PUK vs EQH vs MET Stock Comparison

Prudential, Equitable Holdings and Metlife Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BNT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PUK Prudential Plc
$26.38 +7.6% 1M -6.0% 1Y
Market cap
$32.40B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Life Insurance Financial Services
EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc.
$56.11 +3.9% 1M +14.8% 1Y
Market cap
$14.90B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$10.62B
Div. yield
0.02%
Life Insurance Financial Services
1 win
MET Metlife Inc
$102.84 +6.2% 1M +29.4% 1Y
Market cap
$66.15B
P/E
19.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$79.40B
Div. yield
0.02%
Life Insurance Financial Services
9 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Metlife leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Metlife 9, Equitable Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPUKEQHMETLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $32.40B $14.90B $66.15B MET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — -15.2x 19.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.7x 8.2x 10.4x EQH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -22.1% +8.7% MET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -9.3% 4.3% MET
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -6.4% 32.5% MET
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.02% MET
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -6.0% +14.8% +29.4% MET
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -8.0%/yr +9.8%/yr +10.0%/yr MET
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 29.3% 33.6% 24.0% MET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 23/100 45/100 MET

Percentile Scorecard

PUKEQHMET

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPUKEQHMET
Valuation – 24 #91 of 119 72 #34 of 119
Growth – 5 #110 of 116 27 #85 of 116
Profitability – 10 #105 of 116 39 #71 of 116
Financial Health 68 #39 of 118 5 #112 of 118 48 #62 of 118
Shareholder Returns 33 #73 of 109 73 #30 of 109 40 #66 of 109
Overall – 23 45
  • PUK ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • EQH ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • MET ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPUKEQHMETSPY
1 month +7.6%+3.9%+6.2% -1.0%
3 months -5.6%+9.3%+6.8% -0.4%
6 months -18.5%+28.3%+28.3% +4.5%
Year to date -15.2%+17.8%+30.3% +12.4%
1 year -6.0%+14.8%+29.4% +13.6%
3 years +18.4%+103.0%+66.5% +76.4%
3 years, per year +5.8%+26.6%+18.5% +20.8%
5 years -34.0%+59.4%+60.7% +63.7%
5 years, per year -8.0%+9.8%+10.0% +10.4%
10 years -16.4%—+146.4% +267.7%
10 years, per year -1.8%—+9.4% +13.9%

Risk

MeasurePUKEQHMETSPY
Volatility, 1Y 29.3%33.6%24.0% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.6%37.2%24.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.221.190.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.200.441.23 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -64.2%-37.1%-36.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.5%0.0%-0.7% -1.6%
52-week high $33.61$56.11$103.55 $779.14
52-week low $23.53$35.34$67.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePUKEQHMET
P/E now vs peer median —median 11.1x -15.9xmedian 11.1x 19.2xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.4x 1.4xmedian 1.4x 0.8xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.3x —median 7.3x —median 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 9.0x 11.6xmedian 9.0x 4.4xmedian 9.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.6x 17.9xmedian 1.6x 2.4xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.64 0.38median 0.64 1.82median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPUKEQHMET
Revenue – $10.62B $79.40B
Gross profit – $8.95B $29.06B
Operating income – -$384.00M $14.51B
Net income – -$816.00M $3.66B
Free cash flow – $1.32B $14.81B
EPS (diluted) – $-3.53 $5.32
Cash & equivalents $5.89B $17.18B $19.30B
Total debt $16.00M $3.84B $5.89B
Shares (diluted) 1.30B 278.30M 646.90M
Enterprise value -$721.11B -$44.81B -$40.63B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPUKEQHMET
P/E – -15.9x 19.2x
P/FCF – 11.6x 4.4x
P/Operating cash flow – 11.3x 4.2x
P/S – 1.4x 0.8x
P/B 1.6x 17.9x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 17.9x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT – -0.6x 3.0x
EV/Revenue – 0.0x 0.6x
EV/FCF – 0.2x 3.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 0.2x 2.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.38 1.82

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPUKEQHMET
Revenue growth (1Y) – -22.1% 8.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 3.7% 4.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -16.6% 6.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 9.6% 10.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -131.7% 5.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -29.1% 10.8%
Net income growth (1Y) – -220.5% -14.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -34.6% 4.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – -366.1% -12.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -41.6% 10.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -14.2% 2.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 176.8% 10.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -12.6% 2.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 124.9% 12.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPUKEQHMET
Gross margin – 84.3% 36.6%
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin – -3.6% 18.3%
Pretax margin – -5.7% 6.1%
Net margin – -9.3% 4.3%
FCF margin – 12.4% 18.7%
Operating cash flow margin – 12.8% 19.6%
Return on equity – -38.7% 13.2%
Return on assets – -0.2% 0.5%
Return on invested capital – -6.4% 32.5%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -1.7x 4.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPUKEQHMET
Debt / assets 0.0% 1.1% 0.8%
Debt / equity 0.0x 4.5x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 2.9x 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 90.8% 99.7% 96.3%
Equity / assets 9.2% 0.3% 3.7%
Interest coverage – -1.7x 1.5x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPUKEQHMET
Dividend yield 2.1% 2.0% 2.3%
Net buyback yield – 10.7% 3.7%
Shareholder yield 2.1% 12.7% 6.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -38.8% 41.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 24.0% 10.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.3% -0.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 2.0% -1.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPUKEQHMET
Forward P/E 11.7xFY2026 8.2xFY2026 10.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.25FY2026 $6.87FY2026 $9.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +10.8%FY2026 +21.8%FY2026 +11.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +20.4% +23.6% +7.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.28BFY2026 $16.47BFY2026 $83.11BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +112.9%FY2026 +9.4%FY2026 +7.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.8% +8.7% -2.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPUKEQHMET
Held by institutions 2.9% 95.4% 75.7%
Institutions holding 284 482 1,444
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +14.2% +0.7%
Institutions buying 154 214 724
Institutions selling 96 205 484
Buyers to sellers 1.60 1.04 1.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PUKEQHMET
PUK 1.00 0.40 0.38
EQH 0.40 1.00 0.65
MET 0.38 0.65 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PUK, EQH and MET?

Metlife (MET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Prudential (PUK) $32.40B, Equitable Holdings (EQH) $14.90B, Metlife (MET) $66.15B.

Which company is growing faster?

Metlife (MET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Equitable Holdings (EQH) -22.1%, Metlife (MET) +8.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Metlife (MET) has the highest net margin (Equitable Holdings (EQH) -9.3%, Metlife (MET) 4.3%). On return on invested capital, Metlife (MET) leads (Equitable Holdings (EQH) -6.4%, Metlife (MET) 32.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Metlife (MET) returned the most: Prudential (PUK) -6.0%, Equitable Holdings (EQH) +14.8%, Metlife (MET) +29.4%. Over five years, Metlife (MET) compounded fastest (Prudential (PUK) -8.0%/yr, Equitable Holdings (EQH) +9.8%/yr, Metlife (MET) +10.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Metlife (MET) has the highest dividend yield: Prudential (PUK) 0.00%, Equitable Holdings (EQH) 0.02%, Metlife (MET) 0.02%. Prudential (PUK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Metlife (MET) has been the steadiest (Prudential (PUK) 29.3%, Equitable Holdings (EQH) 33.6%, Metlife (MET) 24.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PUK, EQH and MET?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Metlife (MET) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.