PL vs GRRR vs HOLO Stock Comparison

Planet Labs PBC, Gorilla Technology and MicroCloud Hologram Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AISP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PL Planet Labs PBC
$14.49 -16.8% 1M +8.9% 1Y
Market cap
$5.27B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$378.28M
Div. yield
–
Computer Vision Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Planet Labs PBC leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Planet Labs PBC 3, Gorilla Technology 3, MicroCloud Hologram 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPLGRRRHOLOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.27B $241.46M $15.81M PL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -14.5x -4.1x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +44.1% +50.4% — GRRR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -95.1% -35.4% — GRRR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -2.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +8.9% -45.3% -73.7% PL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +7.6%/yr -37.9%/yr -89.2%/yr PL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 91.7% 87.6% 67.1% HOLO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 35/100 40/100 — GRRR

Percentile Scorecard

PLGRRRHOLO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPLGRRRHOLO
Valuation 33 #83 of 124 45 #69 of 124 –
Growth 44 #64 of 113 73 #31 of 113 –
Profitability 38 #68 of 109 32 #74 of 109 –
Financial Health 47 #68 of 127 41 #76 of 127 99 #2 of 127
Shareholder Returns 16 #55 of 65 8 #60 of 65 –
Overall 35 40 –
  • PL ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GRRR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPLGRRRHOLOSPY
1 month -16.8%-34.2%-28.1% -0.2%
3 months -29.0%-20.9%-25.9% +3.9%
6 months -58.6%-29.4%-28.1% +8.2%
Year to date -26.5%-15.6%-54.5% +12.9%
1 year +8.9%-45.3%-73.7% +12.3%
3 years +600.0%+13.5%-100.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year +91.4%+4.3%-93.6% +23.3%
5 years +44.3%-90.8%-100.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +7.6%-37.9%-89.2% +10.9%

Risk

MeasurePLGRRRHOLOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 91.7%87.6%67.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 82.3%93.2%74.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.652.662.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.10-0.52-1.10 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -85.7%-99.4%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -71.8%-57.7%-73.7% -1.2%
52-week high $51.40$21.78$4.57 $779.14
52-week low $11.16$7.44$1.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePLGRRRHOLO
P/E now vs peer median -14.5xmedian 38.6x -4.1xmedian 38.6x —median 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 4.4x 1.7xmedian 4.4x —median 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -72.6xmedian 34.5x -2.7xmedian 34.5x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 213.6xmedian 29.4x -36.5xmedian 29.4x —median 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 9.3xmedian 3.3x 1.4xmedian 3.3x 0.0xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.65median 1.28 —median 1.28 —median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPLGRRRHOLO
Revenue $378.28M $140.40M –
Gross profit $209.65M $24.27M –
Operating income -$102.74M -$51.78M –
Net income -$359.87M -$51.45M –
Free cash flow $24.67M -$6.62M –
R&D $128.10M $4.02M –
EPS (diluted) $-1.00 $-2.23 –
Cash & equivalents $415.13M $179.36M $110.42M
Total debt – $6.95B $1.87M
Shares (diluted) 359.59M 22.25M 13.18M
Enterprise value $2.36B -$249.98M -$2.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPLGRRRHOLO
P/E -14.5x -4.1x –
P/FCF 213.6x -36.5x –
P/Operating cash flow 44.8x -11.8x –
P/S 13.9x 1.7x –
P/B 9.3x 1.4x 0.0x
P/Tangible book 9.8x 1.4x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA -72.6x -2.7x –
EV/EBIT -42.9x -2.6x –
EV/Revenue 11.6x 1.0x –
EV/FCF 178.5x -20.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow 37.4x -6.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.65 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPLGRRRHOLO
Revenue growth (1Y) 44.1% 50.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 21.8% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 35.6% -26.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -24.2% 33.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 16.0% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -297.8% 34.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -33.7% – –
EPS growth (1Y) -236.5% 68.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -22.3% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 41.9% 33.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 55.8% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -30.0% 78.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 31.4% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPLGRRRHOLO
Gross margin 55.4% 17.3% –
EBITDA margin -16.0% -36.2% –
Operating margin -27.2% -36.9% –
Pretax margin -93.8% -32.9% –
Net margin -95.1% -35.4% –
FCF margin 6.5% -4.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 31.1% -14.6% –
Return on equity -71.4% -29.1% –
Return on assets -26.8% -15.7% –
Return on invested capital – -2.9% –
Return on capital employed -10.4% -30.8% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.3x 0.4x –
Stock comp / revenue 16.5% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPLGRRRHOLO
Debt / assets – 18.8% 0.0%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x –
Debt / FCF – -11.1x –
Liabilities / assets 60.6% 56.2% 2.9%
Equity / assets 39.4% 43.8% 97.1%
Interest coverage -18.7x -21.8x –
Current ratio 2.8x 2.2x 34.6x
Quick ratio 2.6x 2.1x 107.3x
Cash ratio 2.5x 1.2x 107.0x
Altman Z-score 2.66 0.43 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPLGRRRHOLO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -5.0% -12.3% –
Shareholder yield -5.0% -12.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPLGRRRHOLO
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.05FY2026 $-2.61FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – -396.6%FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $413.71MFY2026 $201.05MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +34.4%FY2026 +98.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +41.2% +217.5% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPLGRRRHOLO
Held by institutions 74.3% 26.6% 3.0%
Institutions holding 481 71 16
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.1% +79.3% +135.7%
Institutions buying 271 50 11
Institutions selling 161 13 0
Buyers to sellers 1.68 3.85 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PLGRRRHOLO
PL 1.00 0.37 0.32
GRRR 0.37 1.00 0.40
HOLO 0.32 0.40 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PL, GRRR and HOLO?

Planet Labs PBC (PL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Planet Labs PBC (PL) $5.27B, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) $241.46M, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $15.81M.

Which company is growing faster?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Planet Labs PBC (PL) +44.1%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) +50.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) has the highest net margin (Planet Labs PBC (PL) -95.1%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -35.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Planet Labs PBC (PL) returned the most: Planet Labs PBC (PL) +8.9%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -45.3%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -73.7%. Over five years, Planet Labs PBC (PL) compounded fastest (Planet Labs PBC (PL) +7.6%/yr, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -37.9%/yr, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) has been the steadiest (Planet Labs PBC (PL) 91.7%, Gorilla Technology (GRRR) 87.6%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PL, GRRR and HOLO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Planet Labs PBC (PL) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.