PFSI vs USB vs UWMC Stock Comparison

PennyMac Financial Services, Us Bancorp and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FMCC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
USB Us Bancorp De
$60.65 +4.3% 1M +30.0% 1Y
Market cap
$92.39B
P/E
11.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$29.58B
Div. yield
0.03%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
7 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.48 +18.4% 1M -73.8% 1Y
Market cap
$529.91M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Us Bancorp leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Us Bancorp 7, PennyMac Financial Services 2, UWM Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPFSIUSBUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.24B $92.39B $529.91M USB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.4x 11.8x -14.3x PFSI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.0x 11.7x 7.8x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.6% +6.7% +26.1% UWMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 26.4% -1.0% USB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 12.6% 6.3% USB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.8x 10.6x USB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -48.9% +30.0% -73.8% USB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +0.8%/yr +0.1%/yr -26.3%/yr PFSI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.2% 22.2% 80.1% USB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 47/100 35/100 USB

Percentile Scorecard

PFSIUSBUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPFSIUSBUWMC
Valuation 64 #62 of 169 39 #221 of 361 19 #138 of 169
Growth 54 #74 of 159 52 #74 of 153 16 #134 of 159
Profitability 45 #81 of 146 77 #30 of 128 31 #101 of 146
Financial Health – 14 #121 of 140 17 #127 of 153
Shareholder Returns 12 #119 of 135 53 #159 of 335 94 #9 of 135
Overall 44 47 35
  • PFSI ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit
  • USB ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • UWMC ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPFSIUSBUWMCSPY
1 month +1.4%+4.3%+18.4% +0.7%
3 months -15.0%-3.6%-20.9% +3.7%
6 months -28.6%+7.0%-58.2% +7.1%
Year to date -51.1%+13.7%-66.2% +12.8%
1 year -48.9%+30.0%-73.8% +11.9%
3 years -5.1%+93.7%-69.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year -1.7%+24.7%-32.8% +22.8%
5 years +3.9%+0.5%-78.2% +67.6%
5 years, per year +0.8%+0.1%-26.3% +10.9%
10 years +280.3%+35.9%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +14.3%+3.1%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePFSIUSBUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.2%22.2%80.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 67.6%23.2%89.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.810.611.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.941.36-0.92 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -63.8%-54.7%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -59.6%-7.3%-75.7% -1.2%
52-week high $159.46$65.41$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $57.77$45.47$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePFSIUSBUWMC
P/E now vs peer median 8.4xmedian 11.7x 12.1xmedian 12.2x -13.4xmedian 11.7x
P/S now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 2.7x 3.2xmedian 3.4x 0.7xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.1x 7.6xmedian 5.3x 15.1xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.8xmedian 6.5x 7.5xmedian 10.8x -0.5xmedian 6.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.7x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.33 0.99median 1.34 0.26median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPFSIUSBUWMC
Revenue $2.05B $29.58B $3.58B
Net income $239.88M $8.17B -$104.96M
Free cash flow – $12.53B -$4.92B
EPS (diluted) – $5.01 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $233.00M – $498.41M
Total debt – $96.01B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 53.25M 1.56B 337.53M
Enterprise value $3.24B $92.39B -$1.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPFSIUSBUWMC
P/E 8.4x 12.1x -13.4x
P/FCF -1.8x 7.5x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.5x -0.5x
P/S 1.6x 3.2x 0.7x
P/B 0.8x 1.4x 2.4x
P/Tangible book -0.5x 1.5x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA – 7.6x 15.1x
EV/EBIT – 7.8x 17.0x
EV/Revenue 1.6x 6.4x 2.2x
EV/FCF – 15.2x -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 15.2x -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.99 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPFSIUSBUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.6% 6.7% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.1% 3.2% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) -51.9% 18.4% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 3.1% 12.1% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – 19.9% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 12.2% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 68.8% -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.9% -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 68.8% -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.9% -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPFSIUSBUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 85.2% 14.6%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 34.5% -3.2%
Net margin – 26.4% -1.0%
FCF margin – 42.3% -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin – 42.3% -135.9%
Return on equity 5.5% 12.2% -8.1%
Return on assets 0.8% 1.1% -0.6%
Return on invested capital – 12.6% 6.3%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.0x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.5x 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPFSIUSBUWMC
Debt / assets – 13.2% 33.5%
Debt / equity – 1.4x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.8x 10.6x
Debt / FCF – 7.7x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 85.4% 90.6% 94.5%
Equity / assets 14.6% 9.4% 5.5%
Interest coverage – 1.7x 0.8x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPFSIUSBUWMC
Dividend yield 1.9% 3.5% 20.3%
Net buyback yield – 0.7% –
Shareholder yield 1.9% 4.2% 20.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 39.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 25.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPFSIUSBUWMC
Forward P/E 14.0xFY2026 11.7xFY2026 7.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.61FY2026 $5.17FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -50.4%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +125.2% +18.8% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.30BFY2026 $30.11BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.1%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.3% +16.7% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPFSIUSBUWMC
Held by institutions 64.8% 81.6% 17.0%
Institutions holding 229 2,069 291
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.5% +2.1% +31.8%
Institutions buying 132 965 214
Institutions selling 66 761 50
Buyers to sellers 2.00 1.27 4.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PFSIUSBUWMC
PFSI 1.00 0.23 0.39
USB 0.23 1.00 0.19
UWMC 0.39 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PFSI, USB and UWMC?

Us Bancorp (USB) is the largest by market capitalisation: PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) $3.24B, Us Bancorp (USB) $92.39B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $529.91M.

Which stock is cheaper, PFSI, USB and UWMC?

PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 8.4x, Us Bancorp (USB) 11.8x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -14.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 14.0x, Us Bancorp (USB) 11.7x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 7.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

UWM Holdings (UWMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) +3.6%, Us Bancorp (USB) +6.7%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Us Bancorp (USB) has the highest net margin (Us Bancorp (USB) 26.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, Us Bancorp (USB) leads (Us Bancorp (USB) 12.6%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Us Bancorp (USB) returned the most: PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) -48.9%, Us Bancorp (USB) +30.0%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -73.8%. Over five years, PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) compounded fastest (PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) +0.8%/yr, Us Bancorp (USB) +0.1%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -26.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 0.00%, Us Bancorp (USB) 0.03%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 0.00%. PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) and UWM Holdings (UWMC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Us Bancorp (USB) has been the steadiest (PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI) 52.2%, Us Bancorp (USB) 22.2%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 80.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PFSI, USB and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Us Bancorp (USB) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.