PWR vs RECT vs ECG Stock Comparison

Quanta Services, Rectitude Holdings and Everus Construction Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PRIM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.
$578.87 -10.8% 1M +31.0% 1Y
Market cap
$90.29B
P/E
68.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$32.91B
Div. yield
0.00%
Utility Construction Industrials
3 wins
RECT Rectitude Holdings Ltd.
$1.25 -3.8% 1M -63.7% 1Y
Market cap
$18.27M
P/E
6.5x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Industrial Distribution Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Everus Construction leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Everus Construction 5, Quanta Services 3, Rectitude Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPWRRECTECGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $90.29B $18.27M $5.38B PWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 68.0x 6.5x 21.2x RECT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 36.5x — 19.7x ECG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.3% — +30.5% ECG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.0% — 6.0% ECG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.1% — 23.9% ECG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — 0.3x ECG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +31.0% -63.7% +11.0% PWR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +36.7%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.8% 105.3% 62.2% PWR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 88/100 78/100 RECT

Percentile Scorecard

PWRRECTECG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPWRRECTECG
Valuation 22 #41 of 52 84 #8 of 46 71 #16 of 52
Growth 72 #11 of 37 – 81 #8 of 37
Profitability 75 #10 of 37 – 83 #7 of 37
Financial Health 55 #26 of 57 80 #10 of 47 77 #14 of 57
Shareholder Returns 42 #16 of 27 100 #1 of 32 –
Overall 53 88 78
  • PWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • RECT ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • ECG ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPWRRECTECGSPY
1 month -10.8%-3.8%-12.9% -0.2%
3 months -1.6%+15.7%-13.1% +3.9%
6 months -8.3%-7.4%-25.5% +8.2%
Year to date +37.2%-29.0%+19.0% +12.9%
1 year +31.0%-63.7%+11.0% +12.3%
3 years +251.1%—— +87.4%
3 years, per year +52.0%—— +23.3%
5 years +376.4%—— +67.9%
5 years, per year +36.7%—— +10.9%
10 years +1,953.5%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year +35.3%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePWRRECTECGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.8%105.3%62.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.7%93.0%62.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.730.442.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.69-0.600.18 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.9%-85.4%-56.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.3%-63.7%-39.8% -1.2%
52-week high $785.24$3.44$169.16 $779.14
52-week low $413.17$1.08$80.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePWRRECTECG
P/E now vs peer median 65.5xmedian 26.7x 6.5xmedian 25.3x 20.4xmedian 26.7x
P/S now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 0.8x 0.5xmedian 1.0x 1.2xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.2xmedian 13.1x —median 13.4x 14.4xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 38.0xmedian 23.0x -9.9xmedian 21.9x 20.8xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 8.9xmedian 2.4x 0.8xmedian 2.6x 6.7xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.13median 0.57 —median 2.38 —median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPWRRECTECG
Revenue $32.91B – $4.27B
Gross profit $5.09B – $555.38M
Operating income $2.04B – $330.71M
Net income $1.35B – $254.46M
Free cash flow $2.29B – $250.37M
EPS (diluted) $8.70 – $4.97
Cash & equivalents $506.43M $4.69M $176.70M
Total debt $6.10B $19.48M $274.50M
Shares (diluted) 152.44M 14.50M 51.22M
Enterprise value $88.37B $944.76K $4.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPWRRECTECG
P/E 65.5x 6.5x 20.4x
P/FCF 38.0x -9.9x 20.8x
P/Operating cash flow 27.4x – 16.2x
P/S 2.6x 0.5x 1.2x
P/B 8.9x 0.8x 6.7x
P/Tangible book 13.3x 0.8x 7.4x
EV/EBITDA 30.2x – 14.4x
EV/EBIT 45.5x – 16.0x
EV/Revenue 2.8x – 1.2x
EV/FCF 40.5x – 21.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.1x – 16.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.13 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPWRRECTECG
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.3% – 30.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 21.5% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 29.8% – 42.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 36.3% – 48.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.9% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 36.2% – 53.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.5% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 35.2% – 53.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.7% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 59.6% – 67.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.8% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.4% – 94.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 47.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPWRRECTECG
Gross margin 15.5% – 13.0%
EBITDA margin 9.3% – 8.6%
Operating margin 6.2% – 7.8%
Pretax margin 5.3% – 7.7%
Net margin 4.0% – 6.0%
FCF margin 7.0% – 5.9%
Operating cash flow margin 9.7% – 7.5%
Return on equity 14.3% – 32.6%
Return on assets 5.0% – 12.2%
Return on invested capital 10.1% – 23.9%
Return on capital employed 12.6% – 32.3%
Asset turnover 1.2x – 2.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPWRRECTECG
Debt / assets 21.6% 12.0% 13.3%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.2x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – 0.3x
Debt / FCF 2.7x – 1.1x
Liabilities / assets 65.6% 42.3% 62.4%
Equity / assets 34.4% 57.7% 37.6%
Interest coverage 6.9x – 16.8x
Current ratio 1.1x 2.5x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.7x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 4.62 – 5.78

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPWRRECTECG
Dividend yield 0.1% 8.0% –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.1% 8.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 4.7% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 2.8% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 10.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 12.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPWRRECTECG
Forward P/E 36.5xFY2026 – 19.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $15.88FY2026 – $5.16FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +47.7%FY2026 – +30.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.0% – +8.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $40.73BFY2026 – $4.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +43.0%FY2026 – +21.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.6% – +16.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPWRRECTECG
Held by institutions 88.9% – 84.9%
Institutions holding 1,920 – 537
Change in shares held, QoQ +13.5% – +2.3%
Institutions buying 972 – 262
Institutions selling 704 – 162
Buyers to sellers 1.38 – 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PWRRECTECG
PWR 1.00 0.09 0.72
RECT 0.09 1.00 0.08
ECG 0.72 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PWR, RECT and ECG?

Quanta Services (PWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Quanta Services (PWR) $90.29B, Rectitude Holdings (RECT) $18.27M, Everus Construction (ECG) $5.38B.

Which stock is cheaper, PWR, RECT and ECG?

Rectitude Holdings (RECT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Quanta Services (PWR) 68.0x, Rectitude Holdings (RECT) 6.5x, Everus Construction (ECG) 21.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Everus Construction (ECG) is cheapest (Quanta Services (PWR) 36.5x, Everus Construction (ECG) 19.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Everus Construction (ECG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Quanta Services (PWR) +26.3%, Everus Construction (ECG) +30.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Everus Construction (ECG) has the highest net margin (Quanta Services (PWR) 4.0%, Everus Construction (ECG) 6.0%). On return on invested capital, Everus Construction (ECG) leads (Quanta Services (PWR) 10.1%, Everus Construction (ECG) 23.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quanta Services (PWR) returned the most: Quanta Services (PWR) +31.0%, Rectitude Holdings (RECT) -63.7%, Everus Construction (ECG) +11.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Quanta Services (PWR) 0.00%, Rectitude Holdings (RECT) 0.00%, Everus Construction (ECG) 0.00%. Rectitude Holdings (RECT) and Everus Construction (ECG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Quanta Services (PWR) has been the steadiest (Quanta Services (PWR) 44.8%, Rectitude Holdings (RECT) 105.3%, Everus Construction (ECG) 62.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PWR, RECT and ECG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Everus Construction (ECG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.