PLD vs AMT vs TRNO Stock Comparison

Prologis, American Tower and Terreno Realty Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (LXP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PLD Prologis, Inc.
$126.41 -5.7% 1M +0.5% 1Y
Market cap
$117.84B
P/E
28.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.19B
Div. yield
–
Industrial REITs Real Estate
2 wins
AMT American Tower Corp /Ma/
$188.97 +10.6% 1M -0.7% 1Y
Market cap
$87.68B
P/E
25.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.94B
Div. yield
–
Tower REITs Real Estate
3 wins
TRNO Terreno Realty Corp
$65.16 -1.3% 1M +7.0% 1Y
Market cap
$6.93B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$502.88M
Div. yield
0.03%
Industrial REITs Real Estate
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Terreno Realty leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Terreno Realty 6, American Tower 3, Prologis 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPLDAMTTRNOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $117.84B $87.68B $6.93B PLD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.0x 25.8x 17.9x TRNO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.5x 28.0x 31.6x AMT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.3% +6.6% +18.0% TRNO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 45.7% 31.1% 76.9% TRNO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 5.0% 9.2% — AMT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.4x 5.1x — PLD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.5% -0.7% +7.0% TRNO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.6%/yr -7.9%/yr -1.9%/yr TRNO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 20.5% 28.5% 19.7% TRNO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 56/100 56/100 AMT

Percentile Scorecard

PLDAMTTRNO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPLDAMTTRNO
Valuation 10 #131 of 145 30 #8 of 11 9 #132 of 145
Growth 59 #60 of 144 89 #2 of 10 89 #17 of 144
Profitability 77 #33 of 140 67 #4 of 10 30 #99 of 140
Financial Health 86 #21 of 146 40 #7 of 11 98 #4 of 146
Shareholder Returns 9 #120 of 132 – 55 #60 of 132
Overall 48 56 56
  • PLD ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • AMT ranked among 11 companies in Infrastructure REITs
  • TRNO ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPLDAMTTRNOSPY
1 month -5.7%+10.6%-1.3% -1.0%
3 months -14.4%+13.4%-10.4% +2.9%
6 months -11.0%+6.0%-0.2% +6.4%
Year to date -1.0%+7.6%+11.0% +11.4%
1 year +0.5%-0.7%+7.0% +13.1%
3 years +24.3%+15.8%+25.9% +79.4%
3 years, per year +7.5%+5.0%+8.0% +21.5%
5 years -12.2%-33.6%-9.3% +67.7%
5 years, per year -2.6%-7.9%-1.9% +10.9%
10 years +141.2%+63.3%+145.9% +255.2%
10 years, per year +9.2%+5.0%+9.4% +13.5%

Risk

MeasurePLDAMTTRNOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 20.5%28.5%19.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.8%28.7%20.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.39-0.060.35 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.02-0.020.35 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -48.1%-46.1%-40.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.7%-2.7%-13.2% -2.5%
52-week high $149.92$194.12$75.07 $779.14
52-week low $122.40$161.11$57.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePLDAMTTRNO
P/E now vs peer median 28.1xmedian 27.0x 25.9xmedian 24.1x 17.9xmedian 27.0x
P/S now vs peer median 12.8xmedian 4.1x 8.0xmedian 6.3x 14.0xmedian 4.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 14.5x 17.7xmedian 16.7x —median 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median -256.6xmedian 23.7x 22.2xmedian 18.0x -10.2xmedian 23.7x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 1.3x 8.6xmedian 2.3x 1.6xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 3.34median 2.07 0.50median 0.71 0.64median 2.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPLDAMTTRNO
Revenue $9.19B $10.94B $502.88M
Gross profit – $10.78B –
Operating income $5.03B $4.90B –
Net income $4.47B $3.52B $388.59M
Free cash flow -$459.56M $3.96B -$686.58M
EPS (diluted) $4.39 $7.29 $3.63
Cash & equivalents $1.77B $1.76B $51.21M
Total debt $36.44B $37.19B $3.85B
Shares (diluted) 957.88M 466.27M 106.67M
Enterprise value $112.88B $80.88B $6.74B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPLDAMTTRNO
P/E 28.1x 25.9x 17.9x
P/FCF -256.6x 22.2x -10.2x
P/Operating cash flow 22.5x 15.2x 24.5x
P/S 12.8x 8.0x 14.0x
P/B 2.0x 8.6x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 2.0x -23.6x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 19.4x 17.7x –
EV/EBIT 30.3x 25.2x –
EV/Revenue 16.6x 11.3x 15.7x
EV/FCF -332.1x 31.2x -11.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 29.1x 21.4x 27.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.34 0.50 0.64

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPLDAMTTRNO
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.3% 6.6% 18.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 5.4% 18.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 6.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.7% 4.9% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 10.6% 20.1% –
Net income growth (1Y) 21.9% 164.5% 52.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 8.9% 58.7% 38.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 21.8% 164.5% 47.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.4% 52.1% 27.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.3% 10.1% 17.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.9% 9.5% 19.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -130.1% 5.8% -78.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 47.6% 18.2% -16.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPLDAMTTRNO
Gross margin – 98.5% –
EBITDA margin 85.4% 63.7% –
Operating margin 54.7% 44.8% –
Pretax margin 51.9% 36.0% –
Net margin 45.7% 31.1% 76.9%
FCF margin -5.0% 36.2% -136.5%
Operating cash flow margin 57.0% 52.8% 57.0%
Return on equity 7.7% 34.5% –
Return on assets 4.5% 5.6% –
Return on invested capital 5.0% 9.2% –
Return on capital employed – 9.0% –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.6x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 2.2% 1.5% 3.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPLDAMTTRNO
Debt / assets 36.1% 58.8% 16.5%
Debt / equity 0.6x 3.6x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.4x 5.1x –
Debt / FCF -79.3x 9.4x -1.4x
Liabilities / assets 42.5% 83.8% 22.4%
Equity / assets 57.5% 16.2% 77.6%
Interest coverage 4.8x 3.5x –
Current ratio – 0.4x –
Quick ratio – 0.3x –
Cash ratio – 0.2x –
Altman Z-score – 1.20 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPLDAMTTRNO
Dividend yield 3.3% 3.7% 3.3%
Net buyback yield – 0.2% -4.4%
Shareholder yield 3.3% 3.9% -1.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 55.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -31.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 11.4%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 21.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPLDAMTTRNO
Forward P/E 35.5xFY2026 28.0xFY2026 31.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.56FY2026 $6.75FY2026 $2.06FY2026
EPS growth, next FY 0.0%FY2026 +25.0%FY2026 -47.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +2.0% -0.3% -5.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.99BFY2026 $11.51BFY2026 $545.40MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.2%FY2026 +8.2%FY2026 +14.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.3% +4.0% +1.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPLDAMTTRNO
Held by institutions 94.5% 94.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 1,724 1,743 384
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.5% +2.5% +3.0%
Institutions buying 968 860 202
Institutions selling 531 657 126
Buyers to sellers 1.82 1.31 1.60

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PLDAMTTRNO
PLD 1.00 0.25 0.74
AMT 0.25 1.00 0.18
TRNO 0.74 0.18 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PLD, AMT and TRNO?

Prologis (PLD) is the largest by market capitalisation: Prologis (PLD) $117.84B, American Tower (AMT) $87.68B, Terreno Realty (TRNO) $6.93B.

Which stock is cheaper, PLD, AMT and TRNO?

Terreno Realty (TRNO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Prologis (PLD) 28.0x, American Tower (AMT) 25.8x, Terreno Realty (TRNO) 17.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, American Tower (AMT) is cheapest (Prologis (PLD) 35.5x, American Tower (AMT) 28.0x, Terreno Realty (TRNO) 31.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Terreno Realty (TRNO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Prologis (PLD) +7.3%, American Tower (AMT) +6.6%, Terreno Realty (TRNO) +18.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Terreno Realty (TRNO) has the highest net margin (Prologis (PLD) 45.7%, American Tower (AMT) 31.1%, Terreno Realty (TRNO) 76.9%). On return on invested capital, American Tower (AMT) leads (Prologis (PLD) 5.0%, American Tower (AMT) 9.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Terreno Realty (TRNO) returned the most: Prologis (PLD) +0.5%, American Tower (AMT) -0.7%, Terreno Realty (TRNO) +7.0%. Over five years, Terreno Realty (TRNO) compounded fastest (Prologis (PLD) -2.6%/yr, American Tower (AMT) -7.9%/yr, Terreno Realty (TRNO) -1.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Prologis (PLD) 0.00%, American Tower (AMT) 0.00%, Terreno Realty (TRNO) 0.03%. Prologis (PLD) and American Tower (AMT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Terreno Realty (TRNO) has been the steadiest (Prologis (PLD) 20.5%, American Tower (AMT) 28.5%, Terreno Realty (TRNO) 19.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PLD, AMT and TRNO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Terreno Realty (TRNO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.