.9% 25.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -15.0% -23.3% 59.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.6% -7.0% 29.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -20.0% -34.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.4% 8.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) -17.8% -45.2% -48.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 4.2% 0.5% 25.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.1% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -10.4% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.9% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricQCOMSNPSMPWR
Gross margin 54.2% 73.5% –
EBITDA margin 26.8% 26.0% –
Operating margin 23.2% 9.5% –
Pretax margin 25.4% 16.5% –
Net margin 21.0% 14.7% –
FCF margin 23.6% – –
Operating cash flow margin 28.1% – –
Return on equity 33.7% 4.2% 23.4%
Return on assets 16.2% 2.7% 19.1%
Return on invested capital 20.5% 1.8% –
Return on capital employed 22.3% 2.0% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.2x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x – –
Stock comp / revenue 7.4% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricQCOMSNPSMPWR
Debt / assets 22.3% 21.0% –
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 2.8x –
Debt / FCF 1.2x – –
Liabilities / assets 51.8% 34.7% 20.1%
Equity / assets 48.2% 65.3% 79.9%
Interest coverage 14.8x 1.3x –
Current ratio 2.0x 1.3x 3.7x
Quick ratio 1.1x 1.0x –
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.7x –
Altman Z-score 6.22 4.01 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricQCOMSNPSMPWR
Dividend yield 2.0% – 0.6%
Net buyback yield 4.5% – –
Shareholder yield 6.5% – 0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 41.3% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 36.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusQCOMSNPSMPWR
Forward P/E 17.2xFY2026 33.7xFY2026 45.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.79FY2026 $14.56FY2026 $26.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -10.3%FY2026 +12.8%FY2026 +48.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.0% +21.4% +41.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $45.55BFY2026 $10.20BFY2026 $4.27BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 +44.6%FY2026 +53.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.0% +12.8% +34.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersQCOMSNPSMPWR
Held by institutions 79.7% 92.3% 96.9%
Institutions holding 3,032 1,442 1,247
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +5.6% +3.2%
Institutions buying 1,417 773 642
Institutions selling 1,334 494 459
Buyers to sellers 1.06 1.56 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

QCOMSNPSMPWR
QCOM 1.00 0.30 0.45
SNPS 0.30 1.00 0.34
MPWR 0.45 0.34 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, QCOM, SNPS and MPWR?

Qualcomm (QCOM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Qualcomm (QCOM) $195.98B, Synopsys (SNPS) $93.92B, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) $58.91B.

Which stock is cheaper, QCOM, SNPS and MPWR?

Qualcomm (QCOM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.2x, Synopsys (SNPS) 72.1x, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 65.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Qualcomm (QCOM) is cheapest (Qualcomm (QCOM) 17.2x, Synopsys (SNPS) 33.7x, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 45.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.9%, Synopsys (SNPS) +38.0%, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) +40.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Qualcomm (QCOM) has the highest net margin (Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.0%, Synopsys (SNPS) 14.7%). On return on invested capital, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads (Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.5%, Synopsys (SNPS) 1.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) returned the most: Qualcomm (QCOM) +3.8%, Synopsys (SNPS) +7.7%, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) +9.6%. Over five years, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) compounded fastest (Qualcomm (QCOM) +6.9%/yr, Synopsys (SNPS) +8.0%/yr, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) +17.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Qualcomm (QCOM) has the highest dividend yield: Qualcomm (QCOM) 1.95%, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 0.63%. Synopsys (SNPS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Synopsys (SNPS) has been the steadiest (Qualcomm (QCOM) 52.9%, Synopsys (SNPS) 44.8%, Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) 54.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, QCOM, SNPS and MPWR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.