PC vs VVV vs BLMN Stock Comparison

Premium Catering (Holdings), Valvoline and Bloomin' Brands Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CAKE) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
VVV Valvoline Inc
$31.87 +10.2% 1M -5.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.07B
P/E
40.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.96B
Div. yield
–
Personal Services Consumer Discretionary
5 wins
BLMN Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
$9.08 +15.2% 1M +17.9% 1Y
Market cap
$777.38M
P/E
28.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.98B
Div. yield
–
Full-Service Restaurants Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Valvoline leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Valvoline 5, Bloomin' Brands 5, Premium Catering (Holdings) 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPCVVVBLMNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $274.48M $4.07B $777.38M VVV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 40.1x 28.1x BLMN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 18.7x 9.9x BLMN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +16.1% +1.2% VVV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 5.2% 0.7% VVV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 8.8% 4.2% VVV
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.4x 2.5x BLMN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% -5.1% +17.9% BLMN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -1.3%/yr -15.7%/yr VVV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 0.0% 34.6% 74.6% PC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 33/100 42/100 BLMN

Percentile Scorecard

PCVVVBLMN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPCVVVBLMN
Valuation – 19 #27 of 33 86 #8 of 50
Growth – 31 #21 of 30 33 #32 of 47
Profitability – 75 #8 of 29 44 #26 of 46
Financial Health 94 #4 of 51 8 #36 of 39 18 #42 of 51
Shareholder Returns – – 28 #24 of 33
Overall – 33 42
  • PC ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants
  • VVV ranked among 39 companies in Consumer Services
  • BLMN ranked among 53 companies in Restaurants

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPCVVVBLMNSPY
1 month 0.0%+10.2%+15.2% -0.2%
3 months 0.0%-20.7%+5.6% +3.9%
6 months 0.0%-1.6%+50.6% +8.2%
Year to date 0.0%+9.7%+47.2% +12.9%
1 year 0.0%-5.1%+17.9% +12.3%
3 years —+6.4%-60.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+2.1%-26.9% +23.3%
5 years —-6.2%-57.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-1.3%-15.7% +10.9%
10 years —+56.2%-46.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+4.6%-6.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasurePCVVVBLMNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 0.0%34.6%74.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —34.0%63.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.000.571.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.150.24 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -87.3%-44.1%-82.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-20.9%-23.4% -1.2%
52-week high $9.40$40.28$11.85 $779.14
52-week low $9.40$26.62$5.26 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePCVVVBLMN
P/E now vs peer median —median 20.6x 40.1xmedian 15.2x 28.1xmedian 20.6x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.2x 2.1xmedian 1.3x 0.2xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.3x 12.6xmedian 9.8x 5.6xmedian 13.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 17.3x 28.9xmedian 14.5x 5.0xmedian 17.3x
P/B now vs peer median 28.0xmedian 3.1x 9.8xmedian 2.0x 1.8xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.07 -0.71median 0.35 -0.56median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPCVVVBLMN
Revenue – $1.96B $3.98B
Gross profit – $751.90M $2.79B
Operating income – $301.00M $47.65M
Net income – $101.50M $32.19M
Free cash flow – $140.50M $155.17M
EPS (diluted) – $0.79 $0.32
Cash & equivalents $971.86K $84.20M $66.61M
Total debt – $1.60B $702.79M
Shares (diluted) 29.20M 128.40M 86.22M
Enterprise value $270.03M $3.78B $516.76M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPCVVVBLMN
P/E – 40.1x 28.1x
P/FCF – 28.9x 5.0x
P/Operating cash flow – 9.9x 2.4x
P/S – 2.1x 0.2x
P/B 28.0x 9.8x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 28.0x 9.8x 66.4x
EV/EBITDA – 12.6x 5.6x
EV/EBIT – 18.6x 29.7x
EV/Revenue – 2.8x 0.4x
EV/FCF – 39.7x 9.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – 13.6x 4.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.71 -0.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPCVVVBLMN
Revenue growth (1Y) – 16.1% 1.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 12.2% 0.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 15.4% 0.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 12.7% 1.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -31.6% -57.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 7.2% -45.7%
Net income growth (1Y) – -63.5% 2,049%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -59.5% -49.9%
EPS growth (1Y) – -63.5% 648.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -56.2% -50.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 40.6% 36.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 6.3% -11.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 129.6% 305.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -7.0% -8.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPCVVVBLMN
Gross margin – 38.3% 70.1%
EBITDA margin – 22.6% 6.3%
Operating margin – 15.3% 1.2%
Pretax margin – 9.0% 0.0%
Net margin – 5.2% 0.7%
FCF margin – 7.2% 3.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 21.0% 8.0%
Return on equity – 26.4% 7.9%
Return on assets – 2.9% 1.1%
Return on invested capital – 8.8% 4.2%
Return on capital employed – 9.9% 2.1%
Asset turnover – 0.6x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 4.1x 9.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.6% 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPCVVVBLMN
Debt / assets – 46.0% 22.5%
Debt / equity – 3.8x 1.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.4x 2.5x
Debt / FCF – 11.4x 4.5x
Liabilities / assets 13.7% 88.0% 86.0%
Equity / assets 86.3% 12.0% 14.0%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 9.6x 0.7x 0.3x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.5x 0.1x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score – 1.74 0.89

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPCVVVBLMN
Dividend yield – – 0.0%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 39.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 8.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – -80.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -42.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPCVVVBLMN
Forward P/E – 18.7xFY2026 9.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $1.70FY2026 $0.92FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +6.9%FY2026 -18.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.0% +16.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.98BFY2026 $3.75BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +16.0%FY2026 -5.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +23.4% +3.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPCVVVBLMN
Held by institutions – 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 450 234
Change in shares held, QoQ – -0.1% +6.7%
Institutions buying – 234 123
Institutions selling – 143 76
Buyers to sellers – 1.64 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PCVVVBLMN
PC – – –
VVV – 1.00 0.29
BLMN – 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PC, VVV and BLMN?

Valvoline (VVV) is the largest by market capitalisation: Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) $274.48M, Valvoline (VVV) $4.07B, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) $777.38M.

Which stock is cheaper, PC, VVV and BLMN?

Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Valvoline (VVV) 40.1x, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 28.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) is cheapest (Valvoline (VVV) 18.7x, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 9.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Valvoline (VVV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Valvoline (VVV) +16.1%, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) +1.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Valvoline (VVV) has the highest net margin (Valvoline (VVV) 5.2%, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 0.7%). On return on invested capital, Valvoline (VVV) leads (Valvoline (VVV) 8.8%, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 4.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) returned the most: Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%, Valvoline (VVV) -5.1%, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) +17.9%. Over five years, Valvoline (VVV) compounded fastest (Valvoline (VVV) -1.3%/yr, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) -15.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) has been the steadiest (Premium Catering (Holdings) (PC) 0.0%, Valvoline (VVV) 34.6%, Bloomin' Brands (BLMN) 74.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PC, VVV and BLMN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Valvoline (VVV) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.