PANW vs CRWD vs FTNT Stock Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Holdings and Fortinet Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GEN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
PANW Palo Alto Networks Inc
$351.72 -12.8% 1M +59.7% 1Y
Market cap
$261.74B
P/E
852.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.48B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
4 wins
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$126.21 -30.3% 1M +46.0% 1Y
Market cap
$94.44B
P/E
41.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.88B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fortinet leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Fortinet 6, Palo Alto Networks 4, CrowdStrike Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPANWCRWDFTNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $261.74B $247.72B $94.44B PANW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 852.6x 4,237x 41.4x FTNT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 80.1x 184.0x 35.8x FTNT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.5% +24.3% +18.8% PANW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.7% 1.1% 28.2% FTNT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -2.1% 111.7% FTNT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -6.5x -1.2x CRWD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +59.7% -55.5% +46.0% PANW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +33.5%/yr -2.2%/yr +13.9%/yr PANW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.2% 150.8% 49.5% FTNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 58/100 71/100 FTNT

Percentile Scorecard

PANWCRWDFTNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPANWCRWDFTNT
Valuation 42 #72 of 124 21 #98 of 124 55 #56 of 124
Growth 37 #72 of 113 88 #15 of 113 63 #43 of 113
Profitability 74 #29 of 110 67 #37 of 110 100 #1 of 110
Financial Health 38 #81 of 129 62 #50 of 129 54 #60 of 129
Shareholder Returns 53 #32 of 67 55 #31 of 67 83 #12 of 67
Overall 49 58 71
  • PANW ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • CRWD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FTNT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPANWCRWDFTNTSPY
1 month -12.8%-10.5%-30.3% -2.3%
3 months +1.3%+19.4%-22.7% -0.7%
6 months +90.6%-48.5%+41.4% +4.8%
Year to date +90.9%-48.4%+58.9% +10.3%
1 year +59.7%-55.5%+46.0% +10.3%
3 years +188.9%+28.5%+150.0% +73.0%
3 years, per year +42.5%+8.7%+35.8% +20.1%
5 years +322.9%-10.7%+91.3% +61.9%
5 years, per year +33.5%-2.2%+13.9% +10.1%
10 years +1,337.4%—+1,929.1% +258.6%
10 years, per year +30.5%—+35.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasurePANWCRWDFTNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.2%150.8%49.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.5%207.6%52.0% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.301.721.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.19-0.370.93 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.0%-77.1%-38.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.2%-69.1%-35.2% -3.5%
52-week high $419.91$782.17$194.75 $779.14
52-week low $141.67$179.38$75.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePANWCRWDFTNT
P/E now vs peer median 858.1xmedian 35.6x 4,217xmedian 35.6x 43.6xmedian 35.6x
P/S now vs peer median 25.0xmedian 4.2x 45.9xmedian 4.2x 12.3xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 132.5xmedian 30.0x 368.9xmedian 30.0x 30.0xmedian 30.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 69.7xmedian 25.2x 153.9xmedian 25.2x 29.7xmedian 25.2x
P/B now vs peer median 10.4xmedian 3.2x 48.2xmedian 3.2x 59.7xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -59.29median 1.21 113.50median 1.21 1.50median 1.21

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPANWCRWDFTNT
Revenue $11.48B $5.40B $7.88B
Gross profit $8.08B $4.06B $6.29B
Operating income $695.00M -$119.49M $2.60B
Net income $307.00M $77.40M $2.28B
Free cash flow $4.11B $1.61B $3.43B
R&D $2.55B $1.56B $857.40M
EPS (diluted) $0.40 $0.06 $3.07
Cash & equivalents $2.51B $5.01B $3.75B
Total debt – $746.22M $497.10M
Shares (diluted) 764.00M 1.04B 742.60M
Enterprise value $246.81B $228.12B $78.69B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPANWCRWDFTNT
P/E 858.1x 4,217x 43.6x
P/FCF 69.7x 153.9x 29.7x
P/Operating cash flow 63.0x 122.8x 27.3x
P/S 25.0x 45.9x 12.3x
P/B 10.4x 48.2x 59.7x
P/Tangible book 14.0x 50.9x 62.8x
EV/EBITDA 132.5x 368.9x 30.0x
EV/EBIT 408.0x -2,036x 36.4x
EV/Revenue 24.7x 45.1x 11.8x
EV/FCF 68.9x 151.3x 28.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 62.3x 120.7x 26.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -59.29 113.50 1.50

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPANWCRWDFTNT
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.5% 24.3% 18.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 18.5% 26.9% 14.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.3% 26.2% 17.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 17.5% 27.6% 16.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) -44.1% 66.9% 24.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.5% 7.9% 27.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -72.9% 127.3% 9.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -11.3% 41.4% 26.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -74.9% 120.0% 14.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -14.5% 37.2% 29.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 22.5% 45.2% 41.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.9% 23.8% 15.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 18.6% 45.4% 53.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.1% 24.1% 16.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPANWCRWDFTNT
Gross margin 70.4% 75.2% 80.2%
EBITDA margin 18.6% 12.2% 39.4%
Operating margin 6.1% -2.2% 32.4%
Pretax margin 4.7% 1.4% 34.8%
Net margin 2.7% 1.1% 28.2%
FCF margin 35.8% 29.8% 41.4%
Operating cash flow margin 39.7% 37.4% 45.1%
Return on equity 1.1% 1.6% 166.9%
Return on assets 0.6% 0.7% 20.4%
Return on invested capital – -2.1% 111.7%
Return on capital employed 1.9% -1.7% 44.2%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 14.8x 26.1x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 15.5% 23.1% 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPANWCRWDFTNT
Debt / assets – 6.2% 4.6%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – -6.5x -1.2x
Debt / FCF – 0.5x 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 43.3% 57.3% 85.7%
Equity / assets 56.7% 42.7% 14.3%
Interest coverage – -4.5x 135.7x
Current ratio 0.9x 1.6x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.4x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.3x 1.1x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 8.54 22.10 7.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPANWCRWDFTNT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.1% 0.0% 3.0%
Shareholder yield -0.1% 0.0% 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPANWCRWDFTNT
Forward P/E 80.1xFY2027 184.0xFY2026 35.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.37FY2027 $1.33FY2026 $3.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +13.8%FY2027 +43.0%FY2026 +29.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +16.5% +23.3% +0.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $13.37BFY2027 $6.28BFY2026 $8.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.5%FY2027 +30.5%FY2026 +23.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.7% +22.3% +13.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPANWCRWDFTNT
Held by institutions 82.1% 77.4% 68.6%
Institutions holding 2,917 2,435 1,569
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.6% +12.2% +23.7%
Institutions buying 1,548 1,375 854
Institutions selling 1,127 839 551
Buyers to sellers 1.37 1.64 1.55

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PANWCRWDFTNT
PANW 1.00 0.34 0.71
CRWD 0.34 1.00 0.29
FTNT 0.71 0.29 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PANW, CRWD and FTNT?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Palo Alto Networks (PANW) $261.74B, CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) $247.72B, Fortinet (FTNT) $94.44B.

Which stock is cheaper, PANW, CRWD and FTNT?

Fortinet (FTNT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 852.6x, CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 4,237x, Fortinet (FTNT) 41.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fortinet (FTNT) is cheapest (Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 80.1x, CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 184.0x, Fortinet (FTNT) 35.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +24.5%, CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) +24.3%, Fortinet (FTNT) +18.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortinet (FTNT) has the highest net margin (Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 2.7%, CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 1.1%, Fortinet (FTNT) 28.2%). On return on invested capital, Fortinet (FTNT) leads (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) -2.1%, Fortinet (FTNT) 111.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Palo Alto Networks (PANW) returned the most: Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +59.7%, CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) -55.5%, Fortinet (FTNT) +46.0%. Over five years, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) compounded fastest (Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +33.5%/yr, CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) -2.2%/yr, Fortinet (FTNT) +13.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortinet (FTNT) has been the steadiest (Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 50.2%, CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 150.8%, Fortinet (FTNT) 49.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PANW, CRWD and FTNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortinet (FTNT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.