PDFS vs QCOM vs DLB Stock Comparison

Pdf Solutions, Qualcomm and Dolby Laboratories Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AIP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PDFS Pdf Solutions Inc
$44.23 -10.7% 1M +54.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.85B
P/E
179.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$241.18M
Div. yield
–
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
4 wins
QCOM Qualcomm Inc/De
$184.17 -8.8% 1M -1.9% 1Y
Market cap
$191.72B
P/E
20.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$44.07B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor Design Technology
4 wins
DLB Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
$62.74 +7.0% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.75B
P/E
25.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.35B
Div. yield
0.02%
Semiconductor EDA Software Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Qualcomm leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Qualcomm 4, Dolby Laboratories 4, Pdf Solutions 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPDFSQCOMDLBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.85B $191.72B $5.75B QCOM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 179.5x 20.7x 25.4x QCOM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 32.5x 17.1x 14.0x DLB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.0% +1.9% +0.6% PDFS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.3% 21.0% 16.7% QCOM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 3.1% 20.5% — QCOM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.3x 0.4x — PDFS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.02% DLB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +54.0% -1.9% -7.2% PDFS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.9%/yr +6.6%/yr -6.4%/yr PDFS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 69.4% 53.0% 30.2% DLB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 61/100 66/100 DLB

Percentile Scorecard

PDFSQCOMDLB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPDFSQCOMDLB
Valuation 40 #57 of 94 80 #20 of 94 87 #13 of 94
Growth 86 #14 of 92 33 #62 of 92 25 #69 of 92
Profitability 43 #52 of 90 85 #14 of 90 72 #26 of 90
Financial Health 54 #46 of 99 28 #72 of 99 60 #40 of 99
Shareholder Returns 15 #62 of 73 79 #16 of 73 85 #12 of 73
Overall 48 61 66
  • PDFS ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • QCOM ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors
  • DLB ranked among 103 companies in Semiconductors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPDFSQCOMDLBSPY
1 month -10.7%-8.8%+7.0% -0.2%
3 months -0.8%+13.1%+19.5% +3.9%
6 months +10.3%+22.8%-0.3% +8.2%
Year to date +55.0%+7.7%-2.3% +12.9%
1 year +54.0%-1.9%-7.2% +12.3%
3 years +62.1%+73.0%-20.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +17.5%+20.1%-7.3% +23.3%
5 years +91.6%+37.8%-28.2% +67.9%
5 years, per year +13.9%+6.6%-6.4% +10.9%
10 years +129.8%+162.8%+29.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +8.7%+10.1%+2.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePDFSQCOMDLBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 69.4%53.0%30.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 71.6%52.5%31.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.082.070.54 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.78-0.04-0.24 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -65.5%-45.6%-49.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -37.5%-26.6%-9.2% -1.2%
52-week high $70.79$251.02$69.09 $779.14
52-week low $23.97$124.07$48.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePDFSQCOMDLB
P/E now vs peer median 175.6xmedian 45.6x 21.0xmedian 45.6x 26.1xmedian 45.6x
P/S now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 7.7x 4.4xmedian 7.7x 4.4xmedian 7.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 48.3xmedian 29.0x 16.9xmedian 29.0x 15.8xmedian 29.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1,026xmedian 40.6x 18.7xmedian 40.6x 15.1xmedian 40.6x
P/B now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 4.6x 7.0xmedian 4.6x 2.3xmedian 4.6x
PEG now vs peer median 83.48median 2.28 5.05median 2.28 12.55median 2.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPDFSQCOMDLB
Revenue $241.18M $44.07B $1.35B
Gross profit $172.35M $23.90B $1.19B
Operating income $19.66M $10.22B $239.10M
Net income $10.31M $9.26B $228.00M
Free cash flow -$1.81M $10.42B $392.67M
R&D $70.34M $9.89B $265.94M
EPS (diluted) $0.25 $8.66 $2.39
Cash & equivalents $114.88M $4.53B $669.39M
Total debt $66.52M $12.78B –
Shares (diluted) 41.78M 1.07B 94.52M
Enterprise value $1.63B $151.64B $3.14B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPDFSQCOMDLB
P/E 175.6x 21.0x 26.1x
P/FCF -1,026x 18.7x 15.1x
P/Operating cash flow 47.9x 15.7x 13.5x
P/S 7.7x 4.4x 4.4x
P/B 5.0x 7.0x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 5.7x 7.4x 2.7x
EV/EBITDA 48.3x 16.9x 15.8x
EV/EBIT 91.8x 19.5x 21.9x
EV/Revenue 7.5x 4.5x 3.9x
EV/FCF -999.7x 19.1x 13.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 46.6x 16.1x 12.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 83.48 5.05 12.55

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPDFSQCOMDLB
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.0% 1.9% 0.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.0% 4.5% 1.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.3% -0.8% -0.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 14.7% 3.2% 1.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 10,088% -15.0% -15.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 57.7% 0.6% -1.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 1,100% -20.0% -14.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 4.4% 2.4% 1.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 1,028% -17.8% -12.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.1% 4.2% 2.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 170.5% -2.1% -6.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 26.6% 12.7% 9.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 85.2% -10.4% -10.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.8% 14.9% 9.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPDFSQCOMDLB
Gross margin 71.5% 54.2% 87.6%
EBITDA margin 15.5% 26.8% 24.5%
Operating margin 8.2% 23.2% 17.7%
Pretax margin 6.9% 25.4% 20.4%
Net margin 4.3% 21.0% 16.7%
FCF margin -0.7% 23.6% 29.0%
Operating cash flow margin 16.0% 28.1% 32.3%
Return on equity 3.2% 33.7% 8.7%
Return on assets 2.2% 16.2% 7.1%
Return on invested capital 3.1% 20.5% –
Return on capital employed 4.9% 22.3% 8.6%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 3.8x 1.3x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 10.6% 7.4% 9.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPDFSQCOMDLB
Debt / assets 12.8% 22.3% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.5x –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.3x 0.4x –
Debt / FCF -36.9x 1.2x –
Liabilities / assets 28.3% 51.8% 17.9%
Equity / assets 71.7% 48.2% 82.1%
Interest coverage 4.3x 14.8x –
Current ratio 3.4x 2.0x 3.2x
Quick ratio 3.4x 1.1x 3.1x
Cash ratio 1.6x 0.7x 1.6x
Altman Z-score 8.35 6.20 8.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPDFSQCOMDLB
Dividend yield – 2.0% 2.3%
Net buyback yield -4.6% 4.5% 3.5%
Shareholder yield -4.6% 6.5% 5.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 41.3% 58.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 36.7% 34.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.8% 8.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 3.9% 9.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPDFSQCOMDLB
Forward P/E 32.5xFY2026 17.1xFY2026 14.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.36FY2026 $10.79FY2026 $4.49FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +44.7%FY2026 -10.3%FY2026 +5.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.9% -3.0% +4.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $273.57MFY2026 $45.55BFY2026 $1.50BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.9%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026 +11.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.8% -5.0% -7.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPDFSQCOMDLB
Held by institutions 93.0% 79.7% 100.0%
Institutions holding 283 3,030 389
Change in shares held, QoQ +20.8% +2.8% +5.8%
Institutions buying 191 1,416 195
Institutions selling 61 1,333 148
Buyers to sellers 3.13 1.06 1.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PDFSQCOMDLB
PDFS 1.00 0.46 0.09
QCOM 0.46 1.00 0.17
DLB 0.09 0.17 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PDFS, QCOM and DLB?

Qualcomm (QCOM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Pdf Solutions (PDFS) $1.85B, Qualcomm (QCOM) $191.72B, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) $5.75B.

Which stock is cheaper, PDFS, QCOM and DLB?

Qualcomm (QCOM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 179.5x, Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.7x, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 25.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) is cheapest (Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 32.5x, Qualcomm (QCOM) 17.1x, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 14.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Pdf Solutions (PDFS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Pdf Solutions (PDFS) +23.0%, Qualcomm (QCOM) +1.9%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) +0.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Qualcomm (QCOM) has the highest net margin (Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 4.3%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 21.0%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 16.7%). On return on invested capital, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads (Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 3.1%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 20.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Pdf Solutions (PDFS) returned the most: Pdf Solutions (PDFS) +54.0%, Qualcomm (QCOM) -1.9%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) -7.2%. Over five years, Pdf Solutions (PDFS) compounded fastest (Pdf Solutions (PDFS) +13.9%/yr, Qualcomm (QCOM) +6.6%/yr, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) -6.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Dolby Laboratories (DLB) has the highest dividend yield: Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 0.00%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 0.02%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 0.02%. Pdf Solutions (PDFS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) has been the steadiest (Pdf Solutions (PDFS) 69.4%, Qualcomm (QCOM) 53.0%, Dolby Laboratories (DLB) 30.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PDFS, QCOM and DLB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Qualcomm (QCOM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.