PLD vs REXR vs OMAB Stock Comparison

Prologis, Rexford Industrial Realty and Central North Airport Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EGP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PLD Prologis, Inc.
$126.41 -5.7% 1M +0.5% 1Y
Market cap
$117.84B
P/E
28.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.19B
Div. yield
–
Industrial REITs Real Estate
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Prologis leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Prologis 5, Central North Airport 3, Rexford Industrial Realty 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPLDREXROMABLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $117.84B $8.50B $4.78B PLD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.0x -21.2x 16.0x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.5x — 14.6x OMAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.3% +0.5% — PLD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 45.7% -40.4% — PLD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.05% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.5% -9.5% -3.8% PLD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.6%/yr -10.0%/yr +14.6%/yr OMAB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 20.5% 25.7% 31.1% PLD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 49/100 44/100 REXR

Percentile Scorecard

PLDREXROMAB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPLDREXROMAB
Valuation 10 #131 of 145 29 #104 of 145 28 #98 of 136
Growth 59 #60 of 144 32 #99 of 144 –
Profitability 77 #33 of 140 16 #118 of 140 –
Financial Health 86 #21 of 146 90 #16 of 146 34 #97 of 147
Shareholder Returns 9 #120 of 132 79 #28 of 132 70 #26 of 84
Overall 48 49 44
  • PLD ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • REXR ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPLDREXROMABSPY
1 month -5.7%+1.5%-2.7% -1.0%
3 months -14.4%-0.4%-4.7% +2.9%
6 months -11.0%+9.2%-15.4% +6.4%
Year to date -1.0%0.0%-9.4% +11.4%
1 year +0.5%-9.5%-3.8% +13.1%
3 years +24.3%-10.9%+53.7% +79.4%
3 years, per year +7.5%-3.8%+15.4% +21.5%
5 years -12.2%-40.9%+97.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year -2.6%-10.0%+14.6% +10.9%
10 years +141.2%+76.1%+101.2% +255.2%
10 years, per year +9.2%+5.8%+7.2% +13.5%

Risk

MeasurePLDREXROMABSPY
Volatility, 1Y 20.5%25.7%31.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.8%23.1%28.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.390.461.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.02-0.37-0.12 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -48.1%-62.4%-42.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.7%-9.5%-27.0% -2.5%
52-week high $149.92$42.77$134.98 $779.14
52-week low $122.40$32.47$88.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePLDREXROMAB
P/E now vs peer median 28.1xmedian 27.0x -21.6xmedian 27.0x 16.0xmedian 16.0x
P/S now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 4.1x 8.7xmedian 4.1x 5.4xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 14.5x —median 14.5x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -256.6xmedian 23.7x 38.0xmedian 23.7x 11.8xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.3x 1.1xmedian 1.3x 7.5xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 3.34median 2.07 0.37median 2.07 —median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPLDREXROMAB
Revenue $9.19B $991.92M –
Operating income $5.03B – –
Net income $4.47B -$403.93M –
Free cash flow -$459.56M $227.15M –
EPS (diluted) $4.39 $-1.79 –
Cash & equivalents $1.77B $32.23M $172.32M
Total debt $36.44B $3.26B $1.84B
Shares (diluted) 957.88M 223.81M –
Enterprise value $112.88B $8.00B $4.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPLDREXROMAB
P/E 28.1x -21.6x 16.0x
P/FCF -256.6x 38.0x 11.8x
P/Operating cash flow 22.5x 17.0x –
P/S 12.8x 8.7x 5.4x
P/B 2.0x 1.1x 7.5x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 1.1x -9.6x
EV/EBITDA 19.4x – –
EV/EBIT 30.3x – –
EV/Revenue 16.6x 12.0x –
EV/FCF -332.1x 52.2x –
EV/Operating cash flow 29.1x 23.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.34 0.37 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPLDREXROMAB
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.3% 0.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 11.1% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.7% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.6% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 21.9% -222.4% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 8.9% -58.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) 21.8% -238.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.4% -57.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.3% -2.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.9% 11.5% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -130.1% 296.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 47.6% 28.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPLDREXROMAB
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 85.4% – –
Operating margin 54.7% – –
Pretax margin 51.9% – –
Net margin 45.7% -40.4% –
FCF margin -5.0% 22.9% –
Operating cash flow margin 57.0% 51.3% –
Return on equity 7.7% -4.9% –
Return on assets 4.5% -3.4% –
Return on invested capital 5.0% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x -1.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 2.2% 8.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPLDREXROMAB
Debt / assets 36.1% 28.1% 43.4%
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.4x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.4x – –
Debt / FCF -79.3x 14.4x –
Liabilities / assets 42.5% 32.2% 63.1%
Equity / assets 57.5% 67.8% 36.9%
Interest coverage 4.8x – –
Current ratio – – 1.3x
Quick ratio – – 1.2x
Cash ratio – – 0.7x
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPLDREXROMAB
Dividend yield 3.3% 4.4% 5.5%
Net buyback yield – 6.4% –
Shareholder yield 3.3% 10.8% 5.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -99.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 176.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 5.7% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 17.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPLDREXROMAB
Forward P/E 35.5xFY2026 – 14.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.56FY2026 $-1.11FY2026 $6.73FY2026
EPS growth, next FY 0.0%FY2026 -229.1%FY2026 +5.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.0% – +29.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.99BFY2026 $978.53MFY2026 $942.26MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.2%FY2026 -0.2%FY2026 +2.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.3% -11.3% +20.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPLDREXROMAB
Held by institutions 94.5% 100.0% 12.3%
Institutions holding 1,724 420 163
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.5% +1.3% +5.4%
Institutions buying 968 193 77
Institutions selling 531 168 59
Buyers to sellers 1.82 1.15 1.31

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PLDREXROMAB
PLD 1.00 0.62 0.14
REXR 0.62 1.00 0.06
OMAB 0.14 0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PLD, REXR and OMAB?

Prologis (PLD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Prologis (PLD) $117.84B, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) $8.50B, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.78B.

Which stock is cheaper, PLD, REXR and OMAB?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Prologis (PLD) 28.0x, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) -21.2x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Central North Airport (OMAB) is cheapest (Prologis (PLD) 35.5x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 14.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Prologis (PLD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Prologis (PLD) +7.3%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) +0.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Prologis (PLD) has the highest net margin (Prologis (PLD) 45.7%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) -40.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Prologis (PLD) returned the most: Prologis (PLD) +0.5%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) -9.5%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -3.8%. Over five years, Central North Airport (OMAB) compounded fastest (Prologis (PLD) -2.6%/yr, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) -10.0%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +14.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Prologis (PLD) 0.00%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) 0.05%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 0.00%. Prologis (PLD) and Central North Airport (OMAB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Prologis (PLD) has been the steadiest (Prologis (PLD) 20.5%, Rexford Industrial Realty (REXR) 25.7%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PLD, REXR and OMAB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Prologis (PLD) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.