PHG vs CBLL vs HTFL Stock Comparison

Koninklijke Philips, Ceribell and Heartflow Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (OSUR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PHG Koninklijke Philips Nv
$28.47 +19.0% 1M +4.6% 1Y
Market cap
$29.35B
P/E
15.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.13B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
5 wins
CBLL Ceribell, Inc.
$28.27 +19.3% 1M +149.3% 1Y
Market cap
$1.08B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$108.72M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
2 wins
HTFL Heartflow, Inc.
$54.40 +10.3% 1M +59.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.90B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$212.08M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Koninklijke Philips leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Koninklijke Philips 5, Ceribell 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPHGCBLLHTFLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $29.35B $1.08B $4.90B PHG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.4x -14.6x -41.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.4x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +53.4% +31.3% +42.8% PHG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.3% -68.0% -55.8% PHG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.4% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.3x — CBLL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +4.6% +149.3% +59.8% CBLL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.6%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.5% 51.9% 76.7% PHG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 80/100 38/100 49/100 PHG

Percentile Scorecard

PHGCBLLHTFL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPHGCBLLHTFL
Valuation 98 #6 of 229 22 #180 of 229 27 #167 of 229
Growth 99 #4 of 221 21 #176 of 221 73 #61 of 221
Profitability 92 #17 of 209 36 #135 of 209 42 #121 of 209
Financial Health 36 #155 of 240 80 #50 of 240 84 #39 of 240
Shareholder Returns 78 #33 of 147 32 #101 of 147 19 #119 of 147
Overall 80 38 49
  • PHG ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • CBLL ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • HTFL ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPHGCBLLHTFLSPY
1 month +19.0%+19.3%+10.3% -2.0%
3 months +7.6%+52.6%+99.4% -2.2%
6 months +7.6%+38.8%+81.6% +4.2%
Year to date +5.1%+28.9%+86.6% +10.6%
1 year +4.6%+149.3%+59.8% +10.4%
3 years +38.5%—— +73.6%
3 years, per year +11.5%—— +20.2%
5 years -39.7%—— +61.6%
5 years, per year -9.6%—— +10.1%
10 years -2.8%—— +261.3%
10 years, per year -0.3%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePHGCBLLHTFLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.5%51.9%76.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.8%49.2%77.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.801.211.91 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.162.880.78 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -75.6%-63.9%-48.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -13.5%0.0%-10.1% -3.2%
52-week high $32.91$28.27$60.53 $779.14
52-week low $23.81$10.92$20.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePHGCBLLHTFL
P/E now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 28.1x -14.7xmedian 28.1x -39.7xmedian 28.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 2.9x 10.1xmedian 2.9x 22.2xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.9xmedian 18.0x -13.4xmedian 18.0x -61.0xmedian 18.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.2xmedian 24.8x -19.5xmedian 24.8x -79.7xmedian 24.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.3x 9.3xmedian 2.3x 16.9xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.20median 0.95 —median 0.95 —median 0.95

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPHGCBLLHTFL
Revenue $30.13B $108.72M $212.08M
Gross profit $16.13B $97.04M $169.83M
Operating income $2.79B -$75.87M -$80.25M
Net income $1.45B -$73.88M -$118.37M
Free cash flow $5.23B -$56.43M -$59.18M
R&D $1.99B $25.37M $83.84M
EPS (diluted) $1.98 $-1.92 $-1.37
Cash & equivalents $3.12B $41.99M $34.36M
Total debt $9.23B $20.00M –
Shares (diluted) 962.50M 38.50M 86.40M
Enterprise value $17.62B $528.90M $4.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPHGCBLLHTFL
P/E 14.2x -14.7x -39.7x
P/FCF 5.2x -19.5x -79.7x
P/Operating cash flow 7.7x -19.6x -90.3x
P/S 0.9x 10.1x 22.2x
P/B 2.1x 9.3x 16.9x
P/Tangible book 2.7x 9.3x 16.9x
EV/EBITDA 7.9x -13.4x -61.0x
EV/EBIT 12.0x -13.2x -55.7x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 9.2x 21.1x
EV/FCF 6.4x -17.7x -75.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.4x -17.9x -85.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.20 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPHGCBLLHTFL
Revenue growth (1Y) 53.4% 31.3% 42.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.1% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 76.3% 33.2% 51.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 49.6% -33.8% -29.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 337.8% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 444.3% -40.8% -26.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 45.2% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 177.7% -34.6% 90.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 69.9% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 154.0% -40.0% 19.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.9% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 74.5% -37.8% 13.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 35.7% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPHGCBLLHTFL
Gross margin 53.5% 89.3% 80.1%
EBITDA margin 14.1% -68.4% -34.6%
Operating margin 9.2% -69.8% -37.8%
Pretax margin 8.7% -68.0% -55.9%
Net margin 6.3% -68.0% -55.8%
FCF margin 17.4% -51.9% -27.9%
Operating cash flow margin 11.8% -51.5% -24.6%
Return on equity 13.2% -60.1% -41.9%
Return on assets 5.5% -45.8% -34.4%
Return on invested capital 12.4% – –
Return on capital employed 12.6% -52.9% -26.7%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 0.8x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 18.6% 11.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPHGCBLLHTFL
Debt / assets 29.0% 12.8% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.4x 1.3x –
Debt / FCF 1.8x -0.4x –
Liabilities / assets 58.7% 24.8% 18.8%
Equity / assets 41.3% 75.2% 81.2%
Interest coverage 6.5x -47.4x -23.2x
Current ratio 1.3x 8.2x 5.1x
Quick ratio 0.8x 7.6x 6.6x
Cash ratio 0.4x 6.5x 5.6x
Altman Z-score – 14.54 39.60

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPHGCBLLHTFL
Dividend yield 3.5% – –
Net buyback yield -0.8% -0.7% -7.3%
Shareholder yield 2.7% -0.7% -7.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPHGCBLLHTFL
Forward P/E 14.4xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.98FY2026 $-1.86FY2026 $-0.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.5%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after -10.1% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $21.63BFY2026 $118.32MFY2026 $261.38MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.8%FY2026 +32.9%FY2026 +48.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -8.2% +21.1% +20.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPHGCBLLHTFL
Held by institutions 5.4% 79.9% 100.0%
Institutions holding 365 124 193
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.8% +2.2% +133.0%
Institutions buying 268 74 140
Institutions selling 76 36 38
Buyers to sellers 3.53 2.06 3.68

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PHGCBLLHTFL
PHG 1.00 0.25 0.13
CBLL 0.25 1.00 0.25
HTFL 0.13 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PHG, CBLL and HTFL?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Koninklijke Philips (PHG) $29.35B, Ceribell (CBLL) $1.08B, Heartflow (HTFL) $4.90B.

Which company is growing faster?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +53.4%, Ceribell (CBLL) +31.3%, Heartflow (HTFL) +42.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has the highest net margin (Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 6.3%, Ceribell (CBLL) -68.0%, Heartflow (HTFL) -55.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ceribell (CBLL) returned the most: Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +4.6%, Ceribell (CBLL) +149.3%, Heartflow (HTFL) +59.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has been the steadiest (Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 28.5%, Ceribell (CBLL) 51.9%, Heartflow (HTFL) 76.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PHG, CBLL and HTFL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.