PR vs FANG vs AR Stock Comparison

Permian Resources, Diamondback Energy and Antero Resources Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EOG) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PR Permian Resources Corp
$25.57 +20.6% 1M +104.1% 1Y
Market cap
$21.42B
P/E
17.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.74B
Div. yield
2.46%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
5 wins
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.
$206.43 +12.2% 1M +43.7% 1Y
Market cap
$57.92B
P/E
39.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.10B
Div. yield
2.06%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
2 wins
AR ANTERO RESOURCES Corp
$41.19 +22.8% 1M +30.3% 1Y
Market cap
$12.65B
P/E
9.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.48B
Div. yield
–
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Antero Resources leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Antero Resources 5, Permian Resources 5, Diamondback Energy 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPRFANGARLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.42B $57.92B $12.65B FANG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 17.3x 39.6x 9.2x AR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.3x 9.5x 8.9x AR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.8% +21.4% +27.1% AR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.5% 8.6% 21.2% PR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.8% 1.6% 12.5% AR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 1.9x 1.0x PR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.46% 2.06% — PR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +104.1% +43.7% +30.3% PR
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +28.9%/yr +14.0%/yr +15.7%/yr PR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.9% 31.9% 37.8% FANG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 44/100 67/100 AR

Percentile Scorecard

PRFANGAR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPRFANGAR
Valuation 41 #59 of 99 46 #54 of 99 66 #34 of 99
Growth 87 #14 of 97 57 #42 of 97 98 #3 of 97
Profitability 85 #15 of 96 50 #49 of 96 64 #35 of 96
Financial Health 58 #43 of 102 37 #65 of 102 48 #54 of 102
Shareholder Returns 33 #52 of 77 29 #55 of 77 61 #31 of 77
Overall 61 44 67
  • PR ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • FANG ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • AR ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPRFANGARSPY
1 month +20.6%+12.2%+22.8% +0.7%
3 months +21.8%+3.3%+16.6% +3.7%
6 months +18.3%+0.4%+4.9% +7.1%
Year to date +82.3%+37.3%+19.5% +12.8%
1 year +104.1%+43.7%+30.3% +11.9%
3 years +76.6%+30.3%+44.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year +20.9%+9.2%+13.0% +22.8%
5 years +255.1%+92.6%+107.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +28.9%+14.0%+15.7% +10.9%
10 years +71.8%+119.6%+53.8% +262.0%
10 years, per year +5.6%+8.2%+4.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePRFANGARSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.9%31.9%37.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.4%30.6%37.5% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.54-0.54-0.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.161.370.80 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -44.3%-43.5%-58.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.7%-3.4%-8.8% -1.2%
52-week high $25.76$213.69$45.15 $779.14
52-week low $12.13$137.29$30.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePRFANGAR
P/E now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 11.9x 39.6xmedian 11.9x 9.2xmedian 11.9x
P/S now vs peer median 3.7xmedian 2.0x 3.4xmedian 2.0x 2.0xmedian 2.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.9xmedian 5.9x 11.1xmedian 5.9x 5.8xmedian 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.9xmedian 10.0x 15.7xmedian 10.0x 13.8xmedian 10.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 1.5x 1.3xmedian 1.5x 1.5xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 10.15median 1.36 -1.12median 1.36 0.52median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPRFANGAR
Revenue $5.74B $17.10B $6.48B
Gross profit – – $215.32M
Operating income $2.06B $1.08B $1.79B
Net income $1.31B $1.63B $1.40B
Free cash flow $1.08B $3.68B $918.50M
R&D $25.50M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.44 $5.22 $4.45
Cash & equivalents $131.72M $462.00M –
Total debt $2.99B $12.61B $2.78B
Shares (diluted) 855.24M 281.20M 308.63M
Enterprise value $20.85B $63.10B $12.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPRFANGAR
P/E 17.3x 39.6x 9.2x
P/FCF 19.9x 15.7x 13.8x
P/Operating cash flow 5.4x 5.7x 5.6x
P/S 3.7x 3.4x 2.0x
P/B 1.8x 1.3x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 1.8x 1.3x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 5.9x 11.1x 5.8x
EV/EBIT 11.8x 64.8x 8.6x
EV/Revenue 4.2x 4.1x 2.4x
EV/FCF 22.5x 19.0x 16.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 6.1x 6.9x 6.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 10.15 -1.12 0.52

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPRFANGAR
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.8% 21.4% 27.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 31.0% 27.2% 6.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 131.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 45.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 26.7% -78.1% 173.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.7% -39.5% 14.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -3.1% -61.4% 122.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.8% -23.4% 12.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -5.5% -60.3% 134.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.7% -35.2% 17.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 6.1% 33.8% 45.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.3% 17.2% 24.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 280.2% 143.6% 38.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 36.3% 32.8% 240.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPRFANGAR
Gross margin – – 3.3%
EBITDA margin 72.2% 37.0% 41.0%
Operating margin 35.8% 6.3% 27.6%
Pretax margin 29.0% 10.8% 27.7%
Net margin 21.5% 8.6% 21.2%
FCF margin 18.8% 21.5% 14.2%
Operating cash flow margin 69.6% 59.3% 34.6%
Return on equity 11.2% 3.5% 16.6%
Return on assets 7.2% 2.2% 9.1%
Return on invested capital 10.8% 1.6% 12.5%
Return on capital employed 12.6% 1.7% 13.3%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.2x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.1x 6.2x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPRFANGAR
Debt / assets 16.2% 18.0% 17.9%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.3x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 1.9x 1.0x
Debt / FCF 2.8x 3.4x 3.0x
Liabilities / assets 35.1% 37.4% 44.5%
Equity / assets 64.9% 62.6% 55.5%
Interest coverage 7.8x – –
Current ratio 0.6x 0.5x 0.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.4x –
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score 2.77 1.69 2.05

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPRFANGAR
Dividend yield 2.5% 2.1% –
Net buyback yield 0.1% 3.0% 1.4%
Shareholder yield 2.6% 5.0% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 72.3% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 32.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -6.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -10.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPRFANGAR
Forward P/E 11.3xFY2026 9.5xFY2026 8.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.26FY2026 $21.78FY2026 $4.64FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +76.6%FY2026 +62.9%FY2026 +169.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +11.1% -5.9% -1.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.46BFY2026 $18.60BFY2026 $7.13BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +27.5%FY2026 +38.3%FY2026 +35.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.3% -7.7% -9.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPRFANGAR
Held by institutions 91.3% 71.6% 88.4%
Institutions holding 616 1,191 624
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.4% +8.6% +1.5%
Institutions buying 349 610 381
Institutions selling 183 394 156
Buyers to sellers 1.91 1.55 2.44

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PRFANGAR
PR 1.00 0.84 0.59
FANG 0.84 1.00 0.54
AR 0.59 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PR, FANG and AR?

Diamondback Energy (FANG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Permian Resources (PR) $21.42B, Diamondback Energy (FANG) $57.92B, Antero Resources (AR) $12.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, PR, FANG and AR?

Antero Resources (AR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Permian Resources (PR) 17.3x, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 39.6x, Antero Resources (AR) 9.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Antero Resources (AR) is cheapest (Permian Resources (PR) 11.3x, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 9.5x, Antero Resources (AR) 8.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Antero Resources (AR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Permian Resources (PR) +12.8%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) +21.4%, Antero Resources (AR) +27.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Permian Resources (PR) has the highest net margin (Permian Resources (PR) 21.5%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 8.6%, Antero Resources (AR) 21.2%). On return on invested capital, Antero Resources (AR) leads (Permian Resources (PR) 10.8%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 1.6%, Antero Resources (AR) 12.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Permian Resources (PR) returned the most: Permian Resources (PR) +104.1%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) +43.7%, Antero Resources (AR) +30.3%. Over five years, Permian Resources (PR) compounded fastest (Permian Resources (PR) +28.9%/yr, Diamondback Energy (FANG) +14.0%/yr, Antero Resources (AR) +15.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Permian Resources (PR) has the highest dividend yield: Permian Resources (PR) 2.46%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 2.06%. Antero Resources (AR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Diamondback Energy (FANG) has been the steadiest (Permian Resources (PR) 32.9%, Diamondback Energy (FANG) 31.9%, Antero Resources (AR) 37.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PR, FANG and AR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Antero Resources (AR) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.