PG vs MMM vs KMB Stock Comparison

Procter & Gamble, 3M and Kimberly Clark Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PG PROCTER & GAMBLE Co
$161.12 +9.3% 1M +5.9% 1Y
Market cap
$371.61B
P/E
23.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.92B
Div. yield
–
Household Products Consumer Staples
7 wins
MMM 3M Co
$173.47 +1.9% 1M +1.1% 1Y
Market cap
$89.47B
P/E
25.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
2 wins
KMB Kimberly Clark Corp
$110.15 +12.7% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$36.43B
P/E
18.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.58B
Div. yield
0.05%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Procter & Gamble leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Procter & Gamble 7, Kimberly Clark 3, 3M 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPGMMMKMBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $371.61B $89.47B $36.43B PG
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 23.2x 25.3x 18.6x KMB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.9x 19.8x 14.5x KMB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.5% +1.7% +0.7% PG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 18.2% 14.0% 11.8% PG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 17.2% 22.0% 19.4% MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 1.6x 1.7x PG
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.05% KMB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +5.9% +1.1% -7.2% PG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +2.7%/yr +2.8%/yr -3.7%/yr MMM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 20.9% 25.6% 29.4% PG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 49/100 54/100 PG

Percentile Scorecard

PGMMMKMB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPGMMMKMB
Valuation 37 #32 of 50 37 #129 of 203 51 #25 of 50
Growth 52 #24 of 49 60 #76 of 188 44 #28 of 49
Profitability 91 #5 of 44 87 #25 of 187 81 #9 of 44
Financial Health 61 #22 of 55 18 #183 of 222 39 #34 of 55
Shareholder Returns 43 #18 of 31 44 #86 of 153 53 #15 of 31
Overall 57 49 54
  • PG ranked among 59 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • KMB ranked among 59 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPGMMMKMBSPY
1 month +9.3%+1.9%+12.7% -1.0%
3 months +9.3%+0.5%+0.4% +2.9%
6 months +8.7%+18.8%+12.6% +6.4%
Year to date +12.4%+8.4%+9.2% +11.4%
1 year +5.9%+1.1%-7.2% +13.1%
3 years +7.5%+130.2%-8.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +2.4%+32.1%-3.0% +21.5%
5 years +14.4%+14.8%-17.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +2.7%+2.8%-3.7% +10.9%
10 years +91.1%+22.4%-7.9% +255.2%
10 years, per year +6.7%+2.0%-0.8% +13.5%

Risk

MeasurePGMMMKMBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 20.9%25.6%29.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.4%24.7%33.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.080.680.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.280.04-0.25 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -24.6%-53.4%-37.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.6%-5.6%-8.7% -2.5%
52-week high $167.20$183.81$120.66 $779.14
52-week low $138.04$141.20$93.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePGMMMKMB
P/E now vs peer median 23.4xmedian 18.7x 25.5xmedian 25.9x 18.7xmedian 18.7x
P/S now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 1.6x 3.6xmedian 1.9x 2.2xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.2xmedian 13.0x 16.1xmedian 13.7x 13.0xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 24.3xmedian 19.0x 33.5xmedian 21.1x 20.1xmedian 19.0x
P/B now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 2.3x 21.5xmedian 2.3x 19.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 8.81median 0.97 0.71median 1.19 2.85median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPGMMMKMB
Revenue $87.92B $25.25B $16.58B
Gross profit $43.77B $9.98B $6.10B
Operating income $19.83B $4.74B $2.51B
Net income $16.12B $3.58B $1.99B
Free cash flow $15.34B $2.68B $1.82B
R&D – $1.21B –
EPS (diluted) $6.66 $6.77 $5.87
Cash & equivalents $15.37B $4.84B $956.00M
Total debt $146.73B $15.00B $28.07B
Shares (diluted) 2.41B 522.60M 333.30M
Enterprise value $323.17B $70.91B $33.63B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPGMMMKMB
P/E 23.4x 25.5x 18.7x
P/FCF 24.3x 33.5x 20.1x
P/Operating cash flow 18.8x 24.7x 11.0x
P/S 4.2x 3.6x 2.2x
P/B 6.7x 21.5x 19.5x
P/Tangible book 11.0x 42.3x 20.3x
EV/EBITDA 17.2x 16.1x 13.0x
EV/EBIT 20.0x 21.0x 16.8x
EV/Revenue 4.5x 3.9x 2.5x
EV/FCF 25.9x 37.2x 23.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.9x 27.4x 12.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 8.81 0.71 2.85

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPGMMMKMB
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.5% 1.7% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.8% 10.7% -6.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.1% -1.8% 2.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.3% 17.0% -2.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.3% -3.7% -5.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.5% 33.4% 3.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -4.4% 4.8% -18.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.7% 35.4% 6.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -3.2% 7.1% -19.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.7% 35.8% 6.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 5.2% 42.8% 16.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 4.0% -18.1% 1.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 2.7% 68.6% -13.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 1.7% -18.0% -8.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPGMMMKMB
Gross margin 49.8% 39.5% 36.8%
EBITDA margin 26.2% 24.4% 19.5%
Operating margin 22.6% 18.8% 15.2%
Pretax margin 23.2% 17.5% 13.5%
Net margin 18.2% 14.0% 11.8%
FCF margin 17.4% 10.6% 11.0%
Operating cash flow margin 22.7% 14.4% 20.1%
Return on equity 29.4% 101.3% 105.0%
Return on assets 12.4% 9.8% 11.1%
Return on invested capital 17.2% 22.0% 19.4%
Return on capital employed 23.4% 18.7% 23.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 1.0x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.8% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPGMMMKMB
Debt / assets 29.2% 37.9% 35.1%
Debt / equity 0.7x 3.6x 3.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x 1.6x 1.7x
Debt / FCF 2.5x 5.6x 3.6x
Liabilities / assets 58.4% 89.5% 89.9%
Equity / assets 41.6% 10.5% 10.1%
Interest coverage 22.0x – 10.7x
Current ratio 0.7x 1.4x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.8x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 5.37 4.10 3.35

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPGMMMKMB
Dividend yield 3.3% 1.8% 4.6%
Net buyback yield 0.9% 3.0% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 4.2% 4.8% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 44.8% 84.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 59.9% 92.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.2% 2.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -21.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPGMMMKMB
Forward P/E 23.9xFY2027 19.8xFY2026 14.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $6.75FY2027 $8.75FY2026 $7.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -2.0%FY2027 +8.6%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.4% +17.9% -7.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $85.17BFY2027 $23.87BFY2026 $16.98BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.1%FY2027 -1.8%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.1% +17.4% +5.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPGMMMKMB
Held by institutions 69.8% 74.5% 96.8%
Institutions holding 4,026 2,208 1,710
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.0% +0.8% +9.1%
Institutions buying 1,873 914 827
Institutions selling 1,697 837 620
Buyers to sellers 1.10 1.09 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PGMMMKMB
PG 1.00 0.35 0.56
MMM 0.35 1.00 0.34
KMB 0.56 0.34 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PG, MMM and KMB?

Procter & Gamble (PG) is the largest by market capitalisation: Procter & Gamble (PG) $371.61B, 3M (MMM) $89.47B, Kimberly Clark (KMB) $36.43B.

Which stock is cheaper, PG, MMM and KMB?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Procter & Gamble (PG) 23.2x, 3M (MMM) 25.3x, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 18.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Kimberly Clark (KMB) is cheapest (Procter & Gamble (PG) 23.9x, 3M (MMM) 19.8x, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 14.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Procter & Gamble (PG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Procter & Gamble (PG) +3.5%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Procter & Gamble (PG) has the highest net margin (Procter & Gamble (PG) 18.2%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (Procter & Gamble (PG) 17.2%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 19.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Procter & Gamble (PG) returned the most: Procter & Gamble (PG) +5.9%, 3M (MMM) +1.1%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -7.2%. Over five years, 3M (MMM) compounded fastest (Procter & Gamble (PG) +2.7%/yr, 3M (MMM) +2.8%/yr, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -3.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) has the highest dividend yield: Procter & Gamble (PG) 0.00%, 3M (MMM) 0.02%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 0.05%. Procter & Gamble (PG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Procter & Gamble (PG) has been the steadiest (Procter & Gamble (PG) 20.9%, 3M (MMM) 25.6%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 29.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PG, MMM and KMB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Procter & Gamble (PG) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.