PARA vs PERF vs SSYS Stock Comparison

Parabolic Technologies, Perfect and Stratasys Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SBET) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PERF Perfect Corp.
$2.00 +4.2% 1M +1.0% 1Y
Market cap
$170.12M
P/E
35.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$71.07M
Div. yield
–
Creative Software Technology
7 wins
SSYS Stratasys Ltd.
$6.11 -28.6% 1M -38.0% 1Y
Market cap
$526.13M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$547.27M
Div. yield
–
3D Printing Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Perfect leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Perfect 7, Stratasys 2, Parabolic Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPARAPERFSSYSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $56.82K $170.12M $526.13M SSYS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 0.0x 35.3x -10.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 28.6x 61.1x PERF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +19.6% +10.4% -3.1% PARA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -228.7% 8.1% -8.4% PERF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -113.0% 0.8% — PERF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x -67.9x — PERF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -99.6% +1.0% -38.0% PERF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -93.1%/yr — -29.3%/yr SSYS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 372.4% 47.8% 48.6% PERF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 24/100 64/100 38/100 PERF

Percentile Scorecard

PARAPERFSSYS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPARAPERFSSYS
Valuation 27 #73 of 100 82 #6 of 29 36 #131 of 204
Growth 37 #63 of 99 33 #19 of 28 22 #149 of 191
Profitability 7 #89 of 96 46 #15 of 27 14 #163 of 189
Financial Health 25 #84 of 112 93 #3 of 31 79 #47 of 221
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 24 64 38
  • PARA ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • PERF ranked among 31 companies in Workplace Software
  • SSYS ranked among 223 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPARAPERFSSYSSPY
1 month -76.1%+4.2%-28.6% -5.9%
3 months -91.6%+4.2%-30.2% -4.6%
6 months -97.5%+22.0%-25.5% +0.2%
Year to date -99.2%+10.5%-29.6% +7.5%
1 year -99.6%+1.0%-38.0% +8.2%
3 years -100.0%-27.3%-44.8% +68.3%
3 years, per year -98.9%-10.1%-18.0% +19.0%
5 years -100.0%—-82.4% +56.5%
5 years, per year -93.1%—-29.3% +9.4%
10 years ——-66.6% +251.5%
10 years, per year ——-10.4% +13.4%

Risk

MeasurePARAPERFSSYSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 372.4%47.8%48.6% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 347.7%47.4%48.5% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.700.222.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.270.02-0.78 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-88.2%-83.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -99.6%-4.3%-47.4% -5.9%
52-week high $38.80$2.09$11.62 $779.14
52-week low $0.16$1.30$6.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePARAPERFSSYS
P/E now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 24.7x 35.3xmedian 34.8x -10.9xmedian 23.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 2.8x 2.4xmedian 2.1x 1.0xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 16.5x 7.0xmedian 11.9x -8.0xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 15.3x 15.6xmedian 13.6x -22.6xmedian 21.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.0xmedian 2.7x 1.1xmedian 3.1x 0.6xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.00median 0.77 1.33median 0.73 -24.98median 1.02

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPARAPERFSSYS
Revenue $10.62M $71.07M $547.27M
Gross profit $8.63M $56.66M $221.15M
Operating income -$18.88M $1.26M -$83.46M
Net income -$24.30M $8.43M -$115.18M
Free cash flow -$16.08M $10.88M -$23.24M
R&D – $14.93M $77.20M
EPS (diluted) $-149.36 $0.06 $-0.56
Cash & equivalents $646.00K $125.62M $92.53M
Total debt $5.51M $7.81M –
Shares (diluted) 162.70K 101.85M 82.30M
Enterprise value -$1.84M -$417.85M -$423.68M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPARAPERFSSYS
P/E 0.0x 35.3x -10.9x
P/FCF 0.0x 15.6x -22.6x
P/Operating cash flow 0.0x 16.2x -114.8x
P/S 0.0x 2.4x 1.0x
P/B 0.0x 1.1x 0.6x
P/Tangible book 0.0x 1.1x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA -0.3x 7.0x -8.0x
EV/EBIT -0.3x 12.6x -3.8x
EV/Revenue 0.5x 0.2x 0.6x
EV/FCF -0.3x 1.5x -13.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -0.3x 1.5x -68.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.00 1.33 -24.98

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPARAPERFSSYS
Revenue growth (1Y) 19.6% 10.4% -3.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 13.4% -4.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.0% 14.5% -12.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 12.4% -6.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -14.9% 157.8% -30.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -23.4% 26.4% -9.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 30.2% 37.7% -17.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 26.9% -37.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 95.9% -1.4% 59.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 37.1% 26.4% 0.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -8.8% -32.0% -172.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -22.2% – 61.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -8.8% -31.0% -116.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -22.2% – 36.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPARAPERFSSYS
Gross margin 81.2% 79.7% 40.4%
EBITDA margin -166.3% 3.2% -7.2%
Operating margin -177.7% 1.8% -15.3%
Pretax margin -227.9% 10.0% -13.1%
Net margin -228.7% 8.1% -8.4%
FCF margin -151.4% 15.3% -4.2%
Operating cash flow margin -151.4% 14.8% -0.8%
Return on equity -239.1% 5.4% -14.0%
Return on assets -77.4% 4.3% -10.9%
Return on invested capital -113.0% 0.8% –
Return on capital employed -141.2% 0.8% -9.3%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.4x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x 1.2x 0.0x
Stock comp / revenue 38.3% 1.1% 4.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPARAPERFSSYS
Debt / assets 17.6% 4.0% –
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x -67.9x –
Debt / FCF -0.3x 0.7x –
Liabilities / assets 60.9% 19.4% 22.0%
Equity / assets 39.1% 80.6% 78.0%
Interest coverage -4.6x 66.4x –
Current ratio 0.1x 4.6x 3.5x
Quick ratio 0.1x 4.6x 2.3x
Cash ratio 0.0x 4.4x 1.3x
Altman Z-score -7.38 1.28 -1.21

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPARAPERFSSYS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -11,039% – –
Shareholder yield -11,039% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPARAPERFSSYS
Forward P/E – 28.6xFY2026 61.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-81.25FY2026 $0.07FY2026 $0.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +40.0%FY2026 -33.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +14.3% +100.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $14.14MFY2026 $76.52MFY2026 $582.47MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.3%FY2026 +10.7%FY2026 +5.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +53.6% +8.1% +6.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPARAPERFSSYS
Held by institutions 0.1% – 50.8%
Institutions holding 1 – 150
Change in shares held, QoQ – – +7.3%
Institutions buying 1 – 79
Institutions selling 0 – 29
Buyers to sellers – – 2.72

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PARAPERFSSYS
PARA 1.00 0.06 0.13
PERF 0.06 1.00 -0.02
SSYS 0.13 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PARA, PERF and SSYS?

Stratasys (SSYS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Parabolic Technologies (PARA) $56.82K, Perfect (PERF) $170.12M, Stratasys (SSYS) $526.13M.

Which company is growing faster?

Parabolic Technologies (PARA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Parabolic Technologies (PARA) +19.6%, Perfect (PERF) +10.4%, Stratasys (SSYS) -3.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Perfect (PERF) has the highest net margin (Parabolic Technologies (PARA) -228.7%, Perfect (PERF) 8.1%, Stratasys (SSYS) -8.4%). On return on invested capital, Perfect (PERF) leads (Parabolic Technologies (PARA) -113.0%, Perfect (PERF) 0.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Perfect (PERF) returned the most: Parabolic Technologies (PARA) -99.6%, Perfect (PERF) +1.0%, Stratasys (SSYS) -38.0%. Over five years, Stratasys (SSYS) compounded fastest (Parabolic Technologies (PARA) -93.1%/yr, Stratasys (SSYS) -29.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Perfect (PERF) has been the steadiest (Parabolic Technologies (PARA) 372.4%, Perfect (PERF) 47.8%, Stratasys (SSYS) 48.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PARA, PERF and SSYS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Perfect (PERF) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.