QCOM vs NVDA vs MRVL Stock Comparison

Qualcomm, Nvidia and Marvell Technology Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LSCC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
QCOM Qualcomm Inc/De
$184.17 -8.8% 1M -1.9% 1Y
Market cap
$192.69B
P/E
20.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$44.07B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor Design Technology
2 wins
NVDA Nvidia Corp
$217.94 -3.2% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$5.21T
P/E
27.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$302.97B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
8 wins
MRVL Marvell Technology, Inc.
$243.57 -7.0% 1M +174.6% 1Y
Market cap
$224.88B
P/E
85.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.45B
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor Design Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Nvidia leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Nvidia 8, Qualcomm 2, Marvell Technology 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionQCOMNVDAMRVLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $192.69B $5.21T $224.88B NVDA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 20.8x 27.0x 85.2x QCOM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.1x 24.9x 59.1x QCOM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +1.9% +83.4% +30.6% NVDA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.0% 63.7% 27.9% NVDA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.5% 71.1% 5.8% NVDA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x -0.2x 0.4x NVDA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.9% +13.8% +174.6% MRVL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +6.6%/yr +54.3%/yr +28.9%/yr NVDA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.0% 37.7% 79.1% NVDA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 74/100 51/100 NVDA

Percentile Scorecard

QCOMNVDAMRVL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisQCOMNVDAMRVL
Valuation 80 #20 of 94 58 #40 of 94 29 #67 of 94
Growth 33 #62 of 92 97 #4 of 92 90 #10 of 92
Profitability 85 #14 of 90 99 #2 of 90 61 #36 of 90
Financial Health 28 #72 of 99 65 #35 of 99 47 #53 of 99
Shareholder Returns 79 #16 of 73 49 #38 of 73 26 #54 of 73
Overall 61 74 51
  • QCOM ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • NVDA ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • MRVL ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodQCOMNVDAMRVLSPY
1 month -8.8%-3.2%-7.0% -0.2%
3 months +13.1%+10.6%+39.6% +3.9%
6 months +22.8%+2.2%+59.0% +8.2%
Year to date +7.7%+16.9%+186.6% +12.9%
1 year -1.9%+13.8%+174.6% +12.3%
3 years +73.0%+438.1%+415.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year +20.1%+75.3%+72.8% +23.3%
5 years +37.8%+773.8%+255.7% +67.9%
5 years, per year +6.6%+54.3%+28.9% +10.9%
10 years +162.8%+12,233.9%+1,756.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.1%+61.9%+33.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureQCOMNVDAMRVLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.0%37.7%79.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.5%36.6%74.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.071.943.23 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.040.372.21 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -45.6%-66.4%-62.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.6%-8.9%-23.0% -1.2%
52-week high $251.02$239.24$316.43 $779.14
52-week low $124.07$165.17$73.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleQCOMNVDAMRVL
P/E now vs peer median 21.0xmedian 45.6x 27.3xmedian 45.6x 82.8xmedian 45.6x
P/S now vs peer median 4.4xmedian 7.7x 17.3xmedian 7.7x 22.6xmedian 7.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.9xmedian 29.0x 25.9xmedian 29.0x 76.0xmedian 29.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.7xmedian 40.6x 41.4xmedian 40.6x 123.5xmedian 40.6x
P/B now vs peer median 7.0xmedian 4.6x 22.9xmedian 4.6x 11.5xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median 5.05median 2.28 0.16median 2.28 0.79median 2.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsQCOMNVDAMRVL
Revenue $44.07B $302.97B $9.45B
Gross profit $23.90B $226.24B $4.93B
Operating income $10.22B $197.58B $1.56B
Net income $9.26B $192.88B $2.64B
Free cash flow $10.42B $127.01B $1.73B
R&D $9.89B $23.59B $2.44B
EPS (diluted) $8.66 $7.94 $2.87
Cash & equivalents $4.53B $22.44B $3.93B
Total debt $12.78B $33.37B $4.96B
Shares (diluted) 1.07B 24.29B 921.20M
Enterprise value $152.61B $4.98T $211.75B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricQCOMNVDAMRVL
P/E 21.0x 27.3x 82.8x
P/FCF 18.7x 41.4x 123.5x
P/Operating cash flow 15.7x 39.1x 97.1x
P/S 4.4x 17.3x 22.6x
P/B 7.0x 22.9x 11.5x
P/Tangible book 7.4x 23.2x 13.2x
EV/EBITDA 16.9x 25.9x 76.0x
EV/EBIT 19.5x 26.4x 137.5x
EV/Revenue 4.5x 17.2x 22.7x
EV/FCF 19.1x 41.1x 124.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.1x 38.9x 97.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 5.05 0.16 0.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricQCOMNVDAMRVL
Revenue growth (1Y) 1.9% 83.4% 30.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.5% 110.1% 18.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.8% 96.0% 52.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.2% 120.4% 25.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -15.0% 105.9% 1,577%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.6% 163.5% 100.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -20.0% 122.7% 2,653%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.4% 165.3% 107.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -17.8% 125.0% 2,512%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 4.2% 167.9% 104.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -2.1% 74.4% 19.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.7% 124.3% 26.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -10.4% 76.3% 12.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 130.9% 30.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricQCOMNVDAMRVL
Gross margin 54.2% 74.7% 52.2%
EBITDA margin 26.8% 66.4% 29.9%
Operating margin 23.2% 65.2% 16.5%
Pretax margin 25.4% 75.8% 32.4%
Net margin 21.0% 63.7% 27.9%
FCF margin 23.6% 41.9% 18.3%
Operating cash flow margin 28.1% 44.3% 23.3%
Return on equity 33.7% 90.9% 14.4%
Return on assets 16.2% 66.5% 9.7%
Return on invested capital 20.5% 71.1% 5.8%
Return on capital employed 22.3% 80.0% 6.3%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.0x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 0.7x 0.8x
Stock comp / revenue 7.4% 2.4% 8.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricQCOMNVDAMRVL
Debt / assets 22.3% 10.4% 18.0%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.1x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x -0.2x 0.4x
Debt / FCF 1.2x 0.3x 2.9x
Liabilities / assets 51.8% 28.5% 32.7%
Equity / assets 48.2% 71.5% 67.3%
Interest coverage 14.8x – 7.2x
Current ratio 2.0x 4.6x 3.2x
Quick ratio 1.1x 3.0x 2.5x
Cash ratio 0.7x 1.5x 1.6x
Altman Z-score 6.20 39.04 15.05

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricQCOMNVDAMRVL
Dividend yield 2.0% 0.2% 0.1%
Net buyback yield 4.5% 1.0% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 6.5% 1.3% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 41.3% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 36.7% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 3.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusQCOMNVDAMRVL
Forward P/E 17.1xFY2026 24.9xFY2026 59.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.79FY2026 $8.76FY2026 $4.12FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -10.3%FY2026 +83.6%FY2026 +45.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.0% +91.8% +83.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $45.55BFY2026 $383.27BFY2026 $11.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +3.2%FY2026 +77.5%FY2026 +39.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.0% +85.7% +80.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersQCOMNVDAMRVL
Held by institutions 79.7% 69.0% 78.7%
Institutions holding 3,030 5,924 2,215
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +4.0% +0.1%
Institutions buying 1,416 3,280 1,431
Institutions selling 1,333 2,313 646
Buyers to sellers 1.06 1.42 2.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

QCOMNVDAMRVL
QCOM 1.00 0.20 0.44
NVDA 0.20 1.00 0.42
MRVL 0.44 0.42 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, QCOM, NVDA and MRVL?

Nvidia (NVDA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Qualcomm (QCOM) $192.69B, Nvidia (NVDA) $5.21T, Marvell Technology (MRVL) $224.88B.

Which stock is cheaper, QCOM, NVDA and MRVL?

Qualcomm (QCOM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.8x, Nvidia (NVDA) 27.0x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 85.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Qualcomm (QCOM) is cheapest (Qualcomm (QCOM) 17.1x, Nvidia (NVDA) 24.9x, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 59.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nvidia (NVDA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.9%, Nvidia (NVDA) +83.4%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +30.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nvidia (NVDA) has the highest net margin (Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.0%, Nvidia (NVDA) 63.7%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 27.9%). On return on invested capital, Nvidia (NVDA) leads (Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.5%, Nvidia (NVDA) 71.1%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 5.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marvell Technology (MRVL) returned the most: Qualcomm (QCOM) -1.9%, Nvidia (NVDA) +13.8%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +174.6%. Over five years, Nvidia (NVDA) compounded fastest (Qualcomm (QCOM) +6.6%/yr, Nvidia (NVDA) +54.3%/yr, Marvell Technology (MRVL) +28.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Qualcomm (QCOM) 0.02%, Nvidia (NVDA) 0.00%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 0.00%. Nvidia (NVDA) and Marvell Technology (MRVL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Nvidia (NVDA) has been the steadiest (Qualcomm (QCOM) 53.0%, Nvidia (NVDA) 37.7%, Marvell Technology (MRVL) 79.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, QCOM, NVDA and MRVL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Nvidia (NVDA) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.