PWR vs EME vs ECG Stock Comparison

Quanta Services, Emcor and Everus Construction Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (IESC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.
$546.35 -13.9% 1M +27.8% 1Y
Market cap
$84.69B
P/E
63.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$32.91B
Div. yield
0.00%
Utility Construction Industrials
3 wins
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.
$647.48 -13.9% 1M -7.0% 1Y
Market cap
$29.51B
P/E
20.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.60B
Div. yield
0.00%
Engineering and Construction Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Everus Construction leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Everus Construction 6, Quanta Services 3, Emcor 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPWREMEECGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $84.69B $29.51B $5.02B PWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 63.8x 20.5x 19.7x ECG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 34.4x 18.6x 18.4x ECG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.3% +18.9% +30.5% ECG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.0% 7.7% 6.0% EME
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.1% — 23.9% ECG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — 0.3x ECG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% EME
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.8% -7.0% +8.4% PWR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +35.9%/yr +39.9%/yr — EME
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.7% 46.0% 62.4% PWR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 64/100 80/100 ECG

Percentile Scorecard

PWREMEECG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPWREMEECG
Valuation 26 #39 of 52 57 #23 of 52 80 #11 of 52
Growth 72 #11 of 37 56 #17 of 37 81 #8 of 37
Profitability 72 #11 of 37 86 #6 of 37 83 #7 of 37
Financial Health 50 #29 of 57 70 #18 of 57 77 #14 of 57
Shareholder Returns 42 #16 of 27 54 #13 of 27 –
Overall 52 64 80
  • PWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • EME ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • ECG ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPWREMEECGSPY
1 month -13.9%-13.9%-17.5% -1.0%
3 months -12.7%-13.0%-27.1% +2.9%
6 months -12.6%-25.6%-30.3% +6.4%
Year to date +29.4%+5.8%+10.8% +11.4%
1 year +27.8%-7.0%+8.4% +13.1%
3 years +226.7%+235.8%— +79.4%
3 years, per year +48.4%+49.8%— +21.5%
5 years +362.8%+434.5%— +67.7%
5 years, per year +35.9%+39.9%— +10.9%
10 years +1,832.6%+1,053.7%— +255.2%
10 years, per year +34.5%+27.7%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasurePWREMEECGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.7%46.0%62.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.7%48.2%62.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.711.942.67 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.62-0.150.13 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.9%-36.2%-56.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.4%-31.4%-44.0% -2.5%
52-week high $785.24$943.75$169.16 $779.14
52-week low $413.17$581.58$80.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePWREMEECG
P/E now vs peer median 61.8xmedian 25.6x 20.0xmedian 25.6x 19.0xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 0.8x 1.5xmedian 0.8x 1.1xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 28.6xmedian 12.7x 13.0xmedian 12.7x 13.5xmedian 12.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 35.9xmedian 22.4x 24.5xmedian 22.4x 19.3xmedian 22.4x
P/B now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 2.3x 7.0xmedian 2.3x 6.3xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.01median 0.57 0.43median 0.57 —median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPWREMEECG
Revenue $32.91B $18.60B $4.27B
Gross profit $5.09B $3.61B $555.38M
Operating income $2.04B $1.93B $330.71M
Net income $1.35B $1.44B $254.46M
Free cash flow $2.29B $1.17B $250.37M
EPS (diluted) $8.70 $32.30 $4.97
Cash & equivalents $506.43M $924.41M $176.70M
Total debt $6.10B – $274.50M
Shares (diluted) 152.44M 44.55M 51.22M
Enterprise value $82.77B $25.90B $4.23B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPWREMEECG
P/E 61.8x 20.0x 19.0x
P/FCF 35.9x 24.5x 19.3x
P/Operating cash flow 25.8x 22.2x 15.1x
P/S 2.5x 1.5x 1.1x
P/B 8.4x 7.0x 6.3x
P/Tangible book 12.6x 9.5x 6.9x
EV/EBITDA 28.6x 13.0x 13.5x
EV/EBIT 43.1x 14.4x 14.9x
EV/Revenue 2.7x 1.5x 1.2x
EV/FCF 38.3x 23.7x 19.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.6x 21.5x 15.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.01 0.43 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPWREMEECG
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.3% 18.9% 30.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 21.5% 16.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 29.8% 18.5% 42.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.2% 26.3% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 36.3% 29.9% 48.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.9% 41.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) 36.2% 30.2% 53.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.5% 43.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 35.2% 31.5% 53.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 30.7% 47.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 59.6% -0.6% 67.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.8% 20.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.4% -3.1% 94.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 47.7% 20.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPWREMEECG
Gross margin 15.5% 19.4% 13.0%
EBITDA margin 9.3% 11.5% 8.6%
Operating margin 6.2% 10.4% 7.8%
Pretax margin 5.3% 10.5% 7.7%
Net margin 4.0% 7.7% 6.0%
FCF margin 7.0% 6.3% 5.9%
Operating cash flow margin 9.7% 6.9% 7.5%
Return on equity 14.3% 36.2% 32.6%
Return on assets 5.0% 14.6% 12.2%
Return on invested capital 10.1% – 23.9%
Return on capital employed 12.6% 41.9% 32.3%
Asset turnover 1.2x 1.9x 2.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 0.9x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.1% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPWREMEECG
Debt / assets 21.6% – 13.3%
Debt / equity 0.6x – 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – 0.3x
Debt / FCF 2.7x – 1.1x
Liabilities / assets 65.6% 59.8% 62.4%
Equity / assets 34.4% 40.2% 37.6%
Interest coverage 6.9x – 16.8x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.3x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.2x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 4.46 6.38 5.61

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPWREMEECG
Dividend yield 0.1% 0.2% –
Net buyback yield – 1.5% –
Shareholder yield 0.1% 1.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 4.7% 4.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 2.8% 4.9% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 10.9% 26.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 25.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPWREMEECG
Forward P/E 34.4xFY2026 18.6xFY2026 18.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $15.87FY2026 $34.73FY2026 $5.16FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +47.6%FY2026 +34.2%FY2026 +30.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +27.0% +10.7% +8.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $40.74BFY2026 $19.07BFY2026 $4.57BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +43.0%FY2026 +12.2%FY2026 +21.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +9.5% +13.1% +16.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPWREMEECG
Held by institutions 88.9% 93.1% 84.9%
Institutions holding 1,919 1,235 537
Change in shares held, QoQ +13.5% -0.1% +2.3%
Institutions buying 972 659 262
Institutions selling 703 419 162
Buyers to sellers 1.38 1.57 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PWREMEECG
PWR 1.00 0.77 0.71
EME 0.77 1.00 0.69
ECG 0.71 0.69 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PWR, EME and ECG?

Quanta Services (PWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Quanta Services (PWR) $84.69B, Emcor (EME) $29.51B, Everus Construction (ECG) $5.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, PWR, EME and ECG?

Everus Construction (ECG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Quanta Services (PWR) 63.8x, Emcor (EME) 20.5x, Everus Construction (ECG) 19.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Everus Construction (ECG) is cheapest (Quanta Services (PWR) 34.4x, Emcor (EME) 18.6x, Everus Construction (ECG) 18.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Everus Construction (ECG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Quanta Services (PWR) +26.3%, Emcor (EME) +18.9%, Everus Construction (ECG) +30.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Emcor (EME) has the highest net margin (Quanta Services (PWR) 4.0%, Emcor (EME) 7.7%, Everus Construction (ECG) 6.0%). On return on invested capital, Everus Construction (ECG) leads (Quanta Services (PWR) 10.1%, Everus Construction (ECG) 23.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Quanta Services (PWR) returned the most: Quanta Services (PWR) +27.8%, Emcor (EME) -7.0%, Everus Construction (ECG) +8.4%. Over five years, Emcor (EME) compounded fastest (Quanta Services (PWR) +35.9%/yr, Emcor (EME) +39.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Emcor (EME) has the highest dividend yield: Quanta Services (PWR) 0.00%, Emcor (EME) 0.00%, Everus Construction (ECG) 0.00%. Everus Construction (ECG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Quanta Services (PWR) has been the steadiest (Quanta Services (PWR) 44.7%, Emcor (EME) 46.0%, Everus Construction (ECG) 62.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PWR, EME and ECG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Everus Construction (ECG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.