PAAS vs AG vs NEWP Stock Comparison

Pan American Silver, First Majestic Silver and New Pacific Metals Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SVM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Pan American Silver leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Pan American Silver 5, First Majestic Silver 5, New Pacific Metals 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPAASAGNEWPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $17.49B $7.57B $1.03B PAAS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10,076x 21.2x -206.1x AG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.0x 19.0x — PAAS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.2% +98.5% — AG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.0% 21.2% — AG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 12.0% — AG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -4.3x -0.9x — PAAS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.64% 0.39% — PAAS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.9% +33.2% +166.8% NEWP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +9.8%/yr +2.8%/yr +9.9%/yr NEWP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 58.8% 74.1% 81.8% PAAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 74/100 46/100 AG

Percentile Scorecard

PAASAGNEWP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPAASAGNEWP
Valuation 58 #72 of 168 78 #38 of 168 46 #92 of 168
Growth 86 #22 of 152 99 #2 of 152 57 #66 of 152
Profitability 50 #62 of 123 85 #19 of 123 –
Financial Health 86 #24 of 165 71 #48 of 165 –
Shareholder Returns 52 #57 of 117 37 #74 of 117 36 #75 of 117
Overall 66 74 46
  • PAAS ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • AG ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • NEWP ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPAASAGNEWPSPY
1 month -8.5%-12.1%-10.9% -1.0%
3 months -14.1%-12.5%-6.4% -0.4%
6 months -26.7%-27.3%-6.3% +4.5%
Year to date -20.0%-7.6%+58.1% +12.4%
1 year +24.9%+33.2%+166.8% +13.6%
3 years +170.3%+217.5%+234.3% +76.4%
3 years, per year +39.3%+47.0%+49.6% +20.8%
5 years +59.6%+14.8%+59.9% +63.7%
5 years, per year +9.8%+2.8%+9.9% +10.4%
10 years +151.3%+82.9%+1,581.8% +267.7%
10 years, per year +9.7%+6.2%+32.6% +13.9%

Risk

MeasurePAASAGNEWPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 58.8%74.1%81.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 61.0%74.5%80.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.162.903.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.420.452.04 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -59.2%-70.5%-78.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -39.6%-51.9%-24.7% -1.6%
52-week high $68.70$32.01$7.37 $779.14
52-week low $33.20$10.67$2.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePAASAGNEWP
P/E now vs peer median 10,076xmedian 13.4x 21.2xmedian 13.4x -206.1xmedian 13.4x
P/S now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 3.0x 4.6xmedian 3.0x —median 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 45.1xmedian 7.7x 6.5xmedian 7.7x —median 7.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 13.3x 12.3xmedian 13.3x -161.8xmedian 13.3x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 2.3x 2.2xmedian 2.3x 6.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 386.10median 0.19 0.46median 0.19 -11.25median 0.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPAASAGNEWP
Revenue $3.46B $1.64B –
Gross profit $1.18B $827.10M –
Operating income $2.08M $756.62M –
Net income $1.12B $421.54M -$4.86M
Free cash flow $1.53B $617.41M -$6.35M
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $0.72 $-0.03
Cash & equivalents $1.51B $1.09B –
Total debt $2.00M $302.75M –
Shares (diluted) 381.58M 484.56M 180.60M
Enterprise value $11.71B $4.04B $1.03B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPAASAGNEWP
P/E 10,076x 21.2x -206.1x
P/FCF 11.5x 12.3x -161.8x
P/Operating cash flow 14.5x 9.2x -328.2x
P/S 5.1x 4.6x –
P/B 2.4x 2.2x 6.5x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 2.2x 6.5x
EV/EBITDA 45.1x 6.5x –
EV/EBIT 7,689x 8.8x –
EV/Revenue 4.6x 4.0x –
EV/FCF 10.5x 10.7x -161.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 13.3x 8.0x -328.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 386.10 0.46 -11.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPAASAGNEWP
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.2% 98.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 19.6% 39.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 15.1% 335.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 118.7% 283.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 112.6% 622.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 179.0% 78.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 111.9% 517.9% -48.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 69.4% 98.2% 14.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 135.9% 294.7% -42.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.1% 46.6% 18.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 283.0% 207.8% 4.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 131.1% 11.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 185.9% 232.3% 2.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 66.2% 80.3% 37.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPAASAGNEWP
Gross margin 34.0% 50.4% –
EBITDA margin 10.2% 62.2% –
Operating margin 0.1% 46.1% –
Pretax margin 0.1% 46.5% –
Net margin 0.0% 21.2% –
FCF margin 44.2% 37.6% –
Operating cash flow margin 34.8% 50.3% –
Return on equity 0.0% 12.2% -3.1%
Return on assets 0.0% 8.4% –
Return on invested capital 0.0% 12.0% –
Return on capital employed 0.0% 17.5% –
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 2.0x 0.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPAASAGNEWP
Debt / assets 0.0% 6.1% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA -4.3x -0.9x –
Debt / FCF 0.0x 0.5x –
Liabilities / assets 27.3% 31.7% –
Equity / assets 72.7% 68.3% –
Interest coverage 22.1x 34.3x –
Current ratio 14.1x 2.6x 23.5x
Quick ratio 2.3x 2.3x –
Cash ratio 2.1x 2.2x –
Altman Z-score 5.24 3.86 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPAASAGNEWP
Dividend yield 1.6% 0.4% –
Net buyback yield -2.7% -1.0% -2.9%
Shareholder yield -1.1% -0.6% -2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPAASAGNEWP
Forward P/E 13.0xFY2026 19.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.18FY2026 $0.81FY2026 $-0.03FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +25.7%FY2026 +76.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +32.1% +17.3% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.51BFY2026 $1.58BFY2026 $0.00FY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +24.9%FY2026 +25.6%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +12.8% +8.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPAASAGNEWP
Held by institutions 56.5% 47.0% –
Institutions holding 586 348 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.0% -4.4% –
Institutions buying 269 194 –
Institutions selling 199 104 –
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.87 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PAASAGNEWP
PAAS 1.00 0.91 0.78
AG 0.91 1.00 0.80
NEWP 0.78 0.80 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, PAAS, AG and NEWP?

Pan American Silver (PAAS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Pan American Silver (PAAS) $17.49B, First Majestic Silver (AG) $7.57B, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) $1.03B.

Which stock is cheaper, PAAS, AG and NEWP?

First Majestic Silver (AG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Pan American Silver (PAAS) 10,076x, First Majestic Silver (AG) 21.2x, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) -206.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Pan American Silver (PAAS) is cheapest (Pan American Silver (PAAS) 13.0x, First Majestic Silver (AG) 19.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

First Majestic Silver (AG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Pan American Silver (PAAS) +6.2%, First Majestic Silver (AG) +98.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

First Majestic Silver (AG) has the highest net margin (Pan American Silver (PAAS) 0.0%, First Majestic Silver (AG) 21.2%). On return on invested capital, First Majestic Silver (AG) leads (Pan American Silver (PAAS) 0.0%, First Majestic Silver (AG) 12.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year New Pacific Metals (NEWP) returned the most: Pan American Silver (PAAS) +24.9%, First Majestic Silver (AG) +33.2%, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) +166.8%. Over five years, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) compounded fastest (Pan American Silver (PAAS) +9.8%/yr, First Majestic Silver (AG) +2.8%/yr, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) +9.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Pan American Silver (PAAS) has the highest dividend yield: Pan American Silver (PAAS) 1.64%, First Majestic Silver (AG) 0.39%. New Pacific Metals (NEWP) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Pan American Silver (PAAS) has been the steadiest (Pan American Silver (PAAS) 58.8%, First Majestic Silver (AG) 74.1%, New Pacific Metals (NEWP) 81.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, PAAS, AG and NEWP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Pan American Silver (PAAS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.