PAHC vs ZOMDF vs ELAN Stock Comparison

Phibro Animal Health, Zomedica and Elanco Animal Health Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BFLY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ZOMDF Zomedica Corp.
$0.09 +12.5% 1M +12.5% 1Y
Market cap
$92.41M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$38.68M
Div. yield
–
Animal Health Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Phibro Animal Health leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Phibro Animal Health 5, Zomedica 3, Elanco Animal Health 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPAHCZOMDFELANLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.34B $92.41M $12.80B ELAN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.1x -5.8x -64.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 10.4x — 21.7x PAHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.1% +31.3% +12.0% ZOMDF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.7% -41.4% -4.0% PAHC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.9% — 6.1% PAHC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x — 2.5x PAHC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -14.0% +12.5% +9.6% ZOMDF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.6%/yr -29.9%/yr -7.0%/yr PAHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 56.6% 104.0% 42.8% ELAN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 76/100 66/100 ZOMDF

Percentile Scorecard

PAHCZOMDFELAN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPAHCZOMDFELAN
Valuation 94 #38 of 634 75 #161 of 634 94 #42 of 634
Growth 85 #90 of 608 80 #121 of 608 55 #272 of 608
Profitability 85 #86 of 557 74 #147 of 557 84 #92 of 557
Financial Health 27 #476 of 654 74 #174 of 654 31 #455 of 654
Shareholder Returns 57 #175 of 403 – –
Overall 70 76 66
  • PAHC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ZOMDF ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ELAN ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPAHCZOMDFELANSPY
1 month -3.3%+12.5%+5.2% -5.9%
3 months -0.3%0.0%-2.1% -4.6%
6 months -18.0%-10.0%-1.4% +0.2%
Year to date -5.2%-10.0%+4.6% +7.5%
1 year -14.0%+12.5%+9.6% +8.2%
3 years +189.5%-52.6%+152.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year +42.5%-22.1%+36.3% +19.0%
5 years +58.2%-83.0%-30.6% +56.5%
5 years, per year +9.6%-29.9%-7.0% +9.4%
10 years +35.1%—— +251.5%
10 years, per year +3.1%—— +13.4%

Risk

MeasurePAHCZOMDFELANSPY
Volatility, 1Y 56.6%104.0%42.8% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 61.6%161.8%43.7% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.940.131.31 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.250.120.22 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -57.9%-94.8%-75.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -40.6%-40.0%-11.8% -5.9%
52-week high $59.58$0.15$26.84 $779.14
52-week low $28.52$0.07$19.80 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePAHCZOMDFELAN
P/E now vs peer median 14.0xmedian 17.8x -5.5xmedian 17.8x -59.4xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 8.1x 2.3xmedian 8.1x 2.4xmedian 8.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 15.7x -4.8xmedian 15.7x 11.4xmedian 15.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 66.3xmedian 21.0x -7.4xmedian 21.0x 31.2xmedian 21.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 2.0x 0.8xmedian 2.0x 1.8xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median 0.20median 0.36 2.38median 0.36 3.02median 0.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPAHCZOMDFELAN
Revenue $1.54B $38.68M $5.02B
Gross profit $521.27M $24.74M $2.78B
Operating income $192.78M -$17.57M $637.00M
Net income $102.71M -$16.00M -$199.00M
Free cash flow $21.67M -$11.92M $379.00M
R&D – $5.07M $371.00M
EPS (diluted) $2.51 $-0.02 $-0.39
Cash & equivalents $75.55M $7.28M $530.00M
Total debt $610.88M – $3.92B
Shares (diluted) 40.96M 979.95M 505.90M
Enterprise value $1.02B -$92.61M $10.79B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPAHCZOMDFELAN
P/E 14.0x -5.5x -59.4x
P/FCF 66.3x -7.4x 31.2x
P/Operating cash flow 16.8x -7.7x 19.2x
P/S 0.9x 2.3x 2.4x
P/B 3.4x 0.8x 1.8x
P/Tangible book 3.7x 1.3x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA 7.7x -4.8x 11.4x
EV/EBIT 10.2x -2.7x 23.9x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 1.2x 3.0x
EV/FCF 90.7x -4.0x 40.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.9x -4.2x 24.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.20 2.38 3.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPAHCZOMDFELAN
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.1% 31.3% 12.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.4% 17.2% 5.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.5% 23.3% 13.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 20.6% 14.6% 3.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.8% 79.9% 22.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 49.7% 11.5% 59.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 51.5% 81.1% -145.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 70.5% -2.3% -20.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 51.2% 81.1% -145.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 69.8% -2.3% -19.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 11.6% 46.1% 7.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.7% 4.9% 73.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -36.8% 46.6% 5.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 74.0% 20.1% 101.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPAHCZOMDFELAN
Gross margin 33.8% 64.0% 55.4%
EBITDA margin 16.5% -26.1% 26.5%
Operating margin 12.5% -45.4% 12.7%
Pretax margin 9.1% -41.7% -3.3%
Net margin 6.7% -41.4% -4.0%
FCF margin 1.4% -30.8% 7.5%
Operating cash flow margin 5.6% -29.7% 12.3%
Return on equity 25.6% -15.1% -3.0%
Return on assets 6.8% -13.7% -1.5%
Return on invested capital 13.9% – 6.1%
Return on capital employed 15.9% -16.3% 5.5%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.3x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.8x 0.7x -3.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 3.6% 1.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPAHCZOMDFELAN
Debt / assets 40.3% – 28.9%
Debt / equity 1.5x – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x – 2.5x
Debt / FCF 28.2x – 10.3x
Liabilities / assets 72.4% 9.3% 51.4%
Equity / assets 27.6% 90.7% 48.6%
Interest coverage 4.2x – 2.6x
Current ratio 3.2x 6.1x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.0x 5.2x 0.9x
Cash ratio 0.3x 4.4x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 3.09 1.45 1.50

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPAHCZOMDFELAN
Dividend yield 1.4% – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 1.4% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) 19.0% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 89.9% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 0.1% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 0.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPAHCZOMDFELAN
Forward P/E 10.4xFY2027 – 21.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.42FY2027 $-0.03FY2026 $1.09FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +6.2%FY2027 – +16.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.6% – +23.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.53BFY2027 $46.29MFY2026 $4.79BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.6%FY2027 +44.5%FY2026 +1.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.2% +31.6% +19.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPAHCZOMDFELAN
Held by institutions 99.1% 0.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 210 6 526
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.0% -98.8% +4.4%
Institutions buying 117 2 246
Institutions selling 75 0 211
Buyers to sellers 1.56 – 1.17

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PAHCZOMDFELAN
PAHC 1.00 0.00 0.52
ZOMDF 0.00 1.00 0.02
ELAN 0.52 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PAHC, ZOMDF and ELAN?

Elanco Animal Health (ELAN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) $1.34B, Zomedica (ZOMDF) $92.41M, Elanco Animal Health (ELAN) $12.80B.

Which company is growing faster?

Zomedica (ZOMDF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +10.1%, Zomedica (ZOMDF) +31.3%, Elanco Animal Health (ELAN) +12.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) has the highest net margin (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 6.7%, Zomedica (ZOMDF) -41.4%, Elanco Animal Health (ELAN) -4.0%). On return on invested capital, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 13.9%, Elanco Animal Health (ELAN) 6.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zomedica (ZOMDF) returned the most: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) -14.0%, Zomedica (ZOMDF) +12.5%, Elanco Animal Health (ELAN) +9.6%. Over five years, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) compounded fastest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +9.6%/yr, Zomedica (ZOMDF) -29.9%/yr, Elanco Animal Health (ELAN) -7.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 0.01%, Zomedica (ZOMDF) 0.00%, Elanco Animal Health (ELAN) 0.00%. Zomedica (ZOMDF) and Elanco Animal Health (ELAN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Elanco Animal Health (ELAN) has been the steadiest (Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 56.6%, Zomedica (ZOMDF) 104.0%, Elanco Animal Health (ELAN) 42.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PAHC, ZOMDF and ELAN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.