P vs SMCI vs NTAP Stock Comparison

Everpure, Super Micro Computer and NetApp Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
P Everpure, Inc.
$131.41 +4.3% 1M +40.1% 1Y
Market cap
$46.26B
P/E
182.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.26B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
1 win
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc.
$32.69 -24.4% 1M -32.3% 1Y
Market cap
$21.14B
P/E
9.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$39.06B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
5 wins
NTAP NetApp, Inc.
$222.08 +10.4% 1M +90.4% 1Y
Market cap
$44.64B
P/E
31.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.39B
Div. yield
–
Server and Storage Hardware Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Super Micro Computer leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Super Micro Computer 5, NetApp 4, Everpure 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionPSMCINTAPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $46.26B $21.14B $44.64B P
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 182.7x 9.5x 31.5x SMCI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 44.4x 7.2x 21.2x SMCI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +27.2% +77.8% +12.2% SMCI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.9% 5.7% 19.2% NTAP
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 17.0% 36.7% NTAP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — -0.5x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +40.1% -32.3% +90.4% NTAP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +37.8%/yr +56.1%/yr +20.3%/yr SMCI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 73.0% 95.6% 44.8% NTAP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 51/100 58/100 56/100 SMCI

Percentile Scorecard

PSMCINTAP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisPSMCINTAP
Valuation 16 #93 of 111 64 #41 of 111 41 #66 of 111
Growth 78 #25 of 108 74 #29 of 108 51 #53 of 108
Profitability 64 #38 of 104 58 #44 of 104 91 #10 of 104
Financial Health 33 #77 of 115 68 #38 of 115 27 #84 of 115
Shareholder Returns 61 #32 of 81 25 #61 of 81 70 #25 of 81
Overall 51 58 56
  • P ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SMCI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • NTAP ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodPSMCINTAPSPY
1 month +4.3%-24.4%+10.4% -0.8%
3 months +77.1%+9.7%+30.8% +3.5%
6 months +77.7%+17.4%+104.8% +7.0%
Year to date +96.1%+11.7%+107.4% +12.2%
1 year +40.1%-32.3%+90.4% +13.0%
3 years +298.8%+35.4%+209.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year +58.6%+10.6%+45.7% +23.1%
5 years +396.8%+826.1%+151.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +37.8%+56.1%+20.3% +11.0%
10 years +948.8%+1,379.2%+553.2% +258.0%
10 years, per year +26.5%+30.9%+20.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasurePSMCINTAPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 73.0%95.6%44.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 82.7%98.1%38.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.624.011.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.55-0.342.02 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -48.6%-84.8%-43.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.3%-38.0%-7.1% -1.8%
52-week high $156.95$52.69$239.18 $779.14
52-week low $56.99$20.53$94.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultiplePSMCINTAP
P/E now vs peer median 172.7xmedian 32.0x 8.8xmedian 32.0x 30.7xmedian 32.0x
P/S now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 2.8x 0.5xmedian 2.8x 5.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 111.4xmedian 19.4x —median 19.4x 20.9xmedian 19.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 341.7xmedian 29.0x -3.1xmedian 29.0x 26.4xmedian 29.0x
P/B now vs peer median 28.4xmedian 2.9x 1.5xmedian 2.9x 29.1xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median 0.31median 1.13 0.22median 1.13 3.74median 1.13

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsPSMCINTAP
Revenue $4.26B $39.06B $7.39B
Gross profit $2.97B $4.23B $5.22B
Operating income $224.21M $2.77B $1.85B
Net income $253.29M $2.23B $1.42B
Free cash flow $128.17M -$6.97B $1.65B
R&D $1.05B $771.23M $1.02B
EPS (diluted) $0.73 $3.20 $7.09
Cash & equivalents $385.69M $7.52B $1.57B
Total debt – $2.00B $2.49B
Shares (diluted) 345.59M 697.35M 200.00M
Enterprise value $40.67B $4.04B $27.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricPSMCINTAP
P/E 172.7x 8.8x 30.7x
P/FCF 341.7x -3.1x 26.4x
P/Operating cash flow 102.4x -3.2x 22.9x
P/S 10.3x 0.5x 5.9x
P/B 28.4x 1.5x 29.1x
P/Tangible book 28.9x 1.5x 29.9x
EV/EBITDA 111.4x – 20.9x
EV/EBIT 190.8x 5.8x 23.0x
EV/Revenue 10.0x 0.4x 5.7x
EV/FCF 333.8x -2.3x 25.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 100.0x -2.3x 22.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.31 0.22 3.74

Growth

14 metrics
MetricPSMCINTAP
Revenue growth (1Y) 27.2% 77.8% 12.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 76.3% 6.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 28.3% 74.0% 13.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 48.8% 7.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 195.6% 121.1% 35.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 277.6% 53.8% 25.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 82.0% 112.7% 21.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 574.2% 51.6% 5.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 77.8% 91.6% 22.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 550.0% 40.9% 8.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -46.6% -510.4% 3.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -13.6% -130.6% 14.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.7% -555.0% -0.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -34.5% -135.9% 15.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricPSMCINTAP
Gross margin 69.7% 10.8% 70.6%
EBITDA margin 9.0% – 27.5%
Operating margin 5.3% 7.1% 25.0%
Pretax margin 6.6% 7.1% 24.7%
Net margin 5.9% 5.7% 19.2%
FCF margin 3.0% -17.8% 22.3%
Operating cash flow margin 10.0% -17.4% 25.7%
Return on equity 17.0% 20.2% 99.6%
Return on assets 5.1% 8.4% 13.1%
Return on invested capital – 17.0% 36.7%
Return on capital employed 8.0% 14.2% 29.4%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x -3.1x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 12.9% 1.1% 5.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricPSMCINTAP
Debt / assets – 6.7% 22.7%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 1.7x
Net debt / EBITDA – – -0.5x
Debt / FCF – -0.3x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 70.5% 51.6% 86.4%
Equity / assets 29.5% 48.4% 13.6%
Interest coverage – 14.2x –
Current ratio 1.5x 3.9x 1.2x
Quick ratio 1.3x 1.9x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.5x 1.1x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 8.07 3.53 4.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricPSMCINTAP
Dividend yield – – 0.9%
Net buyback yield 0.6% -6.8% 1.7%
Shareholder yield 0.6% -6.8% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusPSMCINTAP
Forward P/E 44.4xFY2026 7.2xFY2027 21.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.96FY2026 $4.52FY2027 $10.50FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +43.7%FY2026 +24.5%FY2027 +29.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +48.6% +21.7% +8.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.74BFY2026 $74.04BFY2027 $8.49BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +29.5%FY2026 +89.6%FY2027 +22.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +41.5% +5.0% +8.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersPSMCINTAP
Held by institutions 83.0% 68.0% 97.4%
Institutions holding 804 773 959
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.2% +32.3% -1.0%
Institutions buying 442 449 501
Institutions selling 259 233 336
Buyers to sellers 1.71 1.93 1.49

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

PSMCINTAP
P 1.00 0.36 0.55
SMCI 0.36 1.00 0.37
NTAP 0.55 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, P, SMCI and NTAP?

Everpure (P) is the largest by market capitalisation: Everpure (P) $46.26B, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) $21.14B, NetApp (NTAP) $44.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, P, SMCI and NTAP?

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Everpure (P) 182.7x, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 9.5x, NetApp (NTAP) 31.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) is cheapest (Everpure (P) 44.4x, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 7.2x, NetApp (NTAP) 21.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Everpure (P) +27.2%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) +77.8%, NetApp (NTAP) +12.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetApp (NTAP) has the highest net margin (Everpure (P) 5.9%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 5.7%, NetApp (NTAP) 19.2%). On return on invested capital, NetApp (NTAP) leads (Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 17.0%, NetApp (NTAP) 36.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year NetApp (NTAP) returned the most: Everpure (P) +40.1%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) -32.3%, NetApp (NTAP) +90.4%. Over five years, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) compounded fastest (Everpure (P) +37.8%/yr, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) +56.1%/yr, NetApp (NTAP) +20.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, NetApp (NTAP) has been the steadiest (Everpure (P) 73.0%, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) 95.6%, NetApp (NTAP) 44.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, P, SMCI and NTAP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Super Micro Computer (SMCI) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.